Manchester synagogue attack

Spiderman said:
Did you read the article? A couple of snippets attached which suggests he supports HAMAS. Perhaps because it’s the Mail you can’t bring yourself to read/believe it
Click to expand...
I don’t comment unless I read. Particularly if the source is the Mail, whose headlines and concentration on aspects that suit their politics is legendary.

This guy has distanced himself and his family from the events in Manchester. As a Syrian he apparently posted social media comments during the war in Syria. It seems he opposed Assad. So did Hamas. He also seems to think that the state of Israel won’t exist in 60 years and welcomes that. I don’t suppose he is alone in thinking like that in the Middle East.

Posting comments praising the fighters of Hamas could easily be because of their support in Syria, which seemingly is his primary interest. Not Gaza.

Does that mean he supports Hamas, and everything they do? You would need to ask him and not the Daily Mail. I certainly don’t know.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
I don’t comment unless I read. Particularly if the source is the Mail, whose headlines and concentration on aspects that suit their politics is legendary.

This guy has distanced himself and his family from the events in Manchester. As a Syrian he apparently posted social media comments during the war in Syria. It seems he opposed Assad. So did Hamas. He also seems to think that the state of Israel won’t exist in 60 years and welcomes that. I don’t suppose he is alone in thinking like that in the Middle East.

Posting comments praising the fighters of Hamas could easily be because of their support in Syria, which seemingly is his primary interest. Not Gaza.

Does that mean he supports Hamas, and everything they do? You would need to ask him and not the Daily Mail. I certainly don’t know.
Click to expand...
Here's a clue.

nypost.com

Father of Manchester synagogue terrorist Jihad al-Shamie praised Hamas for Oct. 7 slaughter

“Men like these prove they are God’s men on earth,” Jihad’s dad wrote on Oct. 7.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It’s not. That was in the Mail article.
Click to expand...
Even though there are direct quotes we shouldn't believe they mean what they say. With logic like the it's incredible that anything can be proven in any case.
Today is the 89th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street. Not much has changed.
 
Teddy Eagle said:
Even though there are direct quotes we shouldn't believe they mean what they say. With logic like the it's incredible that anything can be proven in any case.
Today is the 89th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street. Not much has changed.
Click to expand...
As with so many things context is everything. Direct quotes, without context, can mean a variety of things.

That’s not just logical. It’s an obvious fact. Something that Judges are very aware of when assessing whether something is proven, or not.

I don’t know the context in which the statement was made, so I don’t know why it was said. Unlike the Mail and those prepared to take its judgement at face value.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
As with so many things context is everything. Direct quotes, without context, can mean a variety of things.

That’s not just logical. It’s an obvious fact. Something that Judges are very aware of when assessing whether something is proven, or not.

I don’t know the context in which the statement was made, so I don’t know why it was said. Unlike the Mail and those prepared to take its judgement at face value.
Click to expand...
And the context here is that Jewish people are fair game. Justify it to yourself if you can but anti-Semitism is the acceptable face of racism and is on full display here.
 
What goes around, comes around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top