The 'far right' of which you speak here (though I wouldn't put Carlson and Owens in the same bracket as Blizerian), this 'far right' hold many of the same opinions you have outside of this topic.
Even on this topic they are similar to you, insomuch if their personal country was attacked they would probably be as fire and brimstone as yourself.
They have a 'first' loyalty to an ethnicity same as you do, it's just a different one.
I understand why right wing British Jews would support Israel, though I'd also say that what old Netty is doing is very much open to criticism even from a Zionist perspective......being that it's an 'all eggs in one basket' approach. Rather intelligently he's taken the opportunity to attack them one by one and the Arabs rather stupidly just let it happen (except the houthis).
More fool them and well played Netty/US....Even if this involves the horrible death of countless innocents alone the way.
Will he succeed or not.....it's open to criticism and also support depending upon opinion. There are many consequences flowing from this that few of us can realistically be sure about.....the splitting of the US right on the topic seems a real threat.
Which is why this thread is real example of free speech in my opinion.....because it contains strong points from both perspectives.
It's one of those topics though that contains very little 'meeting in the middle', which with war is usually the case.
England
www.lbc.co.uk
