Absolutely I can. Please find one post where I have apologised for or denied genocide because you won’t find one.
I can't find a single post where you denounce the Genocide. Hence there's no evidence of you being anti-genocide which is why I asked. Would you like to present your arguments on the subject now? As your contributions, aside from on Amsterdam, have been less than relevant.
Yes I argued about the incidents in Amsterdam because you chose to believe it was all about Israeli fans causing the trouble, which imo it clearly was not. You chose to believe you media source of choice, I chose to believe mine.
Of course I disagree with you. The argument on the Israeli side was that these were anti-jew attacks, yet prior to the Macabi fans arrival, there were no reports of Jew hunts despite there being long established Jewish population in Amsterdam. So, you choose to believe in what media tells you, I look at what they say and apply critical thinking and analysis to figure out what the truth of the matter is.
As I've said before, if you have to believe, then you don't know and you need to do more work - i.e. not be lazy.
Your arrogance is staggering, you still insist on calling those who oppose your views as lazy morons.
I've gone to lengths to provide rebuttals with evidence against the arguments that have been put in front of me. Give me one example where I've deemed an argument to be lazy and moronic without justification (and I will provide that justification).
If there is a argument which I have called lazy/moronic that you disagree with, the provide your rebuttal.
I suspect that you will find that I have consistently responded to the arguments laid in front of me. If those arguments are lazy and moronic, then I will call that out. The answer is to not make lazy and moronic arguments.
Of course, here you are insinuating that I am a lazy moron without any attempt to justify that opinion:
#450 Don’t do yourself down!
Yes I argued about the incidents in Amsterdam because you chose to believe it was all about Israeli fans causing the trouble, which imo it clearly was not.
How many 'Jew Hunts' happened in Amsterdam before the Macabi fans arrived? Did the 'hunts' occur before or after the Macabi fans committed several acts of violence and vandalism about the city?
I have condemned the acts of the vigilantes which likely exacerbated the 'trouble'.
How you can deny being anti Israel after all your diatribes on here beggars belief
Well, simply saying 'anti-' something is a broad and lazy generalisation. To help you understand, we would need to agree on a specific definition of that term. Do you want to have a go?
To help, I would say it is perfectly reasonable to be against the actions of a regime that is representative of a country, while not being against that country being there. For example, I am against the actions of the Nazis, but not against the country. You would agree that it is common for people to refer to Nazi Germany and also to Germany (for brevity) in discussions about that time in history. Eg the war against Germany. Now that does not mean I am anti-German, but anti-German regime, anti-German regime actions etc. Does that seem reasonable to you?
In the case of Israel, I am anti- the Israeli regime and its actions of committing war crimes and genocide. I would prefer a 2 state solution and peace above all and no more murdering and maiming of children (and innocents) in the tens of thousands. Does that sound reasonable? I am anti-Tory and Labour governments for their support of Israeli regime atrocities, but I am not anti-my country... do you see?