• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Of-Communists

Stirlingsays

Member
Country
England
These guys are one of the reasons why we live in a far less free country.

They are a by product of pure neocommunism and even before this 'judgement', had been passing awful political requirements of broadcast media.

Personally I'm of the mind that they....and their legion of neocommunist soy boys are determined to smash anything right of the kind of cucked neoliberal 'conservative' party of Sunak/May/Cameron by essentially persecuting right wing politics via these legal authorities.

My advice to companies like GBNews is to stop thinking that the British judicial system is anything more than a forum for their enemies anymore.....it's not objective and it's filled with political bias.

I say move off shore and let the naked truth of these neocommunists be obvious to the normie in the street......Make their authoritarianism manifest.....GBNews is little more than a gate keeping service on the right anyway.
 
Last edited:
the fundamental Left-Right argument comes down to 'who will be paying for all the childcare'

- the taxpayer ?
or
- the bloke who fathered the kids ?


Look to Sweden if you want to see a f...cked up Commie society. Especially the ghetto neighbourhoods of Malmo - a place that makes Thornton Heath look like Tunbridge Wells.

There has never been a successful Commie State nor Society. You may as well hand over Government-control of the State to a bunch of Reality TV dancers.

 
Last edited:
the fundamental Left-Right argument comes down to 'who will be paying for all the childcare'

- the taxpayer ?
or
- the bloke who fathered the kids ?


Look to Sweden if you want to see a f...cked up Commie society. Especially the ghetto neighbourhoods of Malmo.
I could reply: look to USA if you want to see a mucked up pure capitalist society. Especially the awful ghetto neighbourhoods of Los Angeles.
 
I could reply: look to USA if you want to see a mucked up pure capitalist society. Especially the awful ghetto neighbourhoods of Los Angeles.

yes, you do have a point. Although i reckon the answer is complex. Neither Washington nor the commies then ?

The best societies are the low crime places with traditional values. Much of Latin America, India, and Eastern Europe. Western Europe & the US are a bit of a mess. As is Commie Cuba.
 
I could reply: look to USA if you want to see a mucked up pure capitalist society. Especially the awful ghetto neighbourhoods of Los Angeles.

Pure capitalist? Those ghetto neighbourhoods are all on welfare....Just how capitalist is that dude?

The correct word is neoliberal.

There hasn't been pure capitalism for a long time.
 
Pure capitalist? Those ghetto neighbourhoods are all on welfare....Just how capitalist is that dude?

The correct word is neoliberal.

There hasn't been pure capitalism for a long time.
Welfare destroys Civilisation.

the decadence just before the 'Fall of Rome'.....something similar. Everybody wanting somebody else to do the working & fighting. All too busy drinking to be bothered themselves.

When people are more concerned about what they can take out of a society, than contributing.......eventually the society dies.

Communism always fails. And Neo-Liberalism has also the seeds of its own destruction.....money for nothing and your chicks for free.
 
Last edited:
Welfare destroys Civilisation.

the decadence just before the 'Fall of Rome'.....something similar. Everybody wanting somebody else to do the working & fighting. All too busy drinking to be bothered themselves.

When people are more concerned about what they can take out of a society, than contributing.......eventually the society dies.

Communism always fails. And Neo-Liberalism has also the seeds of its own destruction.....money for nothing and your chicks for free.

I agree with the general point but let's not forget that welfare started off to avoid terrible but avoidable outcomes for society. So welfare is pensions, NHS, child benefits, disability payments....and I'm not talking about those who are conning, but people who would otherwise be dying early otherwise......I agree with you up to a point but I don't think a version of returning to Victorian economics would be an answer.

Welfare even happened with Hitler in Germany and he was a social Darwinist.

However, I agree that what has happened with certain budgets has got out of control.....but that's been true of the system since the nineties.
 
Last edited:
Welfare destroys Civilisation.

the decadence just before the 'Fall of Rome'.....something similar. Everybody wanting somebody else to do the working & fighting. All too busy drinking to be bothered themselves.

When people are more concerned about what they can take out of a society, than contributing.......eventually the society dies.

Communism always fails. And Neo-Liberalism has also the seeds of its own destruction.....money for nothing and your chicks for free.
Yup. Said it all.

A return to Victorian values. Fantastically rich, the nobility, slums, profit, death at work, disease, profit.


Not What I would wish for at all. It's your Utopia. Good luck with that one. 👍
 
Welfare destroys Civilisation.

the decadence just before the 'Fall of Rome'.....something similar. Everybody wanting somebody else to do the working & fighting. All too busy drinking to be bothered themselves.

When people are more concerned about what they can take out of a society, than contributing.......eventually the society dies.

Communism always fails. And Neo-Liberalism has also the seeds of its own destruction.....money for nothing and your chicks for free.
You see what I mean, Stirling? 'Commie' again: loosely pitched. Is this 'commie' on the same lines as you with your 'neo-liberal' commie? Probably not as we hear that 'communism never works'. He speaks of communist Russia, China et al and is not referring to your definition of neo-liberalism.

Crystalo, you have the same views as those 'bah humbug' characters in A Christmas Carol who refuse to give charitable donations prior to Christmas: Bah! Let the poor look after themselves - they deserve it.

