Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
Quite a bit I could say but I won't bore everyone.
Nevertheless, there are towns/ cities totally destroyed in Ukraine would be one point. Put them altogether and there's likely to be more destruction than Gaza overall. Yet, 10,000 dead overall. It makes me think that death tolls in Gaza really are more political than actual. I think really that backs my points pretty well. It's also quite interesting as it's a contemporary war so comparable type of targeting and ordnance in some ways. However, I can't say for sure. It isn't going to me going over and counting everyone. Nor anyone probably. It's clouded for a reason though isn't it?
The original point on casualties is: Hamas have something to gain from exaggerating - like Goebbels did for a really bad analogy. I'm trying to think of Saddam and Tariq Ali now - I think they did this too but my memory is fading?
And obviously Israel will play down civilian deaths. It isn't going to look good for them. So it isn't getting any easier to say anything certain.
I think we can say - don't believe either figure really. Which would be my opinion on it.
We know that civilians in Ukraine and Russia to a vastly smaller extent still die under rubble from bomb attacks but obviously it's a completely different kind of war where all the Ukrainians in towns and cities near the front line can simply leave for the west or centre of Ukraine.
With Gaza, it's a situation where no one wants them.
Personally if I were Israel I'd be shipping them out to the parts of Syria they are occupying. It would take a few years but if they want Gaza them the breaks.