Paul Salvage
Member
- Location
- Bromley
- Country
England
The problem with passing stats is that they do not take into account the risk and reward factor! As a team the players are clearly trained to hit first time passes forward and almost hope that a Palace player will be able to get it first. If you watch the wingbacks they constantly hit blind passes into the middle of the park and then it becomes a 50/50. When it works it is an effective way of breaking the opposition lines, and when it doesn't we have the cover to try and win the ball back. With regard to Adam Wharton he is the most forward passing player I have ever seen, and again he gives the ball away a lot, but when it comes off he plays balls that forwards dream of.What a poor advertisement for the Premier League, painful and slap-dash .....
We were lucky to beat Burnley with such a lack-lustre, lower division performance.
Our defence was good, as usual but our midfield is painful. Continuous one-touch passing at pace is producing very little.
Wharton is our king-pin in midfield but he rarely holds the ball. He needs, and has the ability, to bring the ball forward before passing and should copy Guehi who is the only one confident to do it.
Can someone please tell me what Kamada's role is in our midfield? True, he occasionally produces a decent pass but more often either gives it away or throws his arms up in despair. Speaks wonders for our lack of squad depth when he gets the nod from Glasner. Tiredness now seems obvious and does not bode well for the rest of this month.
I fear Fulham will get the better of us on Sunday.
Yes it is frustrating that we give the ball away a lot, but the risk and reward is clearly by design otherwise Glasner would be bollocking players constantly.