eaglesdare
Member
- Country
England
Is she still in a job?
If they can charge that much in the US it just proves how valuable it is.So when it suits the BBC adverts and subscription is okay.
![]()
BBC launches paywall in US for website and app
US-based users will have to pay $49.99 (£36) a year for access to most BBC News content.www.bbc.co.uk
Only those from the extreme right of UK opinion could think like that.The BBC website is so far left it's a disgrace to the license fee.
All they seem to do is obsess over progressive talking points and highlight the left's absurd victories.
Not until anyone starts paying.If they can charge that much in the US it just proves how valuable it is.
See how many subscribers they get then deduct that total from the licence feeNot until anyone starts paying.
Presumably they have done the research to determine what the market will accept.Not until anyone starts paying.
They've done a poll? That's alright then; they're never wrong.Presumably they have done the research to determine what the market will accept.
No, they will have done research. Modelling and test marketing.They've done a poll? That's alright then; they're never wrong.
Time will tell how efficacious their research was.No, they will have done research. Modelling and test marketing.
She needs to touch a few people up and get her payoff.The finger is being pointed at Naga Munchetty for the ongoing troubles at BBC Breakfast Time.
Of course I have no idea about the allegations against her or her boss. However as a rule of thumb I generally look to see who defends them and I don't mean the PR department or someone on social media whose never met her.
I may have missed it but there seems to be a lack of colleagues and luvvies coming out in her support.
Makes you wonder.
I live in Greece and if I had to start paying to read their news content then it would be the last time. I would find other sources for news.If they can charge that much in the US it just proves how valuable it is.
Clearly all on a jolly. The Director General was there himself.The BBC outputting excuses for why they allowed that Two Bob act to perform live to the nation.
I would suggest that if they had had fifty percent of their workforce not be left wing...which would be representative of the nation (which they considered as an option years ago and rejected) then what happened in that Glastonbury coverage would have never happened.
The BBC only cares about itself and its supporters. It doesn't give a feck and in fact looks down on half the country who aren't them.
![]()
BBC staff to 'step back' from duties over Glastonbury Bob Vylan row
No "high risk" music acts will be broadcast live in the future after Bob Vylan's Glastonbury set.www.bbc.co.uk
Cornish nonsense!!Only those from the extreme right of UK opinion could think like that.
I, and everyone in my circle, think it goes out of its way to remain balanced.
This made me smile! (That poor old 'Overton Window' must be near shattering).
Tomorrow belongs to Alan Partridge!