Eze to spurs?

[Badger11]

"The Gunners will have been boosted by the revelation that a Chelsea move for Eze is now ‘unlikely’ according to journalist Simon Phillips, who claims the Blues were ‘surprised’ by the Palace star’s demands" By Fabrizio Romano, a true 100% journalist 😵.

I smell BS from Chelsea.

They don't want to pay the release clause so rather than tell their fans that they blame the player and his agent.

Or more likely Exe wanted assurances that he wouldn't be warming the bench.

 

[mileend]

I smell BS from Chelsea.

They don't want to pay the release clause so rather than tell their fans that they blame the player and his agent.

Or more likely Exe wanted assurances that he wouldn't be warming the bench.

Knowing Chelsea they'd buy him just so that no one else could then loan him back to Palace

 

[DANGERCLOSE]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1947620831770661067

 

[MrRobbo]

Perhaps like Guehi he wants assurances about where he'd be in the pecking order. He wants to cement his England place and Eze won't do that sitting on the Chelsea bench (or the Arsenal one for that matter)

Indeed. As much as I love him he'd likely start the season, but soon end up as an impact player.

Martinelli and Trossard are not as good at their best, but more consistant performers.

 

[est1905]

Taking two of the most inflated transfers of the last decade as the benchmark feels a bit loaded.

You can just as easily do it the other way:

'If Erling Haaland is worth £50m and Cole Palmer is worth £45m, Eze can't be worth more than £30m.'



'If Daniel Munoz is worth £8m and Ismaila Sarr is worth £
12m...'

The fact no one has met Eze's release clause yet suggests people don't think he's worth that price - £90m is complete fantasy land.

A great player, but anything over £60m... I'd be inclined to accept.

Utter rubbish. No one has ever negotiated downwards when selling a player. Especially one (Haaland) that was less than a year from becoming a free agent at the time. Sure, the buying club could try that nonsense but what idiot is going to say yeah sure we'll sell lower then!

 

[est1905]

Taking two of the most inflated transfers of the last decade as the benchmark feels a bit loaded.

You can just as easily do it the other way:

'If Erling Haaland is worth £50m and Cole Palmer is worth £45m, Eze can't be worth more than £30m.'

'If Daniel Munoz is worth £8m and Ismaila Sarr is worth £12m...'

The fact no one has met Eze's release clause yet suggests people don't think he's worth that price - £90m is complete fantasy land.

A great player, but anything over £60m... I'd be inclined to accept.

Good job its not you in charge then eh?

 

[est1905]

Kudus, Elanga & Mbeumo are better yardsticks for Eze's vaue.

£50/60 is in the right ball park.

For who? If thats not what Palace value him at thats not his value.