How/why are you 'sure'?The border is massive and I’m sure they had stronger points but couldn’t do it for the whole length.
How/why are you 'sure'?The border is massive and I’m sure they had stronger points but couldn’t do it for the whole length.
Couldn't read the lnik without accepting cookies so didn't. It's a mail piece so I expect it's one of those 'The young people of today!' tropes, is it?An extraordinary claim. You’re confusing the very few intelligent students these days with the rest.
Elite college students can't read an entire book: 'My jaw dropped'
Some professors at elite colleges claim they have been forced to reduce reading assignments to stop struggling students becoming overwhelmed.www.dailymail.co.uk
Young people in Europe are moving over to right and far right parties like AFD in Germany.
Not really. It’s in The Independent, Telegraph and Guardian. Still think it’s nonsense?Couldn't read the lnik without accepting cookies so didn't. It's a mail piece so I expect it's one of those 'The young people of today!' tropes, is it?
Regardless of what that august publication has to say, I'm absolutely convinced that undergraduates are not stupid. That's hardly an 'extravagant claim'.
This is how you deal with political matters non violently, unlike the right…ahem… in your own constituency as a Labour MP, now suspended…I think that you are wrong. It is clearly the case. St Yaxley-Lennon knows full well that the bully boys are there when needed just so long as he can seen to be publicly 'democratic' and lawful. This is always implied. The recent Southport (et al) violence may well have contained those who saw themselves as non violent and just ordinary citizens exercising their right of protest but you can be absolutely sure, no matter how many on here try to deny it, that there were those who were, and are, intent upon not just violence but unrest and even civil war to in pursuance of their wishes.
Not to drift too far from our shores, St Trump knew what he was doing when he told his supporters to "stand down" during the George Floyd disturbances. That is a military order, as well he knew and by uttering those words, he was assuming the role of commanding officer. Ergo, tinged by violence.
To deny the subject of violence is just not correct. You are in denial if you assert that.
About universities, this is a battleground being played out in the USA and right wing money feels compelled to export it here. The mantra is that they shouldn't be allowed to brainwash our undergraduates with left-wing dogma. We want to brainwash them with right-wing views instead. Whereas, the truth is that undergraduates are not brainwashed. They're old enough and intelligent enough to make up their own mind.
The trouble for the right is that they feel it is important to 'youthelise' their support. Right-wing views are very connected to the older generation, like a lot of those on here lol.. They'll be dying soon so it's best to get more young people on board as your future voters.
When you hear noises from the left suggesting that people who support certain causes are thick (not the brightest opinion anyway as most political causes are supported by all ranges of intelligence) I bid you double take at this video clip from the counter protest against Tommy Robinson and I humbly suggest that we aren't dealing with Einsteins' here either.
This is how you deal with political matters non violently, unlike the right…ahem… in your own constituency as a Labour MP, now suspended…
Although she looks it with the pink hair and bull ring through her nose this one isn’t that stupid but she’s training her son to be. She says her family members are on the other side. Her family get togethers are probably quite eventful…
The same way you are sure they knew about the attacks. Doesn’t take poirot for that you think ! And trying to belittle posters by dissecting every little few words ain’t big and it ain’t clever, smart arse.How/why are you 'sure'?
But as far as I can see, there's been very little in the news about Israel knowing beforehand and what they did about it. There's no need to get narky with me. If you can point me to anything to enlighten me then I'd genuinely like to see it.The same way you are sure they knew about the attacks. Doesn’t take poirot for that you think ! And trying to belittle posters by dissecting every little few words ain’t big and it ain’t clever, smart arse.
Watching it, she (the child) seems like any other who has 'discovered' a bad word and gets a reaction when she says it - whether or not she understands the full meaning of it.Yep, there is a hell of a lot of mental illness within leftist activism.
Hearing a child talk like that is horrendous.
Re read your post at 11.36 am yesterday whereby you were disturbed by the fact Israel knew about the Hamas attacks.But as far as I can see, there's been very little in the news about Israel knowing beforehand and what they did about it. There's no need to get narky with me. If you can point me to anything to enlighten me then I'd genuinely like to see it.
I'm not a smart - arse but I do want to be smarter by finding out about these things.
'Dissecting words' is what we do on here. If seeking clarification is 'dissecting every little word' then so be it.
As has been said a thousand times: the devil's in the detail.
