Teddy Eagle
Member
- Country
Scotland
Can I suggest you read the definitions.Can I suggest you read your references before posting them!
“note how their meanings can sometimes overlap”
Can I suggest you read the definitions.Can I suggest you read your references before posting them!
“note how their meanings can sometimes overlap”
How do you know it isn't already?The sex is going to be amazing when you two finally get it on.
How do you know it isn't already?
Always am.Hope you’re posting this with a cigarette hanging out the corner of your mouth.
Always am.
I'm strangely touched. But you might have gathered that from the earlier post.That’s my boy.
The sex is going to be amazing when you two finally get it on.
They aren’t “revelations” at all.![]()
Newly surfaced report provides more clues on COVID outbreak source and timeline
A newly released report reveals seven U.S. military athletes showed COVID-19 symptoms after the 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan, China, contradicting official timeline. New evidence fuels debate on virus origins.www.foxnews.com
More revelations coming about the China Virus.
When discussing Covid-19, Professor Jeffrey Sachs expressed his belief that it 'very likely' originated from a US lab. The US owes China and the world an explanation.
Very informative and and seemingly authoritative. Whilst not being conclusive it does raise an interesting new angle on how the Covid pandemic originated.When discussing Covid-19, Professor Jeffrey Sachs expressed his belief that it 'very likely' originated from a US lab. The US owes China and the world an explanation.
I looked into the claims briefly at the time. Some of the research at Wuhan was indeed funded by an organisation Fauci was part of. There were US research funds funding Wuhan's work.Also didn't Fauci who was in charge of America’s response to covid turned out to be the guy who funded the creation of covid.
Have you reported it to the Police and showed them where abouts on a Doll.I'm strangely touched. But you might have gathered that from the earlier post.
I think the cooperation between the laboratories is an established fact. Which is how research work ought to be done, in my opinion.I looked into the claims briefly at the time. Some of the research at Wuhan was indeed funded by an organisation Fauci was part of. There were US research funds funding Wuhan's work.
I went through research funding and found that Fauci had signed off on the funding as a director of a research organisation using the Wuhan lab. Amongst several others. But I would agree that I doubt he forensically examined any project funding. Probably his aides or whatever chief researcher/s he funds. However, alternatively, he may have been closely involved - it's impossible for us to know without the testimony of those directly involved. And something tells me the Chinese and US governments will not be telling us anything. Have you looked into what happened to doctors/ scientists/ researchers who spoke out about Wuhan? Have a look into that. I would say it looks fishy (batty) to say the least.I think the cooperation between the laboratories is an established fact. Which is how research work ought to be done, in my opinion.
Fauci’s involvement and responsibility is quite another matter. He headed NIAID with around 4500 people working under him. I doubt he got involved in deciding where specific research projects would be carried out.