• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Woke is alive and well

Spiderman said:
www.dailymail.co.uk

Police forces let officers carry multiple cards for various genders

EXCL: Police forces are allowing trans officers to carry multiple warrant cards depending on the gender they choose on a given day.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
Typical Daily Mail. Winding up the impressionable. You need to look past the headlines and the emotional phrases and look for a few facts. Like this from the police themselves:-

“One card displays the individual's force number and surname only, while the other has their force number and full name”

Simply allowing someone to decide whether to keep their first name private is hardly a big deal. As to the idea that a biological man would be permitted to strip search a woman just because they now identify as a woman fails to recognise that management and supervision protect people and would in those circumstances. I seriously doubt whether there are many police officers in this category anyway.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Typical Daily Mail. Winding up the impressionable. You need to look past the headlines and the emotional phrases and look for a few facts. Like this from the police themselves:-

“One card displays the individual's force number and surname only, while the other has their force number and full name”

Simply allowing someone to decide whether to keep their first name private is hardly a big deal. As to the idea that a biological man would be permitted to strip search a woman just because they now identify as a woman fails to recognise that management and supervision protect people and would in those circumstances. I seriously doubt whether there are many police officers in this category anyway.
Click to expand...
Bit of a predictable first paragraph, your perogative to call me impressionable. As someone who had a warrant card for many years, My warrant card only had my number and never my name, there is no need to have any name on them, as a number is unique to that Officer, so absolutely no reason to have 2 cards. One Officer in this category is one too many in my opinion
 
Spiderman said:
....... your perogative to call me impressionable.
Click to expand...

its a bit ironic. You have been accused of being impressionable. Accused By somebody who seemingly has swallowed the woke BBC narrative ...hook, line, sinker and entire fishing rod.

'Woke' is all about opinions and a fake manufactured victimhood. It is ironic how Woke lavishes attention to its chosen victims ( women, LGBTQ, BLM, Climate change dogma, refugees ) and yet seems to totally ignore real hardship groups ( the elderly, the sick, terminal illness, wheelchair or NeuroDiversity, the working poor, suicide high risk groups, alcoholism & drug addictions, road accident victims ).


And in the case of Women, LGBTQ, or BLM......we can easily identify many very wealthy & successful examples of these. So hardly the victims then ?
 
We often have stories about woke stuff which most of us can say doesn't directly impact us e.g. lesbian celebrity has a row with a Trans person (so what).

This article however is about real world consequences.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Black men more likely to die from prostate cancer, charity warns

Prostate Cancer UK says ministers have a 'moral imperative' to change the rules so GPs can proactively speak to at risk groups about screening for the disease.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Equality does not exist in medicine. A family member specialises in finding osteoporosis amongst patients admitted to hospital and then ensuring they are diagnosed and treated. Guess what she focuses on the elderly, is she being ageist?

For many years research into suicides by Trans people was blocked due to fears over Transphobia and threats by activists. How many people died needlessly.

Hopefully common-sense will prevail here.
 
Glazier#1 said:
Question. Seriously. In your ideal society, would homosexuality be allowed, illegal, tolerated?
Click to expand...

Yes, it would be legal.

However, I would have never have legalised gay marriage....civil partnerships were fair, but marriage was never intended to be for same sex couples.

I'm someone who agrees with section 28 that Thatcher brought in and if I were in charge that would be re-imposed on institutions that are completely saturated with leftists....which is all of them and which Thatcher and other Conservative administrations did little to change.

Essentially attitudes towards sexuality would go back to the eighties, tolerated and protected but not promoted nor funded by state institutions.

Its promotion, alongside with anti natalist attitudes and modern feminism has damaged the birth rate to suicidal levels and thus the future creation of poverty and other problems.
 
Last edited:
Stirlingsays said:
Yes, it would be legal.

However, I would have never have legalised gay marriage....civil partnerships were fair, but marriage was never intended to be for same sex couples.

I'm someone who agrees with section 28 that Thatcher brought in and if I were in charge that would be re-imposed on institutions that are completely saturated with leftists....which is all of them and which Thatcher and other Conservative administrations did little to change.

Essentially attitudes towards sexuality would go back to the eighties, tolerated and protected but not promoted nor funded by state institutions.

Its promotion, alongside with anti natalist attitudes and modern feminism has damaged the birth rate to suicidal levels and thus the future creation of poverty and other problems.
Click to expand...
Exactly - well put. What we need is a return to basic decency and morality.
 
Meanwhile, back at the PC police headquarters.

" The head of the Met's Black Police Association (MBPA) has been found to have committed gross misconduct over a group chat where racist, sexist and inappropriate messages were sent and received.
Insp Charles Ehikioya was in a WhatsApp chat with former officer Carlo Francisco where the offensive messages were shared.
The officer had denied the allegations against him and said the claims were fabricated or falsely attributed to him because of his race or position as chair of the MBPA.
A panel found his conduct amounted to a breach of the standards of professional behaviour and said it was "so serious as to potentially justify dismissal". (BBC website, 10,1,25)

www.bbc.co.uk

Met Police: Gross misconduct ruling over officer's WhatsApp messages

Insp Charles Ehikioya's conduct was so serious as to potentially justify dismissal, a panel finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top