Spurs have a higher facility fees figure than Brenrford that has nothing to do with their league position. Just add the two merit columns together and you will arrive at the correct figure for how much you get for each position. I really can't explain it in any simpler way
Right, I see. I think.
Surely though, the facility fee is what it is? Spurs were always likely to get more than us, for instance, so presumably if palace are weighing up the financial benefits of chasing 12th over resting players to try and win in Europe and finishing 16th, they have to factor that in?
In any event, what strikes me remains how relatively little we make from either a higher premier league finish or from Europe compared to the cost of a squad built specifically to chase either.
Even if the benefits of finishing 10th instead of 17th are as great as £19m or so (contrary to the BBC report) that's still only one Canvot. Which is to say, a player you can afford with the money you make from a much higher league finish isn't likely to result in that type of difference on the pitch, and the cost of players likely to make that sort of difference is greater than the reward!
I remain convinced the same is true of Europe. A couple of different articles (including one from the uefa website) say the prize money totals circa £20m for winning either the conference league or the Europa league. As others have said on here, there are extra gate receipts and advertising etc, too. If palace make, say, £1m per game that's still only £7m max if they go all the way to the semis. Maybe we could round it up to £10m overall as I'm not sure exactly what a home game is worth to palace. Either way, that's about £30m max made even if we win the thing. Then, as others have also said, subtract player and staff bonuses, travel and accommodation costs from that. Again, even winning a European competition is worth about one average good player, and that's by our standards.
Our highest finish in the premier league is 10th. Most teams find they drop a few positions in the league if they go deep into Europe, either because of fatigue or from resting players to chase glory.
My original point was that I'd be happy to finish 17th and chase the cups. That's based on glory and excitement rather than finances. Depending on which source we use to do the sums, Europe is either worth a bit (£15m max) more than a higher league finish, or (as you say) there isn't even that much in it.
None of this suggests the club could ever realistically build a squad able to compete well on both fronts, as neither pays enough for that.