'Research stuff'.
Well ok but these terms seem to be very elastic with people on here.
I still have trouble in defining why these terms are used.
We might say that a 'mixed economy' - a mix of central government and free enterprise is 'communist' or even 'neo communist' then, because in such an economy in the UK, we have, for instance, the NHS. Now, we know that this whole concept of the NHS is centralised and not private medicine. Is this arrangement, according to you, 'neo-communist', then? Are you anti the whole idea of the NHS?
Is 'neo communism' anything that means centralised government has a say in people's lives? In short, does it mean anything that is not privatised?
What are 'all the core principles' to which you refer? You see, I'm seeking clarification because, otherwise there's a danger that we start to bandy around terms which are flabby and non-specific.
I heard an American voter talking about the election and he said that he'll vote Trump because 'we don't want communists here'. Communists in the USA? Is he blind? Deaf? or what? The idea that any communist would thrive politically in the USA is absolutely absurd yet he's quite happy to roll it out.
It's the same on these boards. How many people on here who use that term actually have any idea what Marxist theory is about? Yet still 'communist' is thrown around liberally. Often used but seldom understood.
'Deluded morons' not helpful at all, Stirling.
The problem with fixed terms is exactly that... they can't change. But due to technological, economic (financial) and the managemental changes the nature of the political environment changes and thus political approaches and description have to change to fit that environment. So your charge of elasticity with terms is more a feature of political reality than a bug.
However, the terms I use aren't made up on the spot and have been a part of political discourse for a long time....obviously not in your political circles.
However, It's perfectly valid to ask questions if you feel the need to. A 'mixed economy' has never been communist as it requires central control as a core principle so obviously a mixed one is a deviation.
'Mixed economies are to an extent the natural nature of governance long before something like the NHS...for example, armies, police, taxes, the list goes on.....however as a planned and deliberate expanded policy it is at its nature socialist not communist.
I'm not anti the idea of the NHS in principle, but it's a luxury born of a successful society and only came about from politics that has little to do with modern attitudes, economic or cultural. Indeed, the distance from where we are now compared to its original vision is oceanic in measure. Its long term future is in doubt due to what it has become, not what it was.
No, 'neo communism' isn't just restricted to economics, far from it. In an earlier post I had posted a link to a video explaining the rise and success of modern day progressivism within the west and that informs you that what we are talking about encompasses all of society.....obviously that's far from just the government being a busy body in people's lives. If you want to have a fuller explanation of how modern day 'neo communism' came about and how we got to these terms I have a video I've posted before. I'll post it again here.
The chap in America you are referring to is talking not about economics but of the societal changes that progressivism has been promoting and mandating legally and via corporations..Not only is he being hit with legal requirements he doesn't agree with he's getting it promoted with media and entertainment and being taught to his children in schools......Affirmative action, DEI, ESG, trans and alphabet ideology, critical race theory...BLM.....He's correct when he refers to this as communism....though technically it's more Maoist in nature than soviet.
He's obviously not talking just about economics.
Sure, 'deluded morons' isn't helpful.....but I've been called a 'neo nazi' and just nazi plenty of times on Hol and I don't recall anyone on the left complaining about that insult being used. People like Owen Jones and Sakar, aren't morons in the sense of being stupid, far from it.....but as their ideology will and already has worsened society and if allowed to continue on, the lives of my children, I'm fine with calling them deluded morons.....They'd call me worse.