Flags.........& Politics.

[Stirlingsays]

These constant claims about “whites” really needs to be called out. Where does that claim come from? I asked your favourite AI, Grok and their answer is below. Other AIs being even more forthright. So let’s compare it with yours!

“The idea that all white people share 97% of behaviors is not supported by any credible scientific evidence. Behavior is shaped by a complex mix of genetics, environment, culture, and individual experiences, making it highly variable even within any racial or ethnic group. Race itself is a social construct, not a precise biological category, and grouping people by race to quantify shared behaviors oversimplifies human diversity.


No study or data set has established a specific percentage like 97% for behavioral similarity within any racial group. Such a claim would require rigorous, large-scale behavioral analysis across diverse contexts, which doesn’t exist. People’s actions are influenced by countless factors—upbringing, education, socioeconomic status, and personal choices—far beyond race.”

This is a low IQ response.

I was talking figuratively.

As for the idea that race is a social construct.

That's moronic.

 

[Stirlingsays]

That’s disputed. As I said. Some think it refers to the white tin spilling from the black earth. It’s lost in time.

Like your honesty.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

This is a low IQ response.

I was talking figuratively.

As for the idea that race is a social construct.

That's moronic.

So you are arguing with Grok, an AI that you appear to favour and one that is generally regarded as favouring more right sources than others.

You describe Grok as making both a low IQ response and another as moronic, whilst describing your own, very specific, statement as figurative!

I witnessed you squirm before but that’s taking squirming to Everest level height.

You quoted Grok again yourself, extensively today. Is that quote now to be regarded as low IQ or moronic? Perhaps you think all AI responses are low IQ and moronic and only you knows how things really are?

 

[Stirlingsays]

So you are arguing with Grok, an AI that you appear to favour and one that is generally regarded as favouring more right sources than others.

You describe Grok as making both a low IQ response and another as moronic, whilst describing your own, very specific, statement as figurative!

I witnessed you squirm before but that’s taking squirming to Everest level height.

You quoted Grok again yourself, extensively today. Is that quote now to be regarded as low IQ or moronic? Perhaps you think all AI responses are low IQ and moronic and only you knows how things really are?

Another low IQ response.

If you put something to Grok as factual then of course it's going to respond that the 97 percent figure is wrong, because that is probably accurate. I was being figurative and anyone with brains could have figured that out.

As for race being a social construct this is again another moronic play on words.

Grok itself recognises the genetic differences between populations and what you are accessing is a whole lot of programmed in socio-political waffle only popular in the recent politicalised environment.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Another low IQ response.

If you put something to Grok as factual then of course it's going to respond that the 97 percent figure is wrong, because that is probably accurate. I was being figurative and anyone with brains could have figured that out.

As for race being a social construct this is again another moronic play on words.

Grok itself recognises the genetic differences between populations and what you are accessing is a whole lot of programmed in socio-political waffle only popular in the recent politicalised environment.

You weren’t. You made a definitive statement without any qualifications. As Grok, and my brain, can easily figure out!

Race being a social construct doesn’t play with words in any way at all. It’s a very straightforward statement of fact that is repeated in every AI that is asked the same question. That you don’t want that to be true because it doesn’t match your own prejudices and narrative is obvious but doesn’t change reality.

Wanting an AI only to access sources that think like you do is what Andrew Torba is up to. Why don’t you go and participate in his echo chamber?

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

This is a low IQ response.

I was talking figuratively.

As for the idea that race is a social construct.

That's moronic.

I think the issue is with the term. Race is not scientific terminology. Science chooses to lump all of humanity together and call it a species.

Despite this, it is clear that humans are divided into distinct subgroups based on genetic differences, likely caused primarily by geographic separation and pre historic interbreeding with other now extinct hominid species.

Needless to say, there are many other abstractions that humans invent to divide each other or to create commonality.

The left likes to play with words and statistics to fudge reality. It's all they have.

 

[Stirlingsays]

You weren’t. You made a definitive statement without any qualifications. As Grok, and my brain, can easily figure out!

Race being a social construct doesn’t play with words in any way at all. It’s a very straightforward statement of fact that is repeated in every AI that is asked the same question. That you don’t want that to be true because it doesn’t match your own prejudices and narrative is obvious but doesn’t change reality.

Wanting an AI only to access sources that think like you do is what Andrew Torba is up to. Why don’t you go and participate in his echo chamber?

Amusingly your obsession with Torba is just more evidence of your radicalisation. You seem to be the only person who regularly brings him up on here.

AI is useful, though not perfect. It's dataset is formed from human sources and thus contains all the benefits of that plus its issues.

The rest of what you write is the usual utter drivel.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

humans are divided into distinct subgroups based on genetic differences, likely caused primarily by geographic separation and pre historic interbreeding with other now extinct hominid species.

The left likes to play with words and statistics to fudge reality. It's all they have.

when you tell the Left that some sub-groups of humans are brilliant at digesting cow's milk (the irish) or at living at altitude (the Nepalese )....those Lefties lose their sh1.t

The idea of differences is totally anathema to their whole egalitarian world-view.

Flags.......some flags for Olympic Sprinters, some other flags for Olympic swimmers.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Amusingly your obsession with Torba is just more evidence of your radicalisation. You seem to be the only person who regularly brings him up on here.

AI is useful, though not perfect. It's dataset is formed from human sources and thus contains all the benefits of that plus its issues.

The rest of what you write is the usual utter drivel.

I bring up Torba because he typifies all that’s wrong with Christian Nationalists and their desire to achieve domination in the USA. He is also unapologetically anti semetic.

He is extremely right wing, allows awful ideas to be spread on his platform without any attempt at moderation, simply because he believes in free speech having no limits. He is the least Christian person I have ever encountered, yet can quote from the Bible at will.

In short he represents a great deal of the sickness in the USA.

That you consider your opinion to be superior to the wisdom collected by many AI engines is extremely instructive of your considerable capacity for self delusion and aggrandisement.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

when you tell the Left that some sub-groups of humans are brilliant at digesting cow's milk (the irish) or at living at altitude (the Nepalese )....those Lefties lose their sh1.t

The idea of differences is totally anathema to their whole egalitarian world-view.

Flags.......some flags for Olympic Sprinters, some other flags for Olympic swimmers.

You don’t need to restrict that to the “left”! It applies to everyone.

What doesn’t apply is that you can divide people up by the colour of their skin. Or any other racial characteristic.

Any group living in Ireland, or Nepal, given enough time and generations, would evolve the capacities described. Wherever they originated. Whatever they looked like. It is only impacted by their environment.