Juventus = Notts County.
Returning to the stand... The whole issue of retaining some sense of the past when redeveloping it is pretty varied. When Sunderland moved from Roker Park to the stadium of light, they took the turnstiles with them to keep some sort of connection with their history. It's still just a generic early 2000s stadium, though, albeit bigger than Southampton, Derby, Leicester etc.
Arsenal kept the clock from the clock end when moving to the Emirates, and Spurs made a big deal about moving that cockerel thing. Ultimately though, neither stadium has any sense of club history. The Emirates looks like loads of other modern European stadiums and the spurs ground looks like loads of American ones.
Villa redeveloped the Holte End years ago, and their American owner endeared himself to fans by restoring the exceptional brick detailing and pub. Villa park has been rebuilt stand by stand but retains a real sense of place, as we say in the world of planning.
Craven Cottage has such character and historical interest that Fulham are constrained by it. I believe one of the stands is a listed building. Good luck fixing a jumbotron to the wall of that.
Even though it was designed by Archibald Leitch, the most famous stadium designer of his day, I doubt many people think the existing main stand at selhurst is worthy of preservation, or that it has any elements we should transplant into the new stand for nostalgic reasons. Even the nod to the original crystal palace building seems like a pastiche to me.
Surely though somewhere could be found for these bricks?! Will stand contain a palace museum? Stick them in there if so.