Marc Guéhi

The Guardian (I know) is quoting multiple Liverpool fans who don't want Guehi there because he is 'homophobic'. Of course, that will change if he joins
 
Sky now claiming that Guehi dependent on Igor Julio.

For me, that would be a joke.
 
pssguy said:
The Guardian (I know) is quoting multiple Liverpool fans who don't want Guehi there because he is 'homophobic'. Of course, that will change if he joins
Click to expand...
Suddenly taking the moral high ground. I don't recall Robbie Fowler's gesture being a problem for the scousers.
 
I personally think selling Guehi with the squad we have will be the biggest mistake Parish has made during his tenure. There are far too many bad possibilities that could come from this that at least one of them is almost bound to happen
 
Booted Eagle said:
SSN saying deal may well rest with the Spammers who r trying to gazump us for the Weed loanee Igor. Take this if true n Guehi stays.
Click to expand...
I cannot believe that Igor is a replacement for Guehi.

First Sky say it's Pavlovic, and when that is apparently going nowhere they say Igor.

I smell deadline day bullshit.
 
eritheagle said:
I read earlier that igor and cavard signings have no bearing on guehi.
Click to expand...
It all seems like nonsense to keep people interested.
That is the name of the game in the football media.
 
Liverpool want the player.

OG wants to keep him this season and bed in a worthy successor who joins either this window, the Jan window, or worst case the beginning of the next summer window where there is at least a preseason.

Parish/the club want to extract value from the player and that means selling before contract expiry, or getting MG to sign a new contract.

There are no signs MG is keen to sign a new contract. There are signs MG want to ensure he has a free run at making the England squad, whether that is at Palace or Liverpool.

No other clubs seem to be in for him.

The more I look at it, the more a sale and loan back would make sense for all parties:

The player gets to stay at Palace and captain. He is a first name on the team sheet and a shoe in for England if he stays fit and maintains his form. There is no risk of getting scapegoated at a new club or left out after a few poor games, unlike at Liverpool where they have 4 CBs already. He also gets his dream move.

The club gets a fee - less than selling outright now probably, but once the 20% kick back to Chelsea is factored in, plus the cost and wages of replacing him now when we are over a barrell, we are not losing anything like the headline figures of £35m.

Liverpool secure the signing at a bargain price. There is one less player to amalgamate into an already disjointed squad given how many new arrivals there have been.

Is that CPFC tinted glasses thinking or is there some substance to that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top