Glasner publicly said when he arrived that he'd told Parish he didn't come to the club if its only ambition was consolidation. True to his word, when the club failed to invest in the squad in the summer he decided they were unwilling or unable to match that ambition and he told them he would leave at the end of the season. I imagine this came after the club looked to replace Eze on the cheap. Glasner's exit would probably have ended amicably were it not for the lack of investment resulting in us ending up with only 12 fit senior players and our form plummeting. We didn't stop winning because Glasner's tactics were found out, we stopped winning because we only had one player left on the pitch who could score, and he is carrying a knee injury.
I've always backed Glasner because it's hard to argue against the success he has brought us, and all while playing pretty decent football, but I can't understand what yesterday's outburst achieves for anyone. He seems to have real issues with accepting defeat, which in some ways is probably behind his success, but right now the fans needed some calm-headedness after a turbulent 24 hours and he let us down. Given the circumstances, he has put himself in an untenable position, whether intentionally or not.
While a lot of disgruntlement will be targeted at Glasner today, the sad fact is the club have made a right hash of their transfer business this season. If you don't have much money was it really the best decision to sign two players with no experience (Uche and Canvot)? To sign a left-back who has been out of form for two years? To sign a right winger to replace a left-sided attacking midfielder? What should have been an amazing year for us has been let down by poor decisions and now we will have to try and limp over the line. If the board also decide to sell JP this month then they might want to stay away from the ground for a few months.