Epstein

Is that 5th or 6th go of bringing that up? I'd be embarrassed to have to keep shifting back to previous arguments to try and score points, as you seem to make a habit of doing - genuinely pathetic behaviour.

Obviously you've never got anything wrong in your 50,000 contributions.
did you log onto HOL to discuss the OP ? or to Troll the thread with insults & rubbish ?


Epstein
 
More smoke and mirrors obfuscation to avoid the actual point.

The point, for years, has been that the hidden/withheld Epstein files contain names of the guilty.
Whether those names are buried in the files or held in a literal list is irrelevant. Since, either way, going through the files would produce a 'list' of names. It's just wordplay. Frankly, it's an embarrassing defence to offer.

I'll say it again - this sort of obfuscation makes you complicit.
Previously you could hide in a mainstream safe-space reassured that millions of others, including the mainstream media and politicians, played the same weasly game. But no more. Now the world sees what people like you have been part of. A very small part individually, but nonetheless a significant collective part of what enabled this to be covered up for so long.
You too have blood on your hands - I don't believe it's any way melodramatic or unfair to say that.

No, it's a completely different point - the articles you shared as your proof are talking about the Maga/Right-wing 'Epstein list' conspiracy. That is very clear no matter how much bluster you want to throw around it.

I think your last paragraph is one of the most pathetically melodramatic things I've ever read - virtue-signalling on steroids.
 
Is that 5th or 6th go of bringing that up? I'd be embarrassed to have to keep shifting back to previous arguments to try and score points, as you seem to make a habit of doing - genuinely pathetic behaviour.

Well, you have never taken responsibility for wasting everybody's time with that absolute hogwash that....if you had any common sense you'd have seen the holes in.

It caved your credibility with me and I'm supposed to just forget it?

Take responsibility for that nonsense and I won't mention it again.

Obviously you've never got anything wrong in your 50,000 contributions.

If I get something obviously wrong I'll own up to it.

I remember admitting to being fooled by Boris Johnson on here.....being wrong about Iraq.....admitted on here. I have no doubt that like most people, I'm have wrong opinions about things I'm not fully informed on or just make the wrong calculation on. I do however try to support my opinions with something approaching logic.

However, what you did over Kirk was......well, let's just say you took the click bait and ran with it.
 
No I was just mocking your use of 'I've got the receipts' which is something you might expect a university student to say.

You move the goalposts so much it's v difficult for a conversation to actually go anywhere - you've successfully obfuscated the initial point sufficiently as to not feel like you were wrong, which seems to be an MO.

And then back to just random generalisations about the leftist boogeyman in your head.

Pointless.


🤣
Mocks other posters phraseology. Mocks other posters post count.
Then accuses others of obfuscating from the point.

This a parody account, surely?
 
Well, you have never taken responsibility for wasting everybody's time with that absolute hogwash that....if you had any common sense you'd have seen the holes in.

It caved your credibility with me and I'm supposed to just forget it?

Take responsibility for that nonsense and I won't mention it again.



If I get something obviously wrong I'll own up to it.

I remember admitting to being fooled by Boris Johnson on here.....being wrong about Iraq.....admitted on here. I have no doubt that like most people, I'm have wrong opinions about things I'm not fully informed on or just make the wrong calculation on. I do however try to support my opinions with something approaching logic.

However, what you did over Kirk was......well, let's just say you took the click bait and ran with it.

It's hard to put into words how deluded you have to be to think anyone is responsible for wasting your time on a website we all decide to frequent at our own leisure - I can't imagine the level of self-importance I'd have to feel to think that's a sensible or rational thing to say.
 
It's hard to put into words how deluded you have to be to think anyone is responsible for wasting your time on a website we all decide to frequent at our own leisure - I can't imagine the level of self-importance I'd have to feel to think that's a sensible or rational thing to say.

The only reason I took up the role of debunking that absolute nonsense you presented on here was because it dismayed me to see such easily dismissed nonsense being spread on here after that terrible public assassination. I merely pointed out the holes and the weakness of the claims.

Yes, it was a waste of my time, but I felt it necessary, even though I know someone like yourself is unlikely to take responsibility.....as you prove here.

You can imagine my levels of self importance if you like. Sure, I have an ego, however I'm fully aware that I am a man of no importance and will never claim otherwise.
 
Your pride and ego is more important than the blood of children. 🤣 🤣
We know that you are very selective about whose blood concerns you.

You remind me of a well known BBS contributor. Not as clever though.
 
Tin foil hat.

Maybe he was a paranoid schizophrenic and killed himself.
I was wondering how exactly the FBI and/or CIA would manage to kill everyone that posts sh1t about them online. They'd have to kill hundreds a day, thousands?

Maybe they do?

I'll just answer the door here. Some kind of American car outside with blacked out windows.
 
Yes. Yes that's exactly what I meant




......if you are a malicious turd, or thick.
Now you have upset the HOL's answer to Malcolm Muggeridge.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top