The bbc, again.

Wisbech Eagle said:
Which assumes that what they said was true. That it was discussed and cleared. Whether Prescott was alone is unknown, but he seems to be the only one sufficiently concerned to leak internal BBC communications.
Click to expand...
Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.
 
McAhuna said:
The BBC's worst culprits are mostly native born Honkys to be fair.
Worth remembering if we think remigration will solve everything. We'll still be left with Hugh Edwards and Gary Neville et al to deal with.

True, Lenny Henry and Naga whatsaface are irritating fools, but not even close to the Saville league.
And Floella Benjamin was good on Play School.

​

Click to expand...
Quite possibly, but there won't be many left there soon.
 
Mattconrov said:
He thinks the very the same of us; hence why I have no wish to stop him.

He's not an elected member of any political movement as far as I know. So I don't think he's making any decisions for us. Even if he was then you'd hope democracy would solve any problems.

He's just using his free speech. I very much disagree with his turn of phrase; but welcome him on the site
Click to expand...
I couldn't care less what he thinks... As long as I don't have to read his attention seeking twaddle.
 
Apollofuzz said:
Not sure if this should be in BBC or Woke thread.

Good on her for changing the script but no longer allowed facial expressions.

Who are the 20 people who complained.

www.bbc.co.uk

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
Ironic that in the week it has leaked out that the BBC has been sitting on a damaging report about bias, with their Verify unit strangely silent about the allegations, we get this story.

As a newsreader she should not have pulled a face, that was wrong. If she had a problem with the story (I don't blame her) she should have refused to read it before going on air.

Still the BBC is all over this whilst doing nothing about the more serious allegations of bias.
 
Teddy Eagle said:
Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.
Click to expand...

Fair play to you for trying, but is there any point?

Lets not get conned by the facade of genteel rural respectability, the facade of a polite victim.

Someone who can play down decades of institutional child rape, someone who defends fraud, lies and deceit. Is there any point in engaging? Some are beyond saving.

It's not about right or left. Its about right or wrong.
 
Teddy Eagle said:
Yes. It's true that the the utterly impartial BBC edited the speech to give a false picture of what it contained. That so many were exercised over what Trump said is all moot since he didn't actually say it.
Click to expand...
Did it though give “a false picture”? Or did it remove obscuration to enable the truth to shine through?

Opinions on this obviously differ.

Mine being that it’s unarguable that the reason the storming of the Capitol occurred was wholly down to Trump. If he had not tried to overturn a democratic vote and wind up his supporters it would not have happened.

The BBC making programmes that tell such truths, unafraid of political pressures from any quarter, is what sets them apart. We need that. Others are very envious that we have it. We should be proud of the BBC as one of our last remaining truly world leading accomplishments.

So it makes me thoroughly ashamed when I read a section of our society taking every opportunity to attack something so valuable as the BBC.

People who, in the next breath, will claim to be patriots and wave the national flag to try to prove it. True patriots are proud of the BBC!
 
McAhuna said:
Fair play to you for trying, but is there any point?

Lets not get conned by the facade of genteel rural respectability, the facade of a polite victim.

Someone who can play down decades of institutional child rape, someone who defends fraud, lies and deceit. Is there any point in engaging? Some are beyond saving.

It's not about right or left. Its about right or wrong.
Click to expand...
I agree with this except the " gentile rural respectability"
 
Woke shite. Can't punish Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards but will punish this woman for being realistic and within the law

www.bbc.co.uk

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

As if anyone other than a woman can be pregnant, and the deluded fuckwits are bothered of complaints from radical SJW mentalists
 
Spindle said:
Woke shite. Can't punish Jimmy Savile or Huw Edwards but will punish this woman for being realistic and within the law

www.bbc.co.uk

Martine Croxall broke rules over 'pregnant people' facial expression, BBC says

The BBC newsreader was reading out a news bulletin about research on groups most at risk in UK heatwaves.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

As if anyone other than a woman can be pregnant, and the deluded fuckwits are bothered of complaints from radical SJW mentalists
Click to expand...

Its amazing she got as far as fronting the news for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top