• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Censorship and Social Media

First you get censorship with a knife or a gun. Then you get self-censorship.

Wasn't it Edmund Burke who said something along the lines of "in order for evil to prevail, you only need the good men to stand idly by"

 
Last edited:
So Darwkins felt he was afforded protection by the system(s) he was critical of. If other system(s) pose a threat to his well-being, he is not critical at all. Which undermines his ability to do his job.

My thoughts on self-regulation of (social media) speech, particularly related to groups that feel empowered enough to facilitate a kind of "mob justice" in regulation. You might find this on other forums where your opinion doesn't match the mainstream, either by language, or political views. You might find yourself ostracised by Moderators, unless you align yourself with the forum group-think.
Because social media also permits more informal talk, less-considered, with grammatical errors and a more casual wording, in it's natural form there are many fault-lines to expose for those of a more analytical disposition. Easier to manipulate interpretation to something far from the authors original intent.
The mob mentality of self-regulation is illustrated in Orwell's 1984, with anyone being a possible informer to the Thought Police.
 
First you get censorship with a knife or a gun. Then you get self-censorship.

Wasn't it Edmund Burke who said something along the lines of "in order for evil to prevail, you only need the good men to stand idly by"

This is only a problem with those on the right who are free speech absolutists.

Dawkins has every reason not to comment. He also has every reason to treasure living in a culture which has evolved in a Christian environment. There is no need to explain why, because it’s obvious.

That has nothing to do with his atheism and rejection, not just of Christianity, but of all religious beliefs. He has always though acknowledged the values they bring to many people.

That he can freely criticise Christianity, but not others, speaks about those values. He admires much of Christian culture. He just doesn’t believe the myths. We must surmise what he feels about others, but sometimes silence is every bit as powerful as words.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top