TheBigToePunt
Member
- Country
England
Kamada has obviously been very prudent, and fair play to him for it. He's also taken risks others wouldn't, in that if he picked up a serious injury towards the end of any these contracts then he'd be out of work altogether with no club to take care of his medical needs, let alone a team to come back to. That scenario dissuades a lot of players from letting their contracts run down.When Kamada moves on it will be his third 'free' transfer in a row.
He is the very epitome of the footballing mercenary, but I don't say this in a disparaging way.
In many ways I'm surprised more footballers don't operate in this manner.
It gives them the opportunity to obtain massive signing on fees that they would otherwise be unlikely to obtain and also high wages over the course of short term contracts.
Guehi almost pulled it off too, but in a fit of conscience (or some other reason) had the grace to leave early to at least allow Palace to gain a small portion of his value.
The boot is on the other foot too as Palace took Lerma on a free from Bournemouth after he had impressed there and won their award for player of the season.
I think perhaps the biggest factor, though, is Kamada's modest transfer fee value when he is in contract.
On one hand, its simply impossible for clubs like Palace to let a £30-60m player walk away for nothing - if he won't re-sign then he must be sold, even if we have to engineer the move. That is possible to do, as there will always be a buyer given the quality of the player.
On the other hand, when it comes to a £10-15m player like Kamada, it's not so urgent. We can miss out on that money if needs be and it won't sink us. Given that he's doing a job in the team in the meantime it might make more sense to keep him even if we get a low offer. If we wanted to sell him, it's not obvious that there would be a queue of buyers.
Kamada's career path reflects a range of circumstances, including his own modest value as a saleable asset.
Last edited: