Immigration

So what are surrey police saying? No evidence that there was a rape? Or no evidence the rape was from Asylum seekers? Or both?

I see a lot of conflicting "no evidence" statements.

To link from the last I have seen from sky:


"To date, we have not found any evidence of the offence as reported but the investigation is ongoing,"

"No descriptions have been released as the information about the incident and potential suspects is so limited. To address the specific commentary, there is no evidence that asylum seekers or immigrants were involved"
 
ASCPFC said:
Another part of this is not believing the victim. Where have we heard this before? Is that how it works now?
Click to expand...
There was a great programme called utopia on channel 4 around 15 years ago. It goes into all these sorts of things with regards to cctv.

At the time it seemed fantasy. Now it's admitted fact.

I'm from the david icke school of let's question everything
 
eaglesdare said:
So what are surrey police saying? No evidence that there was a rape? Or no evidence the rape was from Asylum seekers? Or both?

I see a lot of conflicting "no evidence" statements.

To link from the last I have seen from sky:


"To date, we have not found any evidence of the offence as reported but the investigation is ongoing,"

"No descriptions have been released as the information about the incident and potential suspects is so limited. To address the specific commentary, there is no evidence that asylum seekers or immigrants were involved"
Click to expand...
I said from the start the police maybe caught between a rock and a hard place.

Speculation I know, but suppose from the get go the police don't believe the victim. So they don't believe any sexual activity happened consensual or otherwise. So there are no perpetrators to identify.

However if the police state that (let's say the following day) all the feminist anti rape activists will do their nut and claim they haven't done a proper investigation and the victim must be believed etc.

So it's Hobson Choice.

Of course I might be wrong but this is how it's playing out.

My guess is the police are hoping this will now quieten down and at some point in the next few weeks they will slip an announcement out that they could find no evidence and the case is closed.
 
eaglesdare said:
So what are surrey police saying? No evidence that there was a rape? Or no evidence the rape was from Asylum seekers? Or both?

I see a lot of conflicting "no evidence" statements.

To link from the last I have seen from sky:


"To date, we have not found any evidence of the offence as reported but the investigation is ongoing,"

"No descriptions have been released as the information about the incident and potential suspects is so limited. To address the specific commentary, there is no evidence that asylum seekers or immigrants were involved"
Click to expand...
There is only any conflict in the minds of those looking for it. Not having any evidence of a reported crime whilst continuing to investigate is unequivocal. Except to those who try to see a double meaning in “as reported”. Without suspects no descriptions could possibly be released.

It’s about time people calmed down and stopped making unfounded assumptions which will only weaken legitimate concerns. If there is anything to know we will know it when it becomes known to the police and appropriate for it to be shared.
 
Mattconrov said:
There was a great programme called utopia on channel 4 around 15 years ago. It goes into all these sorts of things with regards to cctv.

At the time it seemed fantasy. Now it's admitted fact.

I'm from the david icke school of let's question everything
Click to expand...
Nothing wrong in questioning things. The problem with Icke isn’t the questioning. It’s his answers.
 
Mattconrov said:
There was a great programme called utopia on channel 4 around 15 years ago. It goes into all these sorts of things with regards to cctv.

At the time it seemed fantasy. Now it's admitted fact.

I'm from the david icke school of let's question everything
Click to expand...
I now believe stuff , I wouldn’t have previously and disbelieve stuff , I would have believed previously .
The Country is a mess Truth wise .
Wokism and the left has destroyed intelligent debate and honesty .
 
Last edited:
Racehorse-80s said:
I now believe stuff , I wouldn’t have previously and disbelieve stuff , I would have believed previously .
The Country is a mess Truth wise .
Wokism and the left has destroyed intelligent debate and honesty .
Click to expand...
Or, as others might describe, you are a victim of today’s penchant for conspiracy theories!

The truth is usually quite simple to discern. Ducks being ducks.
 
Mattconrov said:
en.wikipedia.org

Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

I think when people dismiss conspiracies or believe them all; they are peas in a pod.

Bill Clinton actually apologied for the government infecting black men with syphilis.

The main nurse behind it, was in fact a black lady
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone believes anything about Epstein's death do they? Most obvious con ever: but life goes on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top