Glasner Out

The usual, and sensible, approach is to involve the manager in both.
Why? If I was a manager I would not want any involvement in an outgoing transfer. My job would be whats best for my team. If he's going he is no longer relevant on a professional level.
 
Realistically, How soon do you expect a new manager to start getting the best out of our squad bearing in mind in all likelihood when he walks in the door he wont even know most of their names let alone their capabilities?
It will take time. Time we dont have. Our best chance of a turnaround is to hold our nerve and hope Glasner can turn the ship around once Munoz, Sarr, Riad and maybe a signing or two are available
Hence the suggestion of letting Paddy do it pro tem.
 
Hence the suggestion of letting Paddy do it pro tem.
I dont feel Paddy can do the job even on a temp basis. Thats my opinion. I think its too big for him. I could be wrong. If Glasner does end up hastily booted out we'll have to find out if thats true the hard way. Personally I wouldn't take the risk. Plus if it went very badly Paddy himself may never recover from it.
 
Why? If I was a manager I would not want any involvement in an outgoing transfer. My job would be whats best for my team. If he's going he is no longer relevant on a professional level.
The relevance is precisely because of what is best for the team. Obviously any first team player that leaves without a replacement is a decision that makes us weaker.

How can you do squad planning with only knowledge of incoming activity?
 
The relevance is precisely because of what is best for the team. Obviously any first team player that leaves without a replacement is a decision that makes us weaker.

How can you do squad planning with only knowledge of incoming activity?
Its obvious the manager has to be told at the earliest opportunity when a member of his squad is leaving. Thats the only involvement he needs to have.
As far as sourcing a replacement thats an incoming transfer. nothing to do with the player thats leaving
 
Its obvious the manager has to be told at the earliest opportunity when a member of his squad is leaving. Thats the only involvement he needs to have.
As far as sourcing a replacement thats an incoming transfer. nothing to do with the player thats leaving
And in light of all the speculation around Marc for months he should have been braced in the crash position ready for him to leave.
 
Now I think Textor has some responsibility. He had a different philosophy to other Board members, and he played a significant part in securing Glasner. I think after Textor went, some of the promises to Glasner went with him.
I'd like to think that communication was always there with the Board. Glasner has indicated they talk all the time.
Now I'm struggling to see how Palace got to this point. 😐😐🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺
 
Having had time to process the events of the last few days, I'm struggling to understand how Glasner can continue to have a working relationship with both Parish and the players.

We have of course only heard one side of the story to date.

But I question whether Parish really wants Glasner to stay or if he's just forcing his hand into resigning to avoid sacking him and paying him off.
 
Now I think Textor has some responsibility. He had a different philosophy to other Board members, and he played a significant part in securing Glasner. I think after Textor went, some of the promises to Glasner went with him.
I'd like to think that communication was always there with the Board. Glasner has indicated they talk all the time.
Now I'm struggling to see how Palace got to this point. 😐😐🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺
I find SJ a bit annoying, but I think he makes some very balanced and valid points. He also said he'd been on the phone to Textor who was sl@gging Parish off due to his lack of ambition!

 
Now I think Textor has some responsibility. He had a different philosophy to other Board members, and he played a significant part in securing Glasner. I think after Textor went, some of the promises to Glasner went with him.
I'd like to think that communication was always there with the Board. Glasner has indicated they talk all the time.
Now I'm struggling to see how Palace got to this point. 😐😐🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺
he could promise all he wanted it was still down to Dougie parish and the other 2 to agree🙁
 
I find SJ a bit annoying, but I think he makes some very balanced and valid points. He also said he'd been on the phone to Textor who was sl@gging Parish off due to his lack of ambition!

of course he was mmmmmmm jealous much
 
When you own the second largest Club in France you can get away with a hell of a lot like Liverpool, Man City or United. So Textor virtually bankrupted Lyon to build his football empire and got away with it fooling the French football authorities and UEFA. Parish knows it wouldn’t work with Palace. Textor showed OG the dream and SP has shown him reality.
 
Having had time to process the events of the last few days, I'm struggling to understand how Glasner can continue to have a working relationship with both Parish and the players.

We have of course only heard one side of the story to date.

But I question whether Parish really wants Glasner to stay or if he's just forcing his hand into resigning to avoid sacking him and paying him off.
It's a valid question.
By all accounts it was Matt Hobbs who had the discussions with Glasner yesterday which led to the story about Glasner continuing for the season.
It could be that Parish is reserving his position for the time being.
With Glasner announcing he is leaving this season it could lead to a drop off in performances.
Mind you, the players couldn't use this excuse for the debacle at Macclesfield as it was before the Glasner announcement.
Much will depend on the performances and results in the coming weeks.

If we continue as in recent weeks I see Glasner going, but my suspicion (and hope) is that we'll see an improvement as key players return.
 
It's a valid question.
By all accounts it was Matt Hobbs who had the discussions with Glasner yesterday which led to the story about Glasner continuing for the season.
It could be that Parish is reserving his position for the time being.
With Glasner announcing he is leaving this season it could lead to a drop off in performances.
Mind you, the players couldn't use this excuse for the debacle at Macclesfield as it was before the Glasner announcement.
Much will depend on the performances and results in the coming weeks.

If we continue as in recent weeks I see Glasner going, but my suspicion (and hope) is that we'll see an improvement as key players return.
This is exactly how I see it
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top