Grooming gangs

Assumptions based on previous events which turn out to be true. Just another example of your predilection for authoritarianism. Don't think anything other than what you're told and if it turns out that you were lied to then it was for your own good.
Any assumption, whether subsequently been found to be accurate or not, is always a mistake. That some turn out to be true doesn’t mitigate the harm done by any that aren’t.

When waiting for facts ensures accuracy what’s the benefit of assumption? Other than boosting the most worthless commodity on the planet. Ego!
 
'Grooming Gangs and Tapioca Pudding' ............ which has got more to do with the OP than the last 24 hours worth of dirge. Dirge from deliberate Trolls. Trolls intent on diverting every sensible conversation with tripe. The worst offender being the bloke just above this posting. He is closely followed by mr distraction himself, the Mayor of a feminist commune in Cornwall - never ever on target with the subject of the OP. Roger Irrelevant.

Its only certain subjects they don't want us talking about.

Grooming gangs & Tapioca Pudding.
If you are so grossly offended by the contributions of others, don’t read them. The solution to your pain is entirely in your own hands.

I rarely, if ever, read your posts. There are others, whose contributions have either been offensive or nonsensical in the past, I have on ignore.
 
I read that. Not though the remarks in whatever report you read. Mine says:-
  • In a move to ensure transparency, the judge lifted reporting restrictions to name the defendants, citing that "lack of information stokes public anger".
So the idea it was criticising the police comes from the reporter. Not the Judge. Another reporter reporting it differently. The Judge could just as easily thought the right time to release the names was after sentencing but until then it was necessary.
The judge literally criticised the police. This obviously doesn’t fit with whatever agenda you are on today
 
Any assumption, whether subsequently been found to be accurate or not, is always a mistake. That some turn out to be true doesn’t mitigate the harm done by any that aren’t.

When waiting for facts ensures accuracy what’s the benefit of assumption? Other than boosting the most worthless commodity on the planet. Ego!
Got it. No one should have an opinion on anything until they've been told what to think. Obviously doesn't apply to American politics where prejudgement is a prerequisite.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top