• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

War in Ukraine

Everyone and their dog knows that it's a proxy war between he US and Russia.

All we want is peace. Somthing that hasn't been talked about since before the war started. If the EU, NATO and Ukraine arnt will to even talk peace to save lives then it's up to the adults to do that.
Everyone and their dog knows that it's a proxy war between he US and Russia.
If that were really true then the Russian forces would have been anhiliated. It's also an insult to all the Ukranians who've died fighting.

All we want is peace

And your peace will come at accepting Putin's terms which no Ukrainian would accept. Putin has demonstrated he is totally untrustworthy. It would surprise nobody if that peace were only to last until Russia's forces were replenished to the extent they could finish the job.
 
I don’t understand why Trump hasn’t suggested peace talks with Ukraine leaving Russia out and in advance of them issued a statement as to what he think the terms to be imposed on Russia would look like?
I mean who is actually on Russia’s side in this dispute? I didn’t know so I checked. Belarus; Iran; North Korea; China. India and Myanmar.
It will all come down to what’s in it for the US and nothing else. If he can drive a wedge between Russia and China and get his hands on Ukraines mineral resources he will be laughing.
 
Everyone and their dog knows that it's a proxy war between he US and Russia.
If that were really true then the Russian forces would have been anhiliated. It's also an insult to all the Ukranians who've died fighting.

All we want is peace

And your peace will come at accepting Putin's terms which no Ukrainian would accept. Putin has demonstrated he is totally untrustworthy. It would surprise nobody if that peace were only to last until Russia's forces were replenished to the extent they could finish the job.
That's fine then they can go on killing each other and needlessly dieing if they don't want or accept it. 👍🏻
 
I wonder what sort of "settlement" is likely when Ukraine is excluded from the talks?

Well, I don't think you can exclude Ukraine from any peace deal. However, America do get to decide on how much they fund this war. I hear a lot of criticism about America not using their taxpayer to fund a European war and I think....if I was an American struggling to pay my bills, living paycheck to paycheck (like most of them) I'd be pretty miffed.....and as we saw with the election, continuing intervention wars isn't a vote winner.

However, I do agree that Ukraine ultimately get to decide whether they fight Russia or not.....not that I agree with Zelensky getting to stay dictator without elections using the war as an excuse. Plenty of countries have held elections during wars, including Russia.....We made Iraq and Afghanistan hold elections while they were fighting resistance movements blowing up venue after venue....it's all an excuse to keep their man in charge.

I say to you why should I care if Putin wins this war? What difference does that make?
What difference did it make when Germany invaded Poland?
Well WW2 ended in being a disaster for us, my view on it is closer to Tucker Carlson's (which itself goes back to Patrick Buchanan's opinion) and that view is becoming far more popular within conservativism. In fact I think it won't be long before it becomes the defacto conservative opinion with the changing of generations and the worsening of the European future.

Regardless frankly I'm tired of this constant reference back to the world war....something that those of us on the anti war side of this debate are trying to avoid while the inevitable consequences of what you're saying is that we either enlarge an existing war with Russia and get our people killed or seemingly continue fighting until Ukraine collapses.....I'm not sure what exactly you expect to happen or change.

Again, I'd point you to the battlefield, Ukraine is losing territory every day, Biden's policy didn't work....all this was predicted at the start.
If the CIA played a part in overturning a democratically (really?) elected government, you might want to consider Moscow's involvement in selecting the governments of several other former Soviet satellite states?

That's whataboutism, but regardless, I've never been on here saying that Putin's Russia is some model I want to follow. Russia and Ukraine are both corrupt countries. Zelensky was prominent in the Panama papers because he's corrupt and Ukraine before the war was receiving major complaints about its neo Nazi regiments.....but this was all glossed over as soon as it became convenient.

Yes, Russia was also trying to influence Ukraine during 2014 but it lost out and I don't support any of that underhand brown envelope stuff. But you know what the difference is between Russia and the US? The difference is that Ukraine is on Russia's border with a lot of Russian support in the east. It has a massive self interest in not having an anti Russian state on its border, five hours drive from Moscow. The west on the other hand has no business being in Ukraine spending billions to overthrow a democratically elected government.