Me too but they didn't. The relevance is why wouldn't they? Supposing they were looking for a pretext? Is that not possible? It's a moot point that I never/have never seen discussed on our news services.Re read your post at 11.36 am yesterday whereby you were disturbed by the fact Israel knew about the Hamas attacks.
I never questioned your statement as it is possible but alongside knowing; im sure Israel would have best guessed the attack zones and defended them. Maybe stupidly they thought the scum wouldn’t attack citizens just military or police and that’s why I couldn’t get your question and the relevance tbh.
No 'far right' groups took part in the Southport riots. This isn't contention it is fact, so this suggestion that Robinson was somehow 'in' on who would be there is just hearsay. I think he reacted like many others....does what he say carry more weight, sure, but as he never advocated violence I find these accusations more born of 'hatred' (as the left like to characterise things) than evidence.I think that you are wrong. It is clearly the case. St Yaxley-Lennon knows full well that the bully boys are there when needed just so long as he can seen to be publicly 'democratic' and lawful. This is always implied. The recent Southport (et al) violence may well have contained those who saw themselves as non violent and just ordinary citizens exercising their right of protest but you can be absolutely sure, no matter how many on here try to deny it, that there were those who were, and are, intent upon not just violence but unrest and even civil war to in pursuance of their wishes.
Not to drift too far from our shores, St Trump knew what he was doing when he told his supporters to "stand down" during the George Floyd disturbances. That is a military order, as well he knew and by uttering those words, he was assuming the role of commanding officer. Ergo, tinged by violence.
To deny the subject of violence is just not correct. You are in denial if you assert that.
About universities, this is a battleground being played out in the USA and right wing money feels compelled to export it here. The mantra is that they shouldn't be allowed to brainwash our undergraduates with left-wing dogma. We want to brainwash them with right-wing views instead. Whereas, the truth is that undergraduates are not brainwashed. They're old enough and intelligent enough to make up their own mind.
The trouble for the right is that they feel it is important to 'youthelise' their support. Right-wing views are very connected to the older generation, like a lot of those on here lol.. They'll be dying soon so it's best to get more young people on board as your future voters.
I think if we look at Southport,it was the case that there was a certain degree of organisation behind events and that people who were not local attended the area in order both to protest and in some cases as they fancied a bit of a tear up.No 'far right' groups took part in the Southport riots. This isn't contention it is fact, so this suggestion that Robinson was somehow 'in' on who would be there is just hearsay. I think he reacted like many others....does what he say carry more weight, sure, but as he never advocated violence I find these accusations more born of 'hatred' (as the left like to characterise things) than evidence.
Again you do this fancy reaching with Trump, suggesting that he was using codewords in his preannouncements.....that's a bit of a reach. Sure Trump has influence over his supporters, that isn't denied, but so do the Democrats.
You say I'm in denial? Oh baby boy say it isn't so! The George Floyd 'disturbances' you mention (what CNN called mostly peaceful riots) were riots that went on for 18 months, that were encouraged and not condemned by Democrats.....They actively refused to condemn Antifa would were actively involved in instigating these riots until the Dems themselves came to power....at which point they stopped. I'll remind you that these riots saw death and wholesale destruction of businesses......and he is you somehow blaming Trump for having influence over the people who weren't actually involved in the violence.....Of course he did, just as the Democrats had influence over Antifa and BLM.
I have little doubt that once Trump wins they will start again and that the Democrats will be part of that influence process which you seem eager to blame Trump for.
Your contention on outside political involvement in brainwashing youth isn't too far off the mark and through the ages both right and left have engaged on it.....However, since the sixties it's been near exclusively the left....It isn't even a question the evidence is freely available on it.
You seem a little confused on who and where the right wing is....it's not older people at all, the boomers are majority socially liberal, support for the right wing is far more amongst youth (and considering their future prospects I can see why they aren't centralists).
Here watch this video from Academic Agent going over the process of how universities and indoctrination flowed from before WW2 but was massively enabled and enlarged after it.
If they had known and did bolster certain areas it wouldn’t look very good to admit they chose the wrong places which allowed hundreds of people to get wiped out, raped and systematically tortured to death. Best to keep quiet on that !Me too but they didn't. The relevance is why wouldn't they? Supposing they were looking for a pretext? Is that not possible? It's a moot point that I never/have never seen discussed on our news services.