I think your observation on the Israeli lobby's self interest and motives is a fair criticism to make. I've made several criticisms myself of foreign lobbies, and of those lobbies the Israeli one is by far the most powerful. For example, I consider the building of a Holocaust museum outside parliament to be an insult as this crime had nothing to do with Britain and though I recognise this tragedy we never fought WW2 over his death camps. Hitler killed far more slavs than Jews.....are we going to build a museum for them? I highly doubt it.
Is it wrong for them to highlight the negative contribution Islam makes to Europe though? No, on that I think they only speak the truth......However for me, that does not translate into agreeing with levelling civilians in Gaza.
I like the fact that you highlight the reality that prominent Jews have also spoken out against what is happening in Israel as I think that's an important balance to have because as we can all be guilty of lumping everyone from a demographic into the same ideological camp.
However I will make the point that the idea that JD Vance or Nigel Farage are 'far right' (I don't know who Andrew Neal is...do you mean Andrew Neil?).....indeed, I had a little laugh at this. Anyone who actually knows what the 'far right' think of Vance (mixed race family) and Farage (Thatcherite and Islamic chairman) would know that they most definitely aren't under the same label.
They may be 'far right' to someone with your perspective but in reality they are civic nationalists and that's a significant difference from the 'far right'. It's like calling Blair a socialist because he's in the Labour party.
It's not wrong to highlight the negative contribution of any person or group as long as those observations are fair and based on fact rather than prejudice which it very strongly appears to be in this case. To that end I would highly recommend you consider the evidence put forward by Jones'. It serves us all far better to scrutinise the evidence rather than simply fall back on existing prejudices.
There are a very large number of exceptionally courageous Jews who fight with dedication and righteousness to stop the genocide and to contest Zionist atrocities. Norman Finkelstein is a very notable Jew whose family was slaughtered during the Holocaust and has dedicated his academic career to the conflict. There are many, many others, as the numerous reports of protests in Israel demonstrate.
I do mean Neil, sorry, that was a typo. It is reasonable to suggest there are differences in extremity between those characters, depending on what degree of resolution and which specific issue you wish to consider. It's the trouble with labels - left, right, centre... In this case, I consider the reactions to this event by so many figures who are undeniably from the right of politics and media as indicative of a far right mentality - a polarisation - whereby on the strength of only very limited information about the actual event and likely thoughts of previous similar events, they have taken the opportunity to bait their bases with innuendo; playing to the heightened prejudices and bigotries that that they have nurtured throughout their careers. The evidence for these assertions is laid out by Jones' in his citations of each of those figures and so I would strongly recommend you take an objective consideration of the arguments made as they do form a cogent and straight forward narrative. The other side of the argument so far consists of speculations and conspiracy theories about unverified claims of the suspect shouting 'Allahu Ahkbar' and being a double agent etc. All being unsubstantiated but all, conveniently, serving the positions of of those prominent political figures who run the risk of being exposed as racist bigots by this case.
Civic nationalists is a new term to me. As I said, on this issue, I see very similar reactions from a number of commentators from the right hand of the spectrum followed by quite a lot of frantic back-tracking. Those reactions are no different from those from the furthest right wing. If you want to try to split hairs, by all means you are welcome to contest each of those figures' reactions and explain how they are indicative of a spectrum of the existence of a wide spectrum of right wing opinion.
Being far right, is also not exclusive to a given creed. The Zionist movement is also far right and it has it's Arab contingent, for instance:
Meet the Arab Zionists: a new generation of online pioneers.
Nuances, and exceptions granted, but I hope that clarifies my position sufficiently.