Something they denied and thus lied about by the way, if it weren't for whistleblowers like Benz we would still think it was all organic.

The seemingly easy option is to let Putin get his own way, I agree, but what will that mean for the medium and longer term for all Europe not just Ukraine?

At the start of the old thread regarding this war I held a pro Ukrainian stance on this war. The posts are all still there. In fact I've never agreed with the decision Putin took. My position only changed to an anti war position here once I fully went into the context and history and likely consequences of this war.....I realised then that there was plenty of lies being told and that there were no good guys here.

Well, that's not strictly true, the good guys were those fighting for their country....lions being used by a donkey elite who now fill graveyard after graveyard because they were wasted in a war that they couldn't win.....the war should have been ended in 2022.

But while it's true that I found out that this war should and could have been easily avoided what also factored into my change of position here was a simple evaluation of how it would likely end. A war with no upsides is a bad war. I could see how the war benefited the US and China and even Russia....but I couldn't see how it had anything but disastrous costs for us.

The advantages were always with Russia. All they had....and have to do is avoid economic collapse and they win. So what happens, well Biden's inability to talk to Putin meant that he went to China and all we did was strengthen both of them.....I've said this many times, this war was conducted by western elites that I wouldn't trust to win a game of chess against a teenager.
 
Last edited:
This is Tim Davies, former RAF fighter pilot, 20 years in the military. Here he talks about the Ukraine conflict but also Starmer's plans but all within the context of what's been happening in the military and society in terms of woke and what effects it has had.....all in general over years and years under both Conservative and Labour control.

I recommend him for getting at the truth when it comes to all things military.

 
I don’t understand why Trump hasn’t suggested peace talks with Ukraine leaving Russia out and in advance of them issued a statement as to what he think the terms to be imposed on Russia would look like?
I mean who is actually on Russia’s side in this dispute? I didn’t know so I checked. Belarus; Iran; North Korea; China. India and Myanmar.
It will all come down to what’s in it for the US and nothing else. If he can drive a wedge between Russia and China and get his hands on Ukraines mineral resources he will be laughing.
He is cozying up to Vlad driving a wedge between Europe, NATO - and the USA at the moment
Going better than Vlad could ever have hoped for. Trump doing his work for him.





=
 
He is cozying up to Vlad driving a wedge between Europe, NATO - and the USA at the moment
Going better than Vlad could ever have hoped for. Trump doing his work for him.
=

Trump was just voted in a few weeks ago making his views known on the Ukraine war for years. He won all three places of government in the vote. He's representating a majority of Americans.

And his views won out over massive pro Ukraine war narratives in the media. In this country the anti war, anti involvement narrative literally isn't allowed on the airwaves......How is that objective?

That wedge you speak of exists, it's people who were gung ho for voices like Trump to be ignored who had a whole three years to win the war......a war they have financially made us in hock for, made us in hock to pay Ukraine's debts if it defaults.......and by the end of that war all they have achieved is to fill up graveyards of young men and lose 25 percent of Ukraine.

And yet after all that failure.....we are the ones being moaned at?
 
Last edited:
Of course. We need to be cautious in sensitive areas. Uncontroversial ones less so. It’s fast and gives the same answers as slower ones. I am glad to see the competition.
Sure. It's all open and above board.

According to DeepSeek's own privacy policy, it collects large amounts of personal information collected from users, which is then stored "in secure servers" in China.
This may include:
  • Your email address, phone number and date of birth, entered when creating an account
  • Any user input including text and audio, as well as chat histories
  • So-called "technical information" - ranging from your phone's model and operating system to your IP address and "keystroke patterns".
It says it uses this information to improve DeepSeek by enhancing its "safety, security and stability".
It will then share this information with others, such as service providers, advertising partners, and its corporate group, which will be kept "for as long as necessary".
 
Sure. It's all open and above board.

