Palace potentially denied entry to Europa League?

[Jason Smith]

Just read that our coefficient for winning the FA Cup is the same as Plymouth's for their league finish.

This must be how Prince Harry feels when he chats to his brother.

Or when Marinakis chats with Nunos!

 

[BromleyMonkey]

How would they retaliate? A barrage of Toblerones?

Or they’d bomb us with their smelliest cheese

 

[Part Time James]

How would they retaliate? A barrage of Toblerones?

Making every single item on their army knives a nail file.

 

[Sansbup]

I hope this is allowed, but there is a superb post on another CPFC forum, which summarises the situation superbly:-




This needs wide circulation, preferably to maintain stream media and everyone involved.

 

[palace_in_frogland]

Just read that our coefficient for winning the FA Cup is the same as Plymouth's for their league finish.

This must be how Prince Harry feels when he chats to his brother.

They’ve both got their own Hoe…

 

[Spindle]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1940891504450670658

It'll be found under some Persian carpet

 

[Spindle]

That was my take. One, will the bank transfer not have to wait completion of the sale to Johnson? And two, when in funds, what stops Tex from trousering the lot?

So it would be smart of Palace to ensure that the deal is done too late for them to meet that deadline anyway

 

[Spindle]

Meh. I'm over it. Get one of those massive ones from the airport - one of those lasts my missus a good 10 minutes.

Ten minutes peace, money well spent fella

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Ten minutes peace, money well spent fella

Ten minutes v several hours of moaning and remorse? Not the best deal going.

 

[whatton]

Brondby have a higher coefficient than us. As far as I'm aware, we won't replace them - we won't be eligible.

The rule that sorts out the order of precedence regarding Palace/Lyon/Brondby has been posted on a number of occasions in this thread, but it is clearly set out in post 29 on page 2 under section 5.02.

Initially we were concerned with the situation regarding Palace v Lyon, and indeed this is still the main concern. Before the possible issue of Lyon being relegated from Ligue 1 came up, if there was a genuine conflict between Palace and Lyon under 5.01 then the issue was that Lyon would have priority under 5.02 section 2

 

[est1905]

didn't Textor just get £190 mil from the sale of his shares to Johnson? And there's money from the sales of players to Rottingham Forest. Don't know about clearance time though.

As I have said numerous times I am pretty certain that 1. Textor would not be allowed to use the money from Palace share sale and 2. There are strong rumours he has it earmarked to buy another English club and has no intention of using it for Lyon even if he were allowed to.

 

[est1905]

I believe Lyon have until the 14th to appeal,so don't think we'll hear anything today, even though last week i heard they have 7 days to appeal.

They cant appeal an appeal. This current process IS their appeal. Lose this and they are down.

 

[ex hibitionist]

I hope this is allowed, but there is a superb post on another CPFC forum, which summarises the situation superbly:-

View attachment 1449
View attachment 1450

This needs wide circulation, preferably to maintain stream media and everyone involved.

a key point in all this is that there is a difference between 'codes of practice' which are the legally binding actions you must take to comply with rules/laws and 'guidance' or 'guidelines' which are merely suggestions or advice and are NOT legally binding. Reading that article it does seem we have a solid case that we did comply or at least believed we were complying with the rules based on a logical interpretation, and that if we weren't compliant before we certainly are now, and some of these rulings fall under guidance rather than codes of practice. The Cup Final was not some parochial event, we beat the then reigning world club champions, it's global news, certainly a win that all of Europe will have stood up and noticed, given the vagueness of their rulings and the clear double standards there'll be absolute f*cking uproar if UEFA bar us, they'll be praying Lyon lose their appeal.

 

[silvertop]

a key point in all this is that there is a difference between 'codes of practice' which are the legally binding actions you must take to comply with rules/laws and 'guidance' or 'guidelines' which are merely suggestions or advice and are NOT legally binding. Reading that article it does seem we have a solid case that we did comply or at least believed we were complying with the rules based on a logical interpretation, and that if we weren't compliant before we certainly are now, and some of these rulings fall under guidance rather than codes of practice. The Cup Final was not some parochial event, we beat the then reigning world club champions, it's global news, certainly a win that all of Europe will have stood up and noticed, given the vagueness of their rulings and the clear double standards there'll be absolute f*cking uproar if UEFA bar us, they'll be praying Lyon lose their appeal.

Is precisely the point.

And why our closed season business and new season preparation is in abeyance pending that wretched appeal.

 

[Spiderman]

And the Palace dollies !

I went out with one of them 😉

 

[Spiderman]

didn't Textor just get £190 mil from the sale of his shares to Johnson? And there's money from the sales of players to Rottingham Forest. Don't know about clearance time though.

I believe any money from Eagle Holdings cannot be used, therefore irrelevant. Our problem seems to be Michele Kang

 

[Spiderman]

I've just found this article dated 9 May. Re: Chelsea and Strasburg. Although they had been talking with UEFA since January about prospective MCO violations. Chelsea hadn't actually done anything by this date. It looks like they were waiting to see if they qualified first before taking any action. How is this ok for them and not for us?

Chelsea & Strasbourg prepare for Uefa multi-club rule changes if both qualify for same competition

Chelsea make plans to be compliant with Uefa regulations after Strasbourg's surprise challenge to qualify for the Champions League.

share.google

Because they know, whatever, that Strasbourg would throw the last game against relegation threatened Le Havre. Watch the highlights

 

[Spiderman]

Meh. I'm over it. Get one of those massive ones from the airport - one of those lasts my missus a good 10 minutes.

It must be the weather but I had naughty thoughts about this 🤣

 

[Part Time James]

It must be the weather but I had naughty thoughts about this 🤣

The Toblerone or his wife or the combination?

 

[Spiderman]

As I have said numerous times I am pretty certain that 1. Textor would not be allowed to use the money from Palace share sale and 2. There are strong rumours he has it earmarked to buy another English club and has no intention of using it for Lyon even if he were allowed to.

But won’t do anything until this is sorted. Appears he wants to f*** Parish over