Immigration

Teddy Eagle said:
But they're patently not doing anything to help each other so why should they treat us differently if we were still EU members? How would we be leading the way? We didn't before.
Click to expand...
It’s now recognised that the problem needs to be tackled at source. Lots has happened in the years since Brexit. We are cooperating but it would be much better if we were an equal partner than if we must request an invite. We could drive the agenda.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Obviously more, but it’s hypothetical. We don’t. How many less if we all spoke Welsh rather than English?
Click to expand...
Why more? Are you saying that Germany and France are a second choice for the migrants who prefer not to make the channel crossing?
And as for Welsh, you do realise that we constantly employ outside contractors for translation purposes, despite English supposedly being a pull factor. I believe that HMG use 1700 translation companies; still, never mind.
 
Common Sense Club said:
Why more? Are you saying that Germany and France are a second choice for the migrants who prefer not to make the channel crossing?
And as for Welsh, you do realise that we constantly employ outside contractors for translation purposes, despite English supposedly being a pull factor. I believe that HMG use 1700 translation companies; still, never mind.
Click to expand...
Having read your posts i am in dire need of a translator to wade through your stodgy custard like posts.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
I have no doubt that everyone whose asylum claim is under process will receive plenty of information on how British society functions and what is expected of them. What ought to happen to them if they are convicted of any serious crime is a different matter. It ought to immediately mean their claim fails and deportation follows any time in prison.
Click to expand...


You must laugh to yourself as you type this kind of nonsense. Sad as f***.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It needs to stop if we are ever to get to grips with the real problem. Which is to isolate those who commit crimes and arrest and punish them until they either stop that behaviour or cannot because they are in jail.
Click to expand...


Yes, wait until they commit a crime first. Like at Bondi and the 48,000+ terror attacks since 2001.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
That’s untrue. Germany receives many more asylum claims than we do. France, Spain and Italy also have more.
Click to expand...
And when those claims are rejected? Where do they head? For many years, as I have stated before, Italy ( for example) gave illegal migrants a “ free” pass for 7 days to travel through Italy, so they did not have to entertain any asylum claim from them. Does this go against International Law, yes but only if they ‘heard” the asylum claim. I have interviewed many who have said this and, in fact, I have even seen the free pass.
Please don’t believe every country fully abide by International Law, in fact we abide more than most.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It’s now recognised that the problem needs to be tackled at source. Lots has happened in the years since Brexit. We are cooperating but it would be much better if we were an equal partner than if we must request an invite. We could drive the agenda.
Click to expand...
There are 27 countries in the EU but they need us to drive the agenda. That seems very likely indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top