According to DeepSeek's own privacy policy, it collects large amounts of personal information collected from users, which is then stored "in secure servers" in China.
This may include:
  • Your email address, phone number and date of birth, entered when creating an account
  • Any user input including text and audio, as well as chat histories
  • So-called "technical information" - ranging from your phone's model and operating system to your IP address and "keystroke patterns".
It says it uses this information to improve DeepSeek by enhancing its "safety, security and stability".
It will then share this information with others, such as service providers, advertising partners, and its corporate group, which will be kept "for as long as necessary".
There is no need to expose your personal details at all. You can consult without an account and do so via a VPN.
 
There is no need to expose your personal details at all. You can consult without an account and do so via a VPN.
Fine - as long as they have no way of accessing this, or any other, information. Personally I'd still doubt the veracity of the content though.
 
Last edited:
Trump was just voted in a few weeks ago making his views known on the Ukraine war for years. He won all three places of government in the vote. He's representating a majority of Americans.

And his views won out over massive pro Ukraine war narratives in the media. In this country the anti war, anti involvement narrative literally isn't allowed on the airwaves......How is that objective?

That wedge you speak of exists, it's people who were gung ho for voices like Trump to be ignored who had a whole three years to win the war......a war they have financially made us in hock for, made us in hock to pay Ukraine's debts if it defaults.......and by the end of that war all they have achieved is to fill up graveyards of young men and lose 25 percent of Ukraine.

And yet after all that failure.....we are the ones being moaned at?
Representing the majority does not mean just doing what they want.

Leaders lead. They don’t follow. It’s hardly surprising that there is a mood among the Trump supporters to get rid of the obligations in Ukraine. Most have no interest at all. A politician will be wiser than that and aware of the long term implications. A businessman populist isn’t. His priority is to please, not to lead. Trump is a disaster for everyone except Putin.

Appeasement doesn’t work, yet you have advocated it on here from day one writing long diatribes no doubt influenced by some of the darkest voices present on the internet. Indeed you quote some. Some of these have doubtless themselves been exposed to the covert activities of Russia as they plant ideas into the discourse. You are being used, but you won’t even realise it, let alone admit it.
 
Issue now is not so much what happens in terms of the talks about the outcome of Ukraine but what then comes afterwards.

But this does not end here. The truth needs to come out about 'why' this wretched war happened in the first place. With the involvement of the Bidens first and foremost along with lots of people associated with both the CIA and MI6 in being primary movers in orchestrating this entire debacle. And lets not touch on the horrendous mess that is the Nord Star 2 sabotage.

This mess does not go away once the fighting stops. It only gets messier and messier. Because it sums up everything that has been wrong about how the West has been run over the last 20 years. And almost none of the major players will come out of this unscathed.

It is going to be a mind f*** of epic proportions. Potentially change the world for the next 25 years in the same way that the September 11th attacks did back in 2001.
 
Well, I don't think you can exclude Ukraine from any peace deal. However, America do get to decide on how much they fund this war. I hear a lot of criticism about America not using their taxpayer to fund a European war and I think....if I was an American struggling to pay my bills, living paycheck to paycheck (like most of them) I'd be pretty miffed.....and as we saw with the election, continuing intervention wars isn't a vote winner.

However, I do agree that Ukraine ultimately get to decide whether they fight Russia or not.....not that I agree with Zelensky getting to stay dictator without elections using the war as an excuse. Plenty of countries have held elections during wars, including Russia.....We made Iraq and Afghanistan hold elections while they were fighting resistance movements blowing up venue after venue....it's all an excuse to keep their man in charge.


Well WW2 ended in being a disaster for us, my view on it is closer to Tucker Carlson's (which itself goes back to Patrick Buchanan's opinion) and that view is becoming far more popular within conservativism. In fact I think it won't be long before it becomes the defacto conservative opinion with the changing of generations and the worsening of the European future.

Regardless frankly I'm tired of this constant reference back to the world war....something that those of us on the anti war side of this debate are trying to avoid while the inevitable consequences of what you're saying is that we either enlarge an existing war with Russia and get our people killed or seemingly continue fighting until Ukraine collapses.....I'm not sure what exactly you expect to happen or change.

