• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Is Glasner the problem?

Lanzo-Ad said:
Glasner now has to play his part, if we are going to stick with him long-term, and buy players to fit his system, he has to play his part, he has to extend his contract, there is no point in the club backing him to the hilt over the next two windows without him extending beyond his 18 months left on his contract.
Click to expand...
Glasner isn't in the driving seat when it comes to his contract. It's down to the club to offer him an extension.

You wanted to sack him two weeks ago !
 
Glasner is better than many of our previous managers. Vieira, Alan Pardew, Roy, etc.

We are lucky to have him. Cos when our form picks up, the big-money boys will want to poach Glasner from us.

we thumped Brighton in their own back yard. Nice.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
Glasner is better than many of our previous managers. Vieira, Alan Pardew, Roy, etc.

We are lucky to have him. Cos when our form picks up, the big-money boys will want to poach Glasner from us.

we thumped Brighton in their own back yard. Nice.
Click to expand...

Too early to make those claims.

Stats do not back it up either.

I believe he is better then PV & Pardew but Roys tough one the man had spells at the club for long time with almost no resources and we always finished mid table.

Glasner has far better quality players and has had money spent lets see what he does in charge for full season.
 
NEILLO said:
Glasner isn't in the driving seat when it comes to his contract. It's down to the club to offer him an extension.

You wanted to sack him two weeks ago !
Click to expand...
Yes i did, and i still might want him out, But, he is as i have said many times, a one trick pony, but it is a good trick, and if you are going to back him financially in the market with the players HE wants, then you need him to be offered an extension and have him except it, he left Wolfsburg after two years even though he got them into the champions league because he didn't get on with the chairman, he left Frankfurt for similar reasons, so he has a record of walking out if he doesn't get his way, so if he thinks we can play every game with the players we have, he cant, so some stability is needed.
 
Lanzo-Ad said:
Yes i did, and i still might want him out, But, he is as i have said many times, a one trick pony, but it is a good trick, and if you are going to back him financially in the market with the players HE wants, then you need him to be offered an extension and have him except it, he left Wolfsburg after two years even though he got them into the champions league because he didn't get on with the chairman, he left Frankfurt for similar reasons, so he has a record of walking out if he doesn't get his way, so if he thinks we can play every game with the players we have, he cant, so some stability is needed.
Click to expand...
I’m pro Glasner but let’s be realistic - he’s unlikely to be offered a contract extension as things stand at present. Frankly that just wouldn’t make sense while we are in a relegation battle.

And I don’t understand how you might still want him sacked but at the same time you’re proposing a contract extension !

Given the lack of strength in depth in the squad and the injury situation I think we certainly need some reinforcements in January.

Parish and Freedman both know Glasners preferred way of playing so you would hope and expect that any signings are capable of fitting into his system.
 
NEILLO said:
I’m pro Glasner but let’s be realistic - he’s unlikely to be offered a contract extension as things stand at present. Frankly that just wouldn’t make sense while we are in a relegation battle.

And I don’t understand how you might still want him sacked but at the same time you’re proposing a contract extension !

Given the lack of strength in depth in the squad and the injury situation I think we certainly need some reinforcements in January.

Parish and Freedman both know Glasners preferred way of playing so you would hope and expect that any signings are capable of fitting into his system.
Click to expand...
Its quite simple, if you back him with 3 or 4 players he wants, and we need to sell to fund it he needs to commit to the club, if we don't get the players he wants and we continue to play the same way, which he will, we will have a lot of Arsenal type score lines, so it doesn't matter what i think or yourself, its the board, Back him or sack him, i don't think if you sell Guehi for 50m and get 3 in he wants, maybe one on a loan, the loss of Guehi doesn't make one bit of difference.
 
Eagle-Trucker said:
Is the correct answer .
Click to expand...
Kamada wasn't the problem. The defence was. Also, Guehi shouldn't be captain. His lack of creatively saw why we spent so much time indulging in sideways and back passes playing up from the back thus giving time for Arsenal's defence to regroup. This partly explained why taking our chances and our defence couldn't cope with Arsenal's quick transit from defence to attack.
 
Rainforest said:
Kamada wasn't the problem. The defence was. Also, Guehi shouldn't be captain. His lack of creatively saw why we spent so much time indulging in sideways and back passes playing up from the back thus giving time for Arsenal's defence to regroup. This partly explained why taking our chances and our defence couldn't cope with Arsenal's quick transit from defence to attack.
Click to expand...
He's also not the solution to any problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top