What and who are the English?

From my experience in London pubs Irishmen are more likely to be a bit wary of each other than be particularly concerned about a stray Englishman in their company.
we are all belligerent and enjoy a good ruck. On many levels i prefer the English to the irish.....the latter seem friendly, we are often smiling while taking a photograph of your credit card numbers, and arranging for your wife to meet us at a Travelodge.
The English seem to encompass either the very best of humanity or occasionally the very worst. Its either Enid Blyton picnics, Evelyn Waugh mansions and cricket on the lawn........or its a drunken fight at the queue at Alton Towers.
 
i will agree with you, just after you prove there is no such thing as gender.

Regarding English identity , there is a curious paradox in the way you look at History of England. For many commentators, it seems to be.....

Romans are referred to as .....'them'
Vikings.......them
Normans.....them

Anglo-Saxons......Us, we,
Celtic-Britons 500 AD......both them and us.
Stonehenge Neolithic types........ ?

King Arthur, the Celt......one of Us.
Good King Billy...........one of us, British ( he wasn't )

King Alfred..........one of us
King Canute........one of them

and for the BBC.....post 1945 newcomers.......Us.
Celts is just a generic name to cover a load of different European tribes. Like Vikings. Not a definable ethnic group.
 
6% of the population are "the face of Britain" apparently. A face that has attacked our culture, demanded rights and greater privilege than everyone else, and generally causes a great deal of trouble and concern for the majority.


He described the UK as a "community of communities where Muslims are at the forefront of Britain's story", he thanked the community for their "brilliance and service to our country," specifically acknowledging professionals like doctors, teachers, actors, and journalists, stating it was his government's job to tell this "deeper story" of Muslim contribution to "drown out the voices that seek to divide us".

I've never ever been a Tory or remotely on the right wing, but this is a threat to English culture and northern European heritige. Reform just won my vote from undecided thanks to this clear path. I'll take any pain, I'll be ok with that.

One of the Labour MPs recently said "You can't out reform Reform" and that's why Labour have taken a swing to the lunatics lurching to the Greens.
Starmer is an absolute shyster. We must rid ourselves of these self serving scumbags.
 
Celts is just a generic name to cover a load of different European tribes. Like Vikings. Not a definable ethnic group.
Celtic languages are a family. All related with much in common.

what you assert is equivalent to saying Slavs are not real cos its a load of different tribes. Not a definable ethnic group. Slavs are real, Celts are real, Catalans and Kurds are also real even though everybody tries to deny it.


 
The modern 'English' have been established as a recognisable group since the European invasions/migrations 1500 years ago. They pushed the so called Celts out to the periphery of Britain. Before that, the so called Celtic tribes were here from maybe 3000 year ago. The Beaker people arrived about 4500 years ago and were probably 'Celts' as well. They replaced the neolithic Britons that had been here since the ice age ended.
What we have seen in the last 50 years is a massive and swift change in demographics from regions of the world which bear no cultural or genetic similarity to English heritage. The English are what was here before that. A long established and stable population of genetically and culturally similar people.

Can you just become English? No. Can you embrace Englishness and be accepted by the English? Yes.

You have a choice. With us or against us.
 
Celtic languages are a family. All related with much in common.

what you assert is equivalent to saying Slavs are not real cos its a load of different tribes. Not a definable ethnic group. Slavs are real, Celts are real, Catalans and Kurds are also real even though everybody tries to deny it.


They are real but not a 'race'. Just a blanket definition.
 
we are all belligerent and enjoy a good ruck. On many levels i prefer the English to the irish.....the latter seem friendly, we are often smiling while taking a photograph of your credit card numbers, and arranging for your wife to meet us at a Travelodge.
The English seem to encompass either the very best of humanity or occasionally the very worst. Its either Enid Blyton picnics, Evelyn Waugh mansions and cricket on the lawn........or its a drunken fight at the queue at Alton Towers.

Some of the most creative people seem to be a mix of English with Irish.....Wilde, Beatles, Yeats, Beckett, Kate Bush, Morrissey, David Bowie.
 
They are real but not a 'race'. Just a blanket definition.
ok whatever. We are getting close to the Lefty territory of 'race is merely a social construct' wherein i would need to book a few padded cells at the Laughing Academy.

Discussions of identity and ethnicity are often a nightmare. See Northern Ireland where the British tribe and the Irish Tribe dispute the identity of the Land. And both groups wants the other one to feckoff away 'back to where they came from'. Their only true point of agreement is that they all hate the English.

Anyhoo.....back to the OP, who are the English ? Its almost an impossible question to answer without...

a. some fecker disagreeing with you
b. somebody getting personal with the insults
c. Some fruitcake at the BBC having a nutty answer to the question
d. some totally wrong answers being bandied about

my final word is you gotta take the ugly with the beautiful. Warts and all. The good AND the bad. We all must do that for every respective identity.
So 'English' is the bloke who invented the internet (Tim Berners lee) and also Ian Huntley/Peter Sutcliffe. French is Joan of Arc and Robespierre. Irish is the monks at the very start of the Western christianity story AND the horrific Magdalene Laundries.

how about this : You are English when you do not have much of an alternate back-story to compete with. Either of your own admission or from a.n other pointing the finger and decrying your lack of honesty. You can also be English/other duel ...at the same time. Like Cliff Richard.
 