Again, I'd point you to the battlefield, Ukraine is losing territory every day, Biden's policy didn't work....all this was predicted at the start.


That's whataboutism, but regardless, I've never been on here saying that Putin's Russia is some model I want to follow. Russia and Ukraine are both corrupt countries. Zelensky was prominent in the Panama papers because he's corrupt and Ukraine before the war was receiving major complaints about its neo Nazi regiments.....but this was all glossed over as soon as it became convenient.

Yes, Russia was also trying to influence Ukraine during 2014 but it lost out and I don't support any of that underhand brown envelope stuff. But you know what the difference is between Russia and the US? The difference is that Ukraine is on Russia's border with a lot of Russian support in the east. It has a massive self interest in not having an anti Russian state on its border, five hours drive from Moscow. The west on the other hand has no business being in Ukraine spending billions to overthrow a democratically elected government.

Something they denied and thus lied about by the way, if it weren't for whistleblowers like Benz we would still think it was all organic.



At the start of the old thread regarding this war I held a pro Ukrainian stance on this war. The posts are all still there. In fact I've never agreed with the decision Putin took. My position only changed to an anti war position here once I fully went into the context and history and likely consequences of this war.....I realised then that there was plenty of lies being told and that there were no good guys here.

Well, that's not strictly true, the good guys were those fighting for their country....lions being used by a donkey elite who now fill graveyard after graveyard because they were wasted in a war that they couldn't win.....the war should have been ended in 2022.

But while it's true that I found out that this war should and could have been easily avoided what also factored into my change of position here was a simple evaluation of how it would likely end. A war with no upsides is a bad war. I could see how the war benefited the US and China and even Russia....but I couldn't see how it had anything but disastrous costs for us.

The advantages were always with Russia. All they had....and have to do is avoid economic collapse and they win. So what happens, well Biden's inability to talk to Putin meant that he went to China and all we did was strengthen both of them.....I've said this many times, this war was conducted by western elites that I wouldn't trust to win a game of chess against a teenager.
Regardless frankly I'm tired of this constant reference back to the world war....something that those of us on the anti war side of this debate are trying to avoid while the inevitable consequences of what you're saying is that we either enlarge an existing war with Russia and get our people killed or seemingly continue fighting until Ukraine collapses.....I'm not sure what exactly you expect to happen or change.
Really sorry it makes you tired but the comparison remains valid. Am I correct in thinking you think in WW2 Britain should have formed some kind of alliance with Hitler?
 
This is Tim Davies, former RAF fighter pilot, 20 years in the military. Here he talks about the Ukraine conflict but also Starmer's plans but all within the context of what's been happening in the military and society in terms of woke and what effects it has had.....all in general over years and years under both Conservative and Labour control.

I recommend him for getting at the truth when it comes to all things military.

2TK is even more deluded than the Cornish based lunatic.
He seems to think his opinion on Ukraine matters going forward.
 
Really sorry it makes you tired but the comparison remains valid. Am I correct in thinking you think in WW2 Britain should have formed some kind of alliance with Hitler?
We disagree that it's valid.

As for my opinion on what Britain should have done about the emergence of Hitler, no personally I don't see the need for an alliance. If you want to understand this position then read Patrick Buchanan's 'Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World
'.

 
Isolation is much less dangerous than the danger of being dragged into wars which do not concern us.
(Lord Salisbury, 1896)

But what fully awakened Lord Salisbury to British isolation was the Boer War. When it broke out in 1899, many mistaken commentators thought us supported and 'speak of the British enjoying a ‘splendid isolation, surrounded and supported by our kinsfolk’. However the reality was very different and many prominent Europeans and Americans cheered British defeats. The Boer War further convinced Salisbury that, fully extended in their imperial role, the British needed to avoid conflict with the other great powers.......In other words, small wars are one thing, large wars are possibly existential and should only be countenanced under that understanding.
 
Last edited:

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top