So your suggestion is - get rid of our most successful Manager ever, as opposed to a Chairman that has just presided over a shambles of a transfer window..!!
Look I get the Parish saved us thing, and we will be forever grateful, but no one can deny this transfer window has been appalling - no strategy and no plan..!!
Added to which I truly believe that SP’s financial position - meaning that he cannot contribute funds commensurate to his shareholding - unlike the other shareholders is causing an issue..!!
So on that basis we are operating on what SP can afford - rather than leveraging the combined wealth of the other 3 Billionaire owners..!!
Before anyone says it - and I’ve said it before - I get having wealthy owners doesn’t automatically equal funds to spend - but other teams seem able to dot it with imaginative accounting - look at Everton just built a new stadium costing £800M and spent £111M in the window..!!
So why can other clubs do it and we can’t - something just ain’t right..!!
COYP
If comes to an irreparable rift between Chairman and manager then yes.
Glasner's likely going in June no matter how much support he got or gets - like the young talented players we buy he's using us as stepping stone to bigger things.
This window hasn't ended up being a shambles as has already been pointed out by Robbo (and others elsewhere in threads.
As for other clubs, they're desperate and are willing to mortgage themselves to the hilt for success, Villa being the prime example. As for Everton, they've recently been taken over and the new owners have taken a punt on trying to get the club into a position where they can challenge for Europe. You don't spend the kind of money that they did when buying a club and not to do that.
Forest, as we know, have a corrupt owner. It will be interesting to see what happens when the new football overseer gets up and running and introduces stricter rules for ownership both in respect of new owners and existing ones. I don't see Mary Knickers surviving for too long in the new environment.
Parish falls into the same category as Levy - a chairman who cares deeply for the football club and wants to ensure they can both survive and compete at the highest level, but grounded in a solid financial base. Spurs fans have basically ousted Levy but will likely regret it down the line when the new people overextend themselves.
Let's face it when we came out of administration in 2010, I doubt any of us expected us to be where we are today. We've done it slowly and are getting stronger little by little. We can now realistically talk about challenging for a European spot.
Yes, Glasner has been a catalyst and I'm wanting him to stay beyond the season's end so as to continue the upward trajectory but he needs to recognize where we're at and our financial limitations.
If a fourth billionaire were to replace Parish, are the other three suddenly going to lend the club oodles of money? I doubt it very much.
Personally, I prefer to stick with the devil we know because in the main, parish has got more things right than wrong.
But it's all about opinions and clearly you and I have different ones