War in Ukraine

Stirlingsays said:
That's quite interesting.

I think Diana's death was an accident.....the driver was over confident.
I think Kelly committed suicide.....couldn't take the pressure amid poor health.
Don't know about Guiffre.
Doubts about McAfee.
Click to expand...

I would bet that you were in the minority on both Princess Diana and Dr Kelly.

Notice you didn't mention Epstein!
Once one acknowledges the probability that it could be done to even one inconvenient person, the possibilities are endless.

Interesting to see what former Conservative MP Andrew Brigden is saying today.
1765961336742.webp
 
McAhuna said:
I would bet that you were in the minority on both Princess Diana and Dr Kelly.

Notice you didn't mention Epstein!
Once one acknowledges the probability that it could be done to even one inconvenient person, the possibilities are endless.

Interesting to see what former Conservative MP Andrew Brigden is saying today.
View attachment 2496
Click to expand...
Why don't you go and live in Putin's Utopia?
 
Stirlingsays said:
That's quite interesting.

I think Diana's death was an accident.....the driver was over confident.
I think Kelly committed suicide.....couldn't take the pressure amid poor health.
Don't know about Guiffre.
Doubts about McAfee.
Click to expand...
Yes, it's ludicrous to think that an assassination would be carried out by staging a motoring accident.
 
McAhuna said:
I would bet that you were in the minority on both Princess Diana and Dr Kelly.

Notice you didn't mention Epstein!
Once one acknowledges the probability that it could be done to even one inconvenient person, the possibilities are endless.

Interesting to see what former Conservative MP Andrew Brigden is saying today.
View attachment 2496
Click to expand...

I reserve the right to be wrong certainly.

I'm open minded to be convinced otherwise but that's where I am at the moment.

I think I was wrong on JFK.....I think the intel services are still holding back on that as not everything is released and we still have redactions despite initial transparency claims....I tend towards the Hunt deathbed confession holding a lot of water.

As for Epstein.....I'm all in on that one. In fact I think the official narrative from the White House/intel services on Epstein is a crock of brown stuff.

Also, I have my suspicion over the Charlie Kirk murder.

But again, open minded.

It's just recently been confirmed that Kirk sent out text messages the night before he was assassinated saying that he thought he was going to be murdered that day.

So he knew something was up.
 
Last edited:
Stirlingsays said:
I reserve the right to be wrong certainly.

I'm open minded to be convinced otherwise but that's where I am at the moment.

I think I was wrong on JFK.....I think the intel services are still holding back on that as not everything is released and we still have redactions despite initial transparency claims....I tend towards the Hunt deathbed confession holding a lot of water.

As for Epstein.....I'm all in on that one. In fact I think the official narrative from the White House/intel services on Epstein is a crock of brown stuff.

Also, I have my suspicion over the Charlie Kirk murder.

But again, open minded.

It's just recently been confirmed that Kirk sent out text messages the night before he was assassinated saying that he thought he was going to be murdered that day.

So he knew something was up.
Click to expand...

Some new stuff for me there. I'll look into the Hunt confession.

Charlie Kirk does look extremely sus.

It's sus when these things are carried out by a lone white assassin with no previous, who then mysteriously disappears into the background of the story.
 
georgenorman said:
Yes, it's ludicrous to think that an assassination would be carried out by staging a motoring accident.
Click to expand...

Perhaps.
But what if the assassination wasn't the motoring accident, just a means to access the victim?
Eye-witnesses suggested she wasn't badly hurt by the accident.
But the ambulance on the scene that took her in waited an hour before leaving for the hospital.
By the time she arrived at hospital it was too late.

Like Charlie Kirk, she openly feared they would take her out - and she even mentioned 'car accident' as the means they would use.
 
McAhuna said:
Some new stuff for me there. I'll look into the Hunt confession.

Charlie Kirk does look extremely sus.

It's sus when these things are carried out by a lone white assassin with no previous, who then mysteriously disappears into the background of the story.
Click to expand...

The intel google searches into places and people connected to Kirk's murder prior....and that's the important aspect, prior to the murder are what stands out to me......Nothing before July and then lots leading up to the murder....and then as soon as it's revealed they are deleted.

People talk about the plane and phone tracking, but for me that's the big one I want properly answered before I believe anything else.

However, I believe Tyler was the shooter however.....but why there wasn't a neck exit wound from that type of bullet requires some convincing explanation for me.

The prosecution evidence starts in May I believe.
 
Stirlingsays said:
The intel google searches into places and people connected to Kirk's murder prior....and that's the important aspect, prior to the murder are what stands out to me......Nothing before July and then lots leading up to the murder....and then as soon as it's revealed they are deleted.

People talk about the plane and phone tracking, but for me that's the big one I want properly answered before I believe anything else.

However, I believe Tyler was the shooter however.....but why there wasn't a neck exit wound from that type of bullet requires some convincing explanation for me.

The prosecution evidence starts in May I believe.
Click to expand...

I suspect that, as with JFK, they are skilled at finding a willing patsy who is willing to take a shot.
But they don't leave it to chance. There are other means to make sure the plan is successful.
And the lone wolf patsy takes the full blame either way.
 
McAhuna said:
Perhaps.
But what if the assassination wasn't the motoring accident, just a means to access the victim?
Eye-witnesses suggested she wasn't badly hurt by the accident.
But the ambulance on the scene that took her in waited an hour before leaving for the hospital.
By the time she arrived at hospital it was too late.

Like Charlie Kirk, she openly feared they would take her out - and she even mentioned 'car accident' as the means they would use.
Click to expand...
These theories are like James Bond movies where the villain dreams up some complicated way of killing Bond!
 
McAhuna said:
Some new stuff for me there. I'll look into the Hunt confession.

Charlie Kirk does look extremely sus.

It's sus when these things are carried out by a lone white assassin with no previous, who then mysteriously disappears into the background of the story.
Click to expand...
There was no 'Hunt confession' - it's bollox.
 
georgenorman said:
These theories are like James Bond movies where the villain dreams up some complicated way of killing Bond!
Click to expand...

10-20 years ago you people would have been laughing your heads off at the idea of a secret child-sex island visited by Hollywood stars, the Royal Family, US presidents and CEOs of blue-chip companies.

You know it's true. It's why they get away with it for so long and so easily.
 
McAhuna said:
10-20 years ago you people would have been laughing your heads off at the idea of a secret child-sex island visited by Hollywood stars, the Royal Family, US presidents and CEOs of blue-chip companies.

You know it's true. It's why they get away with it for so long and so easily.
Click to expand...
Epstein's activities of course have nothing whatsoever to do with the death of Diana.
 
McAhuna said:
I suspect that, as with JFK, they are skilled at finding a willing patsy who is willing to take a shot.
But they don't leave it to chance. There are other means to make sure the plan is successful.
And the lone wolf patsy takes the full blame either way.
Click to expand...

His tranny boyfriend looks like the 'way in'.

Same with the guy who shot and grazed Trump's ear. I suspect he was contacted by some fed who had infiltrated an extremist group.

No one needs to be a genius to see how it could be done.

But it has to be proved.....and that would be near impossible.
 
Stirlingsays said:
But it has to be proved.....and that would be near impossible.
Click to expand...

Except by internal whistleblowers. Who are then smeared as lunatics, sex-offenders, traitors and whatever mud sticks.
....and they know there are plenty of everyday suckers who they can convince to laugh along with the 'joke', and join in casting stones at the whistleblowers who tried to help them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top