Last edited:
ok whatever. We are getting close to the Lefty territory of 'race is merely a social construct' wherein i would need to book a few padded cells at the Laughing Academy.

Discussions of identity and ethnicity are often a nightmare. See Northern Ireland where the British tribe and the Irish Tribe dispute the identity of the Land. And both groups wants the other one to feckoff away 'back to where they came from'. Their only true point of agreement is that they all hate the English.

Anyhoo.....back to the OP, who are the English ? Its almost an impossible question to answer without...

a. some fecker disagreeing with you
b. somebody getting personal with the insults
c. Some fruitcake at the BBC having a nutty answer to the question
d. some totally wrong answers being bandied about

my final word is you gotta take the ugly with the beautiful. Warts and all. The good AND the bad. We all must do that for every respective identity.
So 'English' is the bloke who invented the internet (Tim Berners lee) and also Ian Huntley/Peter Sutcliffe. French is Joan of Arc and Robespierre. Irish is the monks at the very start of the Western christianity story AND the horrific Magdalene Laundries.
Race is not a scientific definition. Humans are all one species, but you would have to be blind or stupid not to see that there is some differentiation going on within that species. People within a group with similar genetic characteristics are referred to commonly as a race, which is fine, but then you also have religious groups claiming to be a race which is obvious crap. You can have a religion which predominantly followed one so called race, but that's as far as it goes.

The trouble with race is how do you separate one from another. Black people for example aren't the same as Europeans, but they are more diverse than anyone else, having been around longer. What about the Japanese? They aren't all the same. Some have more European genetic heritage.

Confused? You will be.
 
Race is not a scientific definition. Humans are all one species, but you would have to be blind or stupid not to see that there is some differentiation going on within that species. People within a group with similar genetic characteristics are referred to commonly as a race, which is fine, but then you also have religious groups claiming to be a race which is obvious crap. You can have a religion which predominantly followed one so called race, but that's as far as it goes.

The trouble with race is how do you separate one from another. Black people for example aren't the same as Europeans, but they are more diverse than anyone else, having been around longer. What about the Japanese? They aren't all the same. Some have more European genetic heritage.

Confused? You will be.

The cognitive dissonance being that the far left don't actually want diversity as they want races to be mixed out via interbreeding. And to have no differences that can create tribal aspects.

The rallying cry for diversity is just to destroy current nations connected to an ethnicity.....The actual end point of it would be to destroy actual diversity.

That would presumably only exist in zoos.
 
The cognitive dissonance being that the far left don't actually want diversity as they want races to be mixed out via interbreeding. And to have no differences that can create tribal aspects.

The rallying cry for diversity is just to destroy current nations connected to an ethnicity.....The actual end point of it would be to destroy actual diversity.

That would presumably only exist in zoos.
The ability to travel more easily has mixed us all up with a greater diversity of other people. There seems to be a contradiction in human nature where genetic diversity is favoured alongside cultural pressure to stick to one's own. The left thinks they can employ ideological rules to nature in order to manipulate it. That is bonkers.
They want a global society with equality and diversity and yet diversity would disappear if every genetic group interbred, and we know that equality is impossible, as outcomes cannot be fixed.

It isn't hard to understand this, so my view is that most of their 'ideals' are more about political gain, self serving or tribalism, which is ironic.
 
Last edited:
The left thinks they can employ ideological rules to nature in order to manipulate it. That is bonkers.
They want a global society with equality and diversity and yet diversity would disappear if every genetic group interbred, and we know that equality is impossible, as outcomes cannot be fixed.

I don't think that even the Left themselves know what they want. They seem to change the rules every five minutes. They certainly do not like the nuclear family of English Nigel & Sharon whereby he earns and she is a stay at home mum.

Beyond that, they will happily shovel money at various types of longterm unemployed, in monoCultural enclaves, to have big families - where the mother never bothered to learn English.

The left also like 'blended families' - one mother, many kids from many different fathers. But even then, they seem uncomfortable when Nigel imports a Bride and dates 'off the Reservation'.....and yet they seem to love it when Sharon does the same thing.
 
Last edited:
I don't think that even the Left themselves know what they want. They seem to change the rules every five minutes. They certainly do not like the nuclear family of English Nigel & Sharon whereby he earns and she is a stay at home mum.

Beyond that, they will happily shovel money at various types of longterm unemployed, in monoCultural enclaves, to have big families. The left also like 'blended families' - one mother, many kids from many different fathers. But even then, they seem uncomfortable when Nigel imports a Bride and dates 'off the Reservation'.....and yet they seem to love it when Sharon does the same thing.
The left create problems and then try to put a sticking plaster on them downstream, or just deny they exist.
Liberalism has released us from suffocating Victorian values, the arrogance of imperialism, and religious sanctimony, but at the same time, destroyed the fabric of our society and eroded our culture and moral values.

Short sighted, self serving and idealistic beyond reason.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top