What a horrible world. Only my opinion, of course but your world is the real horror. Unless you're lucky enough to be one of the landed rich or own the employees. Ugh!
 
Yup. Said it all.

A return to Victorian values. Fantastically rich, the nobility, slums, profit, death at work, disease, profit.


Not What I would wish for at all. It's your Utopia. Good luck with that one. 👍
How much would the welfare bill be reduced if we didn't have mass immigration and an endless stream of illegals being housed?

Governments created these problems and the hard working pay for them.

This is not Victorian Britain. Our country is no longer that rich, and it has a much larger population despite women having far fewer children.
The state should cater for indigenous people, not half the rest of the world, but it operates on a false premise. One that obfuscates the real motives behind policy.

People are getting poorer. Growth is at a trickle. We are at the mercy of large cooperations, banks and energy producers. They don't care that our societies are crumbling as long as they make bigger profits.
The workforce is being propped up by immigrants because there are so many pressures on people that stop them having larger families. It is a downward spiral towards disaster.

Expect your taxes to keep rising.
 
You see what I mean, Stirling? 'Commie' again: loosely pitched. Is this 'commie' on the same lines as you with your 'neo-liberal' commie? Probably not as we hear that 'communism never works'. He speaks of communist Russia, China et al and is not referring to your definition of neo-liberalism.

Crystalo, you have the same views as those 'bah humbug' characters in A Christmas Carol who refuse to give charitable donations prior to Christmas: Bah! Let the poor look after themselves - they deserve it.

What a horrible world. Only my opinion, of course but your world is the real horror. Unless you're lucky enough to be one of the landed rich or own the employees. Ugh!
The neo communism I spoke of more relates to social issues and I related what they were in an earlier post to your good self the other day. However, what the guys are going on about here is economic policy towards welfare. I think Hrolf's post sums it up, it's not so much about welfare itself but what it's spent on and the fact that liberalism both neo and social has reduced the west's birth rates to suicidal levels.....and its immigration solutions for that destroy the west anyway.

Wasn't our fault dude....We never supported these crappy short sighted ideologies.
 
You see what I mean, Stirling? 'Commie' again: loosely pitched. Is this 'commie' on the same lines as you with your 'neo-liberal' commie? Probably not as we hear that 'communism never works'. He speaks of communist Russia, China et al and is not referring to your definition of neo-liberalism.

Crystalo, you have the same views as those 'bah humbug' characters in A Christmas Carol who refuse to give charitable donations prior to Christmas: Bah! Let the poor look after themselves - they deserve it.

What a horrible world. Only my opinion, of course but your world is the real horror. Unless you're lucky enough to be one of the landed rich or own the employees. Ugh!
Probably but it doesn’t stop me buying a meal deal for the big issue sellers outside Tesco or other stores. But don’t let that cloud your opinions !
 
Probably but it doesn’t stop me buying a meal deal for the big issue sellers outside Tesco or other stores. But don’t let that cloud your opinions !
Probably but it depends whether you think that person should be a position to be selling The Big Issue to survive or whether we think it is the right of everyone to have shelter.

Maslow.

I don't see how my judgement is clouded.

Do you, too, believe in no welfare, then?
 
Lets take a random sample of 1,000 live births in the UK. what proportion are born to taxpayers ? whatever the answer, it is too low.

That is why the West has hit skid-row. welfare dependency now spanning two, three and sometimes 4 generations. People who Cannot work, will not work. Yet all having big families.

The lumbering slave taxpayer, carrying the rocks, getting ridden like a Donkey.....a nation of kids raised by Daddy government.

Commie, neo liberal , capitalist......just labels. Communist China has far less spongers than the UK or Western Europe.
 
Last edited:
Probably but it depends whether you think that person should be a position to be selling The Big Issue to survive or whether we think it is the right of everyone to have shelter.

Maslow.

I don't see how my judgement is clouded.

Do you, too, believe in no welfare, then?
How come immigrants get housed free for years and our homeless don’t.
Just saying !
 
cos Mr Smith, 67 , alcoholic & living in a tent.......he has White Privilege. Probably descended from a slave owner. He isnt pregnant or raising ten kids so his needs are irrelevant.

It’s not my fault I’m white.
One of natures great things is your parents determine your colour.
I’m proud to be white as blacks are proud to be black. It’s inside with attitude, aptitude and effort. If you have none then get f@@@@@d and leave me alone.
😂
 
cos Mr Smith, 67 , alcoholic & living in a tent.......he has White Privilege. Probably descended from a slave owner. He isnt pregnant or raising ten kids so his needs are irrelevant.

Growing up I was so grateful for my white privilege.

If I had been unlucky I could have been brought up in a council slum having to share a bed with my younger brother and never having new clothes or holidays. I could also have gone to a dustbin state school where no one had ever gone to university.

Boy was I lucky that wasn't me, I had white privilege, oh hang on that was me.

Ironically my best mate is Nigerian, his dad was a big cheese in banking so he grew up in a posh house in Dulwich, pity he never had the advantages I had in life. 😀
 
Back
Top