Man City found guilty

Got to be better than a free for all though?
A free for all works in our lives. Although hmg don’t like it as some have more than others. Why shouldn’t football be a free for all. The jeopardy is with the investors. Yes there is collateral with employees but that happens now even with PSR and all the rules. If a club goes down the staff will be thinned. It’s the nature of the sport and all the money in it. The returns for investors cannot be more for all of them so eventually it reduces when they start losing dough. Natural selection will happen given time .
 
A free for all works in our lives. Although hmg don’t like it as some have more than others. Why shouldn’t football be a free for all. The jeopardy is with the investors. Yes there is collateral with employees but that happens now even with PSR and all the rules. If a club goes down the staff will be thinned. It’s the nature of the sport and all the money in it. The returns for investors cannot be more for all of them so eventually it reduces when they start losing dough. Natural selection will happen given time .
You must be far more trusting than me
 
Next weekend when the Prem starts again, everyone will look at the league table. And to everyone apart from City fans there will be 19 teams in it and Arsenal will be top. And then it really kicks off……
 
For some time now there seems to have been two layers of concern operating simultaneously.

The first is the fact that Sheikh Mansour / Abu Dhabi United Group own City. The second is the cheating scandal.

The government, premier league, media, and football supporters generally (particularly City fans) overlooked the first point far too readily. Even if you leave aside the stuff in the Sudan, or don't care about human rights, or think somehow the Sheikh has a different hat on when owning City to the one he wears as unchallengeable absolute ruler at home, you still have to ask why he's here. What's in it for him? What does he want?

Perhaps it's simply a matter of investing in an asset so that it grows in value. I'm sure City was worth a lot more up until last month than when they bought it. I'm sure Wrexham is worth more than when the film stars bought it. The American owners of Birmingham City are investigating hugely, and I doubt it's charitable.

Still, though, has the UAE really improved the value of the club by the same sum that they've sunk into it, even before the cheating is factored in? Is that even possible? As I understand it we are talking about a few billion when you consider the facilities and urban regeneration projects. Surely they can't get that back if they sell the club? Who could they even sell it to?

So, if not a pure financial investment then what do they want? Well, how about the kind of clout that sees the current prime minister, no less, instinctively go into bat for you when you get banged to rights for long term systemic cheating, complete abuse of power and wealth to frustrate the legal process, and show a despicable brass neck about it? Yeah, maybe that.

What seems to be happening is that the shameful and sustained overlooking of the UAE ownership of City, undertaken in the hope that the sportswash will work, that football can keep the masses willfully ignorant (it very much can) is now being brought back into the spotlight precisely because they've cheated at the sport, the only bit the masses care about.

The thing that should have been top of the agenda all along but which football tried to bury is now rising to the surface precisely because of football, and whether football likes it or not.
 
Last edited:
When I was watching the WSL today I did wonder if the cheat’s women’s team’s funding will be investigated. Surely they will have benefited from the wealth that the club’s owners were fraudulently pumping into the club.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top