Reform

[Stirlingsays]

No, not at all but I did pose the question wondering if you'd considered it but you were more interested in having a fight and getting on to your hobby horse.

You just wrote "why should I" or words to that effect without answering my enquiry.

Answer 1) Yes, I have considered it but as an Anglo Saxon, I think I belong in this country.

Answer 2) No, I haven't even considered it.

ASCPFC was good enough to give a reply without feeling the need to vociferously parade his racial purity.

I'd literally already answered and you asked again.

Besides, what's wrong with 'parading my racial purity'?

Make you feel awkward or something?.....Everyone comes from somewhere fella.

 

[Glazier#1]

I'd literally already answered and you asked again.

Besides, what's wrong with 'parading my racial purity'?

Make you feel awkward or something?.....Everyone comes from somewhere fella.

Why on Earth would it make me feel awkward?

So bellicose.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Why on Earth would it make me feel awkward?

So bellicose.

Bellicose?

You sound as if you want to support Chelsea.

Go in the kitchen and make yourself a prawn sandwich.

 

[Glazier#1]

Bellicose?

You sound as if you want to support Chelsea.

Go in the kitchen and make yourself a prawn sandwich.

Oh, sorry. Did I use a 'big word'? Does that make me a snob and not a 'real' football supporter?

Don't be silly now.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I'd literally already answered and you asked again.

Besides, what's wrong with 'parading my racial purity'?

Make you feel awkward or something?.....Everyone comes from somewhere fella.

Of course they do, and so do where they come from too.

You would only, on average, need to do that 7 or 8 times before it became clear that your racial origins aren’t as “pure” as you appear to think they are. Go even further and you will discover lots of contributions from all over the world. Even that ignores the fact that our lighter coloured skin is simply an evolutionary reaction to us living in countries with less sunlight than our ancestors.

Put simply, racial purity is a myth. At least in the genetic sense that you use it.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

Of course they do, and so do where they come from too.

You would only, on average, need to do that 7 or 8 times before it became clear that your racial origins aren’t as “pure” as you appear to think they are. Go even further and you will discover lots of contributions from all over the world. Even that ignores the fact that our lighter coloured skin is simply an evolutionary reaction to us living in countries with less sunlight than our ancestors.

Put simply, racial purity is a myth. At least in the genetic sense that you use it.

Spoken like a true Tory… I mean traitor.

When did Charles Windsor become a so called Palace fan? He should be reminded Islam will get rid of the Royal family. He’d probably agree, the fvckwit.

 

[Rudi Hedman]

Of course they do, and so do where they come from too.

You would only, on average, need to do that 7 or 8 times before it became clear that your racial origins aren’t as “pure” as you appear to think they are. Go even further and you will discover lots of contributions from all over the world. Even that ignores the fact that our lighter coloured skin is simply an evolutionary reaction to us living in countries with less sunlight than our ancestors.

Put simply, racial purity is a myth. At least in the genetic sense that you use it.

Try Africa or the swamp with the first cells then if you consider them your actual origins.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Of course they do, and so do where they come from too.

You would only, on average, need to do that 7 or 8 times before it became clear that your racial origins aren’t as “pure” as you appear to think they are. Go even further and you will discover lots of contributions from all over the world. Even that ignores the fact that our lighter coloured skin is simply an evolutionary reaction to us living in countries with less sunlight than our ancestors.

Put simply, racial purity is a myth. At least in the genetic sense that you use it.

This deconstruction argument is so stupid.

'Racial purity' were his words mate, not mine. I've posted so often on this and at you personally yet you don't appear to hold information in your old noggin.

I believe in racial categories, which are obvious to even children.

Purity is a nonsense word, like supremacy and it's used to by the left to attack nationalism....So that outsiders can come here and steal resources they aren't entitled to and if you object they call you 'racist'.

No mate, you don't get to have dual loyalties and my acceptance as well.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Spoken like a true Tory… I mean traitor.

When did Charles Windsor become a so called Palace fan? He should be reminded Islam will get rid of the Royal family. He’d probably the agree, the fvckwit.

What on earth are you wittering about?

Neither the King, or any other of the ridiculous comments in your response, have any connection to the subject.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Try Africa or the swamp with the first cells then if you consider them your actual origins.

We are discussing the human race, Homo sapiens. Not any of the evolutionary steps on the pathway that led to it.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

This deconstruction argument is so stupid.

'Racial purity' were his words mate, not mine. I've posted so often on this and at you personally yet you don't appear to hold information in your old noggin.

I believe in racial categories, which are obvious to even children.

Purity is a nonsense word, like supremacy and it's used to by the left to attack nationalism....So that outsiders can come here and steal resources they aren't entitled to and if you object they call you 'racist'.

No mate, you don't get to have dual loyalties and my acceptance as well.

If anyone is “deconstructing” an argument you have just tried to do it!

They were words used accurately to describe your attitude. Words you defended, rather than condemn.

Dividing people into categories is fine, just so long as those categories are determined by genuine attributes and not by arbitrary differences. From all I have read from you on this subject you seem to struggle to comprehend what that means.

It’s why race is a social construct and has nothing to do with the colour of our skins.

If you seek to divide people into cultural groupings then say so. A cultural group is not formed by people having the same skin colour. So constantly describing people as “white” or “black” is not just wrong. It’s offensive, causes unnecessary strife, divides incorrectly and is totally counter productive in today’s world.