Islamophobia in The West

😎

Not gone well for you, this, has it?
You are trolling, plain and simple. If you can act like a grown up then you will go back on ignore.

I'm not doing word play with lefty half wits. I'm too old for that s***. You don't even understand the English language.
 
You are trolling, plain and simple. If you can act like a grown up then you will go back on ignore.

I'm not doing word play with lefty half wits. I'm too old for that s***. You don't even understand the English language.

Pointing out the glaringly obvious flaws and contradictions in your argument is not trolling.

Calling me a w*nker is though.
 
This fella is one of the most Islamophobic out there. He regularly burns Qurans in public - including outside Mosques that he drives to for his trouble. He gets attacked, and gets both a) protected by and b) arrested by the cops.

He has had his car overturned on the motorway and seems to have a baying mob of Antifa etc all attacking him in the street. He gets punched & kicked every day. Is he Phobic, Fearless, fool-hardy, or what ?

 
Last edited:
Pointing out the glaringly obvious flaws in your argument is not trolling.

Calling me a w*nker is though.
Wrong twice.

There are no flaws in my argument, but one more trolling post from you and it's ignore time.

I just can't be bothered to respond when you lost it a long time ago.
 
Same as it would if you committed the crime for the reason of someone being a Scot. Same hate crime legislation.
Same except it's enforced in some cases and not in others. In the year ending March 2025 there were 137,550 hate crimes recorded. How many of those were for Christianophobia?
 
Pointing out the glaringly obvious flaws and contradictions in your argument is not trolling.

Calling me a w*nker is though.
It's not libel if it's true, a jury would have to decide. Based on your track record Centurion I wouldn't fancy your chances. Like the object of your acolyte devotion you may end on here protesting that the judge was wrong and it's all unfair, if it ever happened of course.
 
Wrong twice.

There are no flaws in my argument, but one more trolling post from you and it's ignore time.

I just can't be bothered to respond when you lost it a long time ago.

‘The whole point of writing the word into law was to use it for prosecution.’

‘The whole point is that it is currently not written into law because of its obviously controversial nature.’

Consecutive posts. ‘No flaws’.
 
It's not libel if it's true, a jury would have to decide. Based on your track record Centurion I wouldn't fancy your chances. Like the object of your acolyte devotion you may end on here protesting that the judge was wrong and it's all unfair, if it ever happened of course.

God that 80 something year old really does live rent free in there doesn’t he.
 
‘The whole point of writing the word into law was to use it for prosecution.’

‘The whole point is that it is currently not written into law because of its obviously controversial nature.’

Consecutive posts. ‘No flaws’.
The first sentence suggests intention, not that it was actually written into law.

Clearly you don't grasp the complexities of the English language. Go away and work on that and maybe you might avoid posting idiotic drivel.
 
The first sentence suggests intention, not that it was actually written into law.

Clearly you don't grasp the complexities of the English language. Go away and work on that and maybe you might avoid posting idiotic drivel.

I sometimes wonder whether you ever read your own posts back to yourself before you post them.
 
I sometimes wonder whether you ever read your own posts back to yourself before you post them.
Well, I'm 100% correct and you are 100% wrong, so I'm happy with my performance.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top