Nice!Lol. Forget that nearly 40 is still young and no life experience these days.
At least if you lot are a generation older than me it won’t be long until the sweet release of death puts you out your misery.
Nice!Lol. Forget that nearly 40 is still young and no life experience these days.
At least if you lot are a generation older than me it won’t be long until the sweet release of death puts you out your misery.
This comment made me laugh. The only people in recent years that I have heard use that word were colleagues of Caribbean extraction when they were discussing people they did not like.What things from the first 40 years of your life can you no longer do now that you used to be able to do because of immigration?
Other than use the N word quite so liberally.
I have family members who will not come to London because they are scared. It's often the fear of crime rather than the reality of crime.The main reason I don’t come is because these days it’s a pretty awful experience in almost every way. Most of my extended family and many old friends have also left although there is occasionally a funeral to attend.
What has changed since 7/7 by the way?
All of them are doctors, nurses and engineers. If we don’t have and welcome all of them the NHS won’t run and neither will care homes.![]()
Migration fuels England and Wales population jump, figures suggest
The population rise of more than 700,000 is the second largest in more than 75 years, the ONS says.www.bbc.co.uk
A number of points.
1. How accurate this figure is anybody's guess. The ONS told us there were 3.5m EU citizens here in fact we know there were 5.5m. So it's largely guess work and the ONS seems to have gone to the Diane Abbot School for Counting.
2. They have absolutely no idea how many people are here illegally.
The chances are the real population figure is way higher.
Perhaps they just don't like you?!I have family members who will not come to London because they are scared. It's often the fear of crime rather than the reality of crime.
Undoubtedly true, still they don't have to see me. 😀Perhaps they just don't like you?!
61.8 million allegedly. Dyslexia probably the reason ; I’d guess nearer to 81.6 million. There must be ways of getting accurate figures, using multiple sources. I recall the last time Labour were in power and there was a phone in about immigration. The government spokesman in the studio gave a figure for Peterborough (I think). A call came in from a doctor there who informed that he had more than that number of immigrants on his books. A lag in the data collection was the stumbled answer. So, 81.6 million more likely.![]()
Migration fuels England and Wales population jump, figures suggest
The population rise of more than 700,000 is the second largest in more than 75 years, the ONS says.www.bbc.co.uk
A number of points.
1. How accurate this figure is anybody's guess. The ONS told us there were 3.5m EU citizens here in fact we know there were 5.5m. So it's largely guess work and the ONS seems to have gone to the Diane Abbot School for Counting.
2. They have absolutely no idea how many people are here illegally.
The chances are the real population figure is way higher.
It's an educated guess by the ONS. I think they look at the census, national insurance numbers issued and various other databases like births and deaths.61.8 million allegedly. Dyslexia probably the reason ; I’d guess nearer to 81.6 million. There must be ways of getting accurate figures, using multiple sources. I recall the last time Labour were in power and there was a phone in about immigration. The government spokesman in the studio gave a figure for Peterborough (I think). A call came in from a doctor there who informed that he had more than that number of immigrants on his books. A lag in the data collection was the stumbled answer. So, 81.6 million more likely.
If they supposedly live below the radar, there will still be a record of some form - doctors appointments, criminal records (no fixed abode etc). My point is that a more accurate total could be achieved if a wider range of info is used. The issue is that the government probably don’t want you to know if the figure is much higher. Hence the more acceptable 61.8 figure.It's an educated guess by the ONS. I think they look at the census, national insurance numbers issued and various other databases like births and deaths.
The problem is that there are many people British or not who chose to live below the radar so they will not necessarily be picked up on some of these databases.
It actually matters as government funding is based on population, so if you are underestimating then schools, NHS, social care etc. will be underfunded.
They’re boxing fans, obviously!People go on about Islamophobia in this country, yet the most popular boy's name last year was Muhammad! If we were all Islamophobes why would so many people give their sons a Muslim name?
Maybe that's why GB News is now the number one news station. It's one of the few places you can get the truth.Before this he said that the people on the boats are 95% women and children. They think they can keep on lying and nobody will know. Maybe because they know the BBC stick to the government narrative.
Apparently counting the amount of sewage we produce is one way of estimating the population. We all have to poop at some time.i vaguely recall this discussion for Leicester. The official population statistics have barely moved up at all. Yet the quantity of garbage produced each year has quintupled. Something about all the unofficial sheds being occupied by a dozen lads in every garden.
Does anybody have the link to the story ?
1970's Leicester being unrecognisable to today , if you were to compare two satellite photos.
It's because Muslims, like other immigrant factions, are going at it like rabbits while George and Mildred and the rest of our indigenous population have demonstrated some restraint to reduce the birth rate generally. Hence more names like Muhammad and fewer Davids.People go on about Islamophobia in this country, yet the most popular boy's name last year was Muhammad! If we were all Islamophobes why would so many people give their sons a Muslim name?
And there are different spellings of Mohammed, which all figure in most popular names.It's because Muslims, like other immigrant factions, are going at it like rabbits while George and Mildred and the rest of our indigenous population have demonstrated some restraint to reduce the birth rate generally. Hence more names like Muhammad and fewer Davids.
On the bright side, the name Kier has disappeared completely.