Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
- England
Do you really think it's realistic not to get involved in global affairs Stirls?
The Americans tried that and ultimately changed their policy. The world has a way of finding its way to your door even if you stay at home. What would have happened if America had remained neutral in WW1?
The Americans haven't been isolationist in global affairs....arguably ever, but I think you are referring to 9/11 and while that incredible evil deserved war against the Taliban to get at Al-Qaeda (though we knew they received security state backing from Saudi, Pakistan and assorted elsewheres).
One of Bin Laden's main complaints was the number of American military bases in Arab countries and their influence upon middle eastern policy on behalf of Israel. Why this justified thousands of people dying just shows you the evil that war is.
However, as we now know that war suffered from massive mission creep which failed monumentally. Idiots wanted to nation build and turn the culture into a pro western one, as if they were dealing with an ordered hierarchical society like Japan. Many people paid for this idiocy with their lives. Something for which no one was ever held to account.....that's a theme that I've seen constantly and shows you what real power is.....Make a stupid nasty tweet and get sent down for years, get thousands of military killed (often the cream of your society) in a foreign war you lose....that was justified with a lot of lies.....and nothing happens.
There is an anti neo con movement in Republicanism now....something I'm happy to back (I was a stanch neo con twenty years ago and I was wrong and lied to). It isn't exactly isolationism but it's definitely less deranged than the fruitcakes in the State department who have been deciding foreign policy, with disastrous results, for decades now.
Last edited: