I think this thread should indeed be locked. It'll be quite an interesting time capsule to look back on one day.
It shows the trends in the majority view, that Glasner is an excellent coach upon whom we were unlikely to improve, a view largely maintained even during a run of poor form, on to widespread anger with his conduct to the point many felt he would (should) be sacked for misconduct, to an uneasy acceptance that continuing with him until the end of the season was probably the most sensible option, to a gradual thawing in the relationship, to the very high point in Leipzig. The glossy media version of the story may miss a lot of that, but it's all here.
The thread also captures some of the fine point debates about Glasner. For many he was an excellent coach who took the team to a higher level, though for some he simply benefited from having perhaps our best ever set of players. He was either very consistent and clear headed in his tactical approach, or unbearably rigid depending on how you look at it. He was either right to call out the board for not backing him, or a classic case of the manager as petulant child, demanding the club make poor financial decisions that he wouldn't be around to carry the can for. Some players developed hugely under him, though many hope at least one of two of our more expensive signings will do better under someone else.
I suppose it goes to show that there is always more to the story than might meet the eye, even with the most successful managers.