• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Israel v Iran

God forbid! The Shah was a brutal autocrat in the mould of Assad who the West nobly propped up in return for a cheap flow of oil. Media presentation followed the standard Cold War model.

Assad - supported by Russia = evil.
Shah- supported by West = good.

But you are right about the square peg of forcing Western democracy on any country in that region. However there are models of countries that adopt a form of government more natural to local culture that work for them. Oman. Jordan. Hardly Scandinavia, but stable, quietly getting on with life and a long way down Amnesty International's hit list. Would not the West and most Iranians bite your hands off for that?
The Shah's regime was nowhere near as repressive and bad as the current extreme Islamist regime. It is a similar comparison with the Tsar's and Communism. The Left of course unerringly support the worse guys.
 
The Shah's regime was nowhere near as repressive and bad as the current extreme Islamist regime. It is a similar comparison with the Tsar's and Communism. The Left of course unerringly support the worse guys.
It was not " as bad " but that's a low bar. Plenty of political murders and repression of anyone anti Shah, but, there was a violent marxist insurgency as well and we know when you have that kind of situation people will do terrible things.

That's the way the country is, was and may well be going forward.
 
The only side Netanyahu is on is his own. Everything he does is purely to keep himself in power and out of court.
The enemy of our enemy, if you like.

He doesn't do anything for the West, but what he is doing suits the West right now.
 
They are breaking all that 'international law', security council and the other b0llocks all these clowns went on about for years to justify wars.

We heard little else during the neo con wars and now when it's inconvenient it's barely mentioned.

I don't support this because I'm not a neo con.....unfortunately Trump is.....after lying about it. I also think it's the wrong chosen path for Israel's best interests....but it's a garden path they have gone down.

All the hot heads seem to think that this is going to end well......I don't see it myself. But I certainly hope they are right and I'm wrong.

But I as I've said for many years on the forum.....I don't support starting wars that I'm not personally prepared to fight in......Personally, I think lots of old men just like seeing sh1t burn because it costs them nothing......Well it does but it's hidden costs not overtly plain to them.
I know you don't advocate military action, and in principle I agree.
In this case however, we might be preventing a nuclear exchange sometime in the near future.

On cannot know outcomes for certain, unless someone has supernatural insight, so decisions are based on intelligence, experience and probability.

Personally, I don't trust Iran an inch, and I'm certain that nuclear weapons capability is their goal. That cannot be allowed to happen.
This scenario was always going to happen in time.
 
He's not correct. They have been under a brutal regime of 1 leader. Doesn't mean it's what is wanted or normal or anything. Name a country where the majority population WANTS a hardline regime to arrive? They usually don't know what is coming, can't do anything about it or they've been lied to.

Before that overthrow Iran had a lot of liberty, a quick google and image search shows that clearly.
I'm sure they would like to cast off the fundamentalist cabal that rules them now, but I doubt they want to be ruled from Washington instead.

Letting your hair down again is one thing, but Americana won't be welcome anytime soon.
 
List acts of terrorism sponsored by Iran outside the Middle East.

So in that case why do you give a s*** about the people in Gaza if it doesn't matter because they are only in the middle east 🙄 Is it "because Jew"?


But since you mention it, actual attacks in these states
Argentina
Denmark
France
India
Panama
Bulgaria
Canada
Kenya
Thailand
Bosnia
Tanzania
Germany
Nigeria


Attempts or foiled plots in these states
Netherlands
Sweden
USA

They are also connected to Al Quaida, 8 of the 10 9/11 attackers had passed through Iran prior to entering the USA, and 2 Iranian intelligence defectors testified that Iranian intelligence knew of the forthcoming attack.

DEATH TO ISRAEL, DEATH TO USA, DEATH TO UK

Lol you don't have to get up early in the morning to refute any of the pro Palestine mob on here do you 😀
 
I'm sure they would like to cast off the fundamentalist cabal that rules them now, but I doubt they want to be ruled from Washington instead.

Letting your hair down again is one thing, but Americana won't be welcome anytime soon.


I never said they did, but I'm sure they don't want to be spending all their oil money on nukes, oppression and war.
 
Imagine being so wrapped up in hating the west that you say something like the above.



well you’ve swerved the point there haven’t you!
Who said the dictators were angels? The way they governed is in the title.
Are you seriously suggesting the aftermaths of Libya Iraq and Syria are more stable in economic and day the day life than before?? I don’t think so. A vacuum filled by warring militias and Islamic fundamentalists of differing views and the resulting debris have been landing on our beaches in the tens of thousands.
 
Got it. Unless the regime change is so seamless that it doesn't create a jot of upheaval then stick with the dictator.
 
2 terror attacks on Christian churches in Syria today.....but you know it's only Christians and nobody gives a monkeys about them.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top