But literally included as a hate crime which would result in a longer sentence if it was ever enforced.
Same as it would if you committed the crime for the reason of someone being a Scot. Same hate crime legislation.
But literally included as a hate crime which would result in a longer sentence if it was ever enforced.
England
You are trolling, plain and simple. If you can act like a grown up then you will go back on ignore.😎
Not gone well for you, this, has it?
You are trolling, plain and simple. If you can act like a grown up then you will go back on ignore.
I'm not doing word play with lefty half wits. I'm too old for that s***. You don't even understand the English language.
USA
England
Wrong twice.Pointing out the glaringly obvious flaws in your argument is not trolling.
Calling me a w*nker is though.
Scotland
Same except it's enforced in some cases and not in others. In the year ending March 2025 there were 137,550 hate crimes recorded. How many of those were for Christianophobia?Same as it would if you committed the crime for the reason of someone being a Scot. Same hate crime legislation.
It's not libel if it's true, a jury would have to decide. Based on your track record Centurion I wouldn't fancy your chances. Like the object of your acolyte devotion you may end on here protesting that the judge was wrong and it's all unfair, if it ever happened of course.Pointing out the glaringly obvious flaws and contradictions in your argument is not trolling.
Calling me a w*nker is though.
Ireland
I'll hazard a guess at none.Same except it's enforced in some cases and not in others. In the year ending March 2025 there were 137,550 hate crimes recorded. How many of those were for Christianophobia?
Wrong twice.
There are no flaws in my argument, but one more trolling post from you and it's ignore time.
I just can't be bothered to respond when you lost it a long time ago.
It's not libel if it's true, a jury would have to decide. Based on your track record Centurion I wouldn't fancy your chances. Like the object of your acolyte devotion you may end on here protesting that the judge was wrong and it's all unfair, if it ever happened of course.
Scotland
Nun?I'll hazard a guess at none.
England
The first sentence suggests intention, not that it was actually written into law.‘The whole point of writing the word into law was to use it for prosecution.’
‘The whole point is that it is currently not written into law because of its obviously controversial nature.’
Consecutive posts. ‘No flaws’.
Ha, now you've offended him by mentioning his age. Well done CenturionGod that 80 something year old really does live rent free in there doesn’t he.
The first sentence suggests intention, not that it was actually written into law.
Clearly you don't grasp the complexities of the English language. Go away and work on that and maybe you might avoid posting idiotic drivel.
Ha, now you've offended him by mentioning his age. Well done Centurion
As do your posts amuse many on here so you're in a good position to know CenturionI think yours and others obsession over him just amuses him, HK Patriot.
Ireland
For religiously motivated crimes against Christians, have the quickest search on how many churches have burned down in England, even Ireland, let alone France. Then consider why none of us ever really heard much about it. I think you'll find it pretty widespread.Nun?
England
Well, I'm 100% correct and you are 100% wrong, so I'm happy with my performance.I sometimes wonder whether you ever read your own posts back to yourself before you post them.
USA
yes well, its another Home-Run from Cricket's Dan Howzat !!!!Well, I'm 100% correct and you are 100% wrong, so I'm happy with my performance.