This might have been said already, but I can't bring myself to read all the pages of rants in this thread so apologies if it has, but haven't we spent more on players since Glasner arrived than what we got from selling them?
Perhaps I'm looking at this from too simplistic a cash flow basis, but we brought in £63.8 million from sales in the summer:
- Eze - £59.6 million
- Eduoard - £3.2 million
- Ebiowei - £1 million
and we brought in:
- Benetiz - £0
- Sosa - £3 million
- Canvot - £17.5 million
- Pino - £26 million
- Johnson - £35 million
which is £81.5 million, so we spent £21.9 million more that what we brought in from selling players.
So what exactly is Glasner expecting here? For a club of our size and taking into account FFP, I would say that we have invested? Granted the quality of those players aren't an exact match, but that's one first team player out and five players in that could start or be on the bench. We can't replace outgoing players like for like, we simply don't have the funds to do that. Also, this is our model, we bring in young players, build them up and sell them on, there's no way he couldn't have known that!
We're also investing in a new stand and having to borrow to do that, so not like player sales are financing that?