DANGERCLOSE
Member
- Location
- London
- Country
- England
I see what you’re saying, and the way you put it I wouldn’t be surprised if he ordered the murder of every white first born child. But this doesn’t make sense for a few reasons.Starmer is only interested in passing legislation. The majority he has is so large, with a significant amount of MP's who are literally incapable of pissing without being told to by the Whips, that he could pass a law ordering the murder of every first born child and it would sail through.
And killing old people, who are still predominantly white, is again all wins for him. He wants us back in the EU. We left because of the elderly voting. Its win win for him.
With zero hyperbole to this either. Starmer does not care about the fate of people who will not vote in the way he wants them to. All politicians are to some extent sociopaths but Starmer is in a league of his own.
The cut off is too low. And they called the tories out of touch.The WFA does need to be changed, means tested to income for less well off OAPs and those on seriously low incomes, but it's the way they've done it. No consultation, no risk assessment, just axed it and claiming pension credit is the answer. From speaking to diehard labourites in the North West , Starmer is now a name synonymous with Thatcher.
How could you means test 10 million for less than £1.5 billion. It would take an admin team of 100s with all of the extra software and ancillary IT.The WFA does need to be changed, means tested to income for less well off OAPs and those on seriously low incomes, but it's the way they've done it. No consultation, no risk assessment, just axed it and claiming pension credit is the answer. From speaking to diehard labourites in the North West , Starmer is now a name synonymous with Thatcher.
Yeah this has been known for years, until Starmer turns up and thinks he has the answer, only he totally fooks it up, turning more people against him within 2 months. You couldn’t make it up. Not only that - his MP’s tell some embarrassing lies that not doing it will crash the economy and the currency. What a joke.How could you means test 10 million for less than £1.5 billion. It would take an admin team of 100s with all of the extra software and ancillary IT.
I suppose it would help fill those prison spaces made available today for the old geriatrics who fill out the forms wrong and commit fraud. Two years minimum 😂
I have never been so anti hmg. Even when Blair, brown or kinnock were in powerYeah this has been known for years, until Starmer turns up and thinks he has the answer, only he totally fooks it up, turning more people against him within 2 months. You couldn’t make it up. Or only that but his MP’s tell some embarrassing lies that not doing it will crash the economy and the currency. What a joke.
Not as funny as checking out a few old people who you don’t give a toss about.Kinnock was never in power.......hilarious stuff.
Just watch immigration grow more like.This lot will end up being classed as the worst Government in living memory at the end of their tenure - and previous rubbish takes a lot of beating.
These first few weeks will absolutely not be forgotten.
Labour's hope is that the people that they help will always vote for them and that they outnumber the rest of us.
Just watch the State grow to ensure that happens!
Have you ever seen the forms and proofs that you have to submit to apply for this? It's no wonder a lot of people don't bother..........Why don't people understand this winter fuel payment withdrawal is 100% the fault of the previous government.
The 89 gazillion black hole left the Govt with no alternative but to implement this policy.
There are an estimated 800,000 people who could claim pension credit but have not done so. It wouldn't take to many of these to act for this policy not only to be wrong on many levels but would also end up costing money.
The optics are terrible, but more terrible is the probability there will be deaths this winter that would not otherwise have occurred as pensioners in poverty do not turn on heating, a probelm MP's don't have with their second homes.
Ideological madness, the tenure of this Govt is going to be miserable.
Meanwhile Rachel Reeves has claimed £3700 in heating expenses for her MP home, if you voted labour I hope you are happy, a party that sends billions abroad, or gives huge pay rises, but Starmer said it" i am here for workers" clearly vulnerable pensioners are expendable and a nuisance to Labour. Labour MPs just voting to save their own jobs rather than listen to the electorate.
This was hers and their 2nd homes I assume?Don't do as I do...
Reeves claimed £4,400 in energy support before axing winter fuel payments
Chancellor and Labour MPs used over £400,000 of taxpayer cash to heat their homeswww.telegraph.co.uk