The bbc, again.

[Wisbech Eagle]

Ummm we all fight every day but not in a violent way. The human dictionary struggles sometimes !

The dictionary definition is to use violence to achieve your aims. It is sometimes missed used though.

 

[Common Sense Club]

Are you seriously comparing the two? Seriously?

Yes, so that you rethink your responses.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Which assumes that what they said was true. That it was discussed and cleared. Whether Prescott was alone is unknown, but he seems to be the only one sufficiently concerned to leak internal BBC communications.

Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

The BBS is a moronic inferno of far-left nut jobs who are a disgrace to Crystal Palace FC.

It makes Gary Lineker look balanced and impartial.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

The BBC's worst culprits are mostly native born Honkys to be fair.
Worth remembering if we think remigration will solve everything. We'll still be left with Hugh Edwards and Gary Neville et al to deal with.

True, Lenny Henry and Naga whatsaface are irritating fools, but not even close to the Saville league.
And Floella Benjamin was good on Play School.

​

Quite possibly, but there won't be many left there soon.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

The BBS is a moronic inferno of far-left nut jobs who are a disgrace to Crystal Palace FC.

I would like this twice if I could.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

He thinks the very the same of us; hence why I have no wish to stop him.

He's not an elected member of any political movement as far as I know. So I don't think he's making any decisions for us. Even if he was then you'd hope democracy would solve any problems.

He's just using his free speech. I very much disagree with his turn of phrase; but welcome him on the site

I couldn't care less what he thinks... As long as I don't have to read his attention seeking twaddle.

 

[Spiderman]

Having once owned a kindergarten I can assure you that it isn’t.

The kind of attitudes often shown here would have a toddler on the naughty step instantly.

Compared to the bbs!

 

[georgenorman]

Having once owned a kindergarten I can assure you that it isn’t.

The kind of attitudes often shown here would have a toddler on the naughty step instantly.

You must have needed a big step.

 

[Badger11]

Not sure if this should be in BBC or Woke thread.

Good on her for changing the script but no longer allowed facial expressions.

Who are the 20 people who complained.

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.

www.bbc.co.uk

Ironic that in the week it has leaked out that the BBC has been sitting on a damaging report about bias, with their Verify unit strangely silent about the allegations, we get this story.

As a newsreader she should not have pulled a face, that was wrong. If she had a problem with the story (I don't blame her) she should have refused to read it before going on air.

Still the BBC is all over this whilst doing nothing about the more serious allegations of bias.

 

[McAhuna]

Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.

Fair play to you for trying, but is there any point?

Lets not get conned by the facade of genteel rural respectability, the facade of a polite victim.

Someone who can play down decades of institutional child rape, someone who defends fraud, lies and deceit. Is there any point in engaging? Some are beyond saving.

It's not about right or left. Its about right or wrong.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.

Did it though give “a false picture”? Or did it remove obscuration to enable the truth to shine through?

Opinions on this obviously differ.

Mine being that it’s unarguable that the reason the storming of the Capitol occurred was wholly down to Trump. If he had not tried to overturn a democratic vote and wind up his supporters it would not have happened.

The BBC making programmes that tell such truths, unafraid of political pressures from any quarter, is what sets them apart. We need that. Others are very envious that we have it. We should be proud of the BBC as one of our last remaining truly world leading accomplishments.

So it makes me thoroughly ashamed when I read a section of our society taking every opportunity to attack something so valuable as the BBC.

People who, in the next breath, will claim to be patriots and wave the national flag to try to prove it. True patriots are proud of the BBC!

 

[HKOwen]

Fair play to you for trying, but is there any point?

Lets not get conned by the facade of genteel rural respectability, the facade of a polite victim.

Someone who can play down decades of institutional child rape, someone who defends fraud, lies and deceit. Is there any point in engaging? Some are beyond saving.

It's not about right or left. Its about right or wrong.

I agree with this except the " gentile rural respectability"

 

[Spindle]

Woke shite. Can't punish Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards but will punish this woman for being realistic and within the law

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.

www.bbc.co.uk

As if anyone other than a woman can be pregnant, and the deluded fuckwits are bothered of complaints from radical SJW mentalists

 

[McAhuna]

Woke shite. Can't punish Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards but will punish this woman for being realistic and within the law

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.

www.bbc.co.uk

As if anyone other than a woman can be pregnant, and the deluded fuckwits are bothered of complaints from radical SJW mentalists

Its amazing she got as far as fronting the news for them.

 

[McAhuna]

I agree with this except the " gentile rural respectability"

'Genteel'

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Did it though give “a false picture”? Or did it remove obscuration to enable the truth to shine through?

Opinions on this obviously differ.

Mine being that it’s unarguable that the reason the storming of the Capitol occurred was wholly down to Trump. If he had not tried to overturn a democratic vote and wind up his supporters it would not have happened.

The BBC making programmes that tell such truths, unafraid of political pressures from any quarter, is what sets them apart. We need that. Others are very envious that we have it. We should be proud of the BBC as one of our last remaining truly world leading accomplishments.

So it makes me thoroughly ashamed when I read a section of our society taking every opportunity to attack something so valuable as the BBC.

People who, in the next breath, will claim to be patriots and wave the national flag to try to prove it. True patriots are proud of the BBC!

So you agree that they altered what he said but still defend them for doing so. Apparently there's no difference in saying "I will not do something" and "I will do something" if the BBC says so.
This defence is just ridiculous and in this particular case Samuel Johnson was right in what he said about patriotism.

 

[Spindle]

So you agree that they altered what he said but still defend them for doing so. Apparently there's no difference in saying "I will not do something" and "I will do something" if the BBC says so.
This defence is just ridiculous and in this particular case Samuel Johnson was right in what he said about patriotism.

He just has double standards according to what he'd like to hear, yet talks of undermining democracy.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

Woke shite. Can't punish Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards but will punish this woman for being realistic and within the law

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.

www.bbc.co.uk

As if anyone other than a woman can be pregnant, and the deluded fuckwits are bothered of complaints from radical SJW mentalists

getting affected by the hot weather ? pregnant people ? well, i guess its good they said that. I could have got confused and thought they were talking about pregnant Elephants or Pregnant dogs. Surely hot weather would upset pregnant Polar Bears ?

And anyway pregnant men would be less likely to sink in quicksand cos they got bigger feet.

Boycott the BBC

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

Its amazing she got as far as fronting the news for them.

The BBC is clearly infested with liberal activists. Many I'm sure are in minorities of one type or another and have their own little axes to grind. Others are just indoctrinated by our leftist education system.

Have we really reached the point where a Monty Python sketch is reality?

More likely, we have a small group of people with far too much influence and exposure making it seem that way.