Grooming gangs

Assumptions based on previous events which turn out to be true. Just another example of your predilection for authoritarianism. Don't think anything other than what you're told and if it turns out that you were lied to then it was for your own good.
Any assumption, whether subsequently been found to be accurate or not, is always a mistake. That some turn out to be true doesn’t mitigate the harm done by any that aren’t.

When waiting for facts ensures accuracy what’s the benefit of assumption? Other than boosting the most worthless commodity on the planet. Ego!
 
'Grooming Gangs and Tapioca Pudding' ............ which has got more to do with the OP than the last 24 hours worth of dirge. Dirge from deliberate Trolls. Trolls intent on diverting every sensible conversation with tripe. The worst offender being the bloke just above this posting. He is closely followed by mr distraction himself, the Mayor of a feminist commune in Cornwall - never ever on target with the subject of the OP. Roger Irrelevant.

Its only certain subjects they don't want us talking about.

Grooming gangs & Tapioca Pudding.
If you are so grossly offended by the contributions of others, don’t read them. The solution to your pain is entirely in your own hands.

I rarely, if ever, read your posts. There are others, whose contributions have either been offensive or nonsensical in the past, I have on ignore.
 
I read that. Not though the remarks in whatever report you read. Mine says:-
  • In a move to ensure transparency, the judge lifted reporting restrictions to name the defendants, citing that "lack of information stokes public anger".
So the idea it was criticising the police comes from the reporter. Not the Judge. Another reporter reporting it differently. The Judge could just as easily thought the right time to release the names was after sentencing but until then it was necessary.
The judge literally criticised the police. This obviously doesn’t fit with whatever agenda you are on today
 
Any assumption, whether subsequently been found to be accurate or not, is always a mistake. That some turn out to be true doesn’t mitigate the harm done by any that aren’t.

When waiting for facts ensures accuracy what’s the benefit of assumption? Other than boosting the most worthless commodity on the planet. Ego!
Got it. No one should have an opinion on anything until they've been told what to think. Obviously doesn't apply to American politics where prejudgement is a prerequisite.
 
this seems to be a mature grown man chasing after a 16 year old child. Very professional , for a doctor.

Because some data are anonymised, its difficult to tell if its one sleazebag or two separate incidents....as discussed below.


 
this seems to be a mature grown man chasing after a 16 year old child. Very professional , for a doctor.

Because some data are anonymised, its difficult to tell if its one sleazebag or two separate incidents....as discussed below.


Sadly, we have no way of knowing if the threat is solely in Cork, or also closr to home.
 
Has anyone noticed that when talking about the Epstein or BBC abuse rings, absolutely no-one goes
"Remember there are non-celebrity abusers in the world too, it's not fair to just pick on celebs and politicians"
That's because sensible people recognise that certain rings evolve in a specific cultural context, and need to be addressed in that specific context. It's not racism, it's common sense.

There needs to be separate inquiries into
* Nonce rings at the BBC.
* British citizens links to Epstein
* Predominantly Pakistani grooming gangs

They all need to be smashed, each will require different approaches to do so. The last one needs to be the priority because of the sheer scale of the abuse and number of victims.
 
Has anyone noticed that when talking about the Epstein or BBC abuse rings, absolutely no-one goes
"Remember there are non-celebrity abusers in the world too, it's not fair to just pick on celebs and politicians"
That's because sensible people recognise that certain rings evolve in a specific cultural context, and need to be addressed in that specific context. It's not racism, it's common sense.

There needs to be separate inquiries into
* Nonce rings at the BBC.
* British citizens links to Epstein
* Predominantly Pakistani grooming gangs

They all need to be smashed, each will require different approaches to do so. The last one needs to be the priority because of the sheer scale of the abuse and number of victims.
If only!
 
Grooming, out on the streets, evening fieldwork. Sober Predators hanging around outside bars and nightclubs. Chasing after drunken women. Trying to round them up. And get these girls into the car.
Do you think this never happens also in your town ?

 
Last edited:
Again we see how Party/Government politics can detrimentally impact criminal cases. 🙁

It seems Government and Judiciary have become one.
 
In some ways, Lowe is a better ally as an independent than as a Reform MP. He can say exactly what's on his mind without the constraints of the party line.

Many agree with Lowe, but many more must vote Reform.

That's where I am at the moment.

But only because the left must lose power.....Reform, like the Tories did, seem to want to pull to soft social conservatism.

Farage has it in for Lowe, when Lowe has been the guy has been doing what the Reform base actually want.
 
That's where I am at the moment.

But only because the left must lose power.....Reform, like the Tories did, seem to want to pull to soft social conservatism.

Farage has it in for Lowe, when Lowe has been the guy has been doing what the Reform base actually want.

Unfortunately, the signs all point to Farage being a patsy of the establishment.
He called for Blair to have a bigger role during Covid, he praised the appointment of Mandelson as US ambassador. Now he is asking us to blame Epstein on Russia and ignore the mountain of proof that Epstein was a Mossad agent.

When it comes to the big decisions (the ones that actually matter rather than the ones that our gutter press actually talk about) - ID cards, 15-minute cities, Ukraine; Farage will toe the establishment, deep-state line. Every. Single. Time.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to the big decisions (the ones that actually matter rather than the ones that our gutter press actually talk about) - ID cards, 15-minute cities, Ukraine; Farage will toe the establishment, deep-state line. Every. Single. Time.
you can easily spot the difference between 'real opposition' and 'fake controlled opposition'......its down to how much vitriol they get from the Media and other politicians.

Trump, Tommy Robinson, Maria Steen (in ireland)., Marine Le Pen , Geert Wilders...........all real opposition.

Farage, Sinn Fein, etc..... Fake opposition
 
This Lady seems to be from that background.

Therefore
a) you cannot accuse her of Islamophobia and
b) she seems to really know what she's talking about...
.c) she is demonstrating great physical bravery & courage against a backdrop of a big threat of violence.

 
Last edited:
you can easily spot the difference between 'real opposition' and 'fake controlled opposition'......its down to how much vitriol they get from the Media and other politicians.

Trump, Tommy Robinson, Maria Steen (in ireland)., Marine Le Pen , Geert Wilders...........all real opposition.

Farage, Sinn Fein, etc..... Fake opposition

Most are 'controlled' to some extent.
It's very difficult for any mainstream politician/figure.
The first two on your list might have done some good work, but show strong signs of being controlled by Israel, possibly against their own will. Their obstructiveness and/or silence on Epstein speaks volumes,
I'd always want to avoid the trap of denigrating those who have at least done some good work, because doing anything takes great bravery and strength of character. But equally, I'd be wary of holding anyone up as some sort of hero/messiah figure who will save us all. Everyone has to do their bit.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top