Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
It's better to burn out than to fade away.
England
England
That's not the point. It is a simple choice between Labour and Reform. What I'm happy with has nothing to do with it.Yeah but Hrolf you're happy with a parliament of Thatcherism.
That's all Reform is going to give us.
Why would anyone worrying about the future of their white kids vote for Reform over Restore.
Reform aren't going to do anything to change the demographic direction of travel.
So we get Labour.....very unlikely anyway.....What's the difference....the result ends up being the same.....just maybe five years earlier.
England
England
That's not the point. It is a simple choice between Labour and Reform. What I'm happy with has nothing to do with it.
I'm sure I would see eye to eye with Rupert Lowe on many subjects, but his party only increases the risk of another Labour government. Restore can only succeed by a Reform failure in the best case scenario.
The Reform party of electioneering could be very different in government in either direction. It is a journey we must take. Repatriating 'British' citizens and all that is a pipe dream right now. The first thing we must do is stop the rot.
England
England
He will be a disaster as a PM.Andy Burnham believes in
Rejoining the E.U.
For immigration
A wealth tax
Decentralisation
Social control of Housing
A strong N.H.S.
England
England
I think his popularity in Manchester is being over stated - I know people ( sorry, folk ) up there that think of him as Londoners think of KhanI just have a 'Feeling in my water' that if, as expected', Burnham's contests the seat he will emerge victorious because of his personal popularity in those parts , the fact that there will be a different dynamic in the minds of the electorate and that Makerfield is historically a safe Labour constituency.
Should I be proved wrong, I shall be delighted.
England
I thought he was viewed as "King of the North" and popular in those parts.I think his popularity in Manchester is being over stated - I know people ( sorry, folk ) up there that think of him as Londoners think of Khan
By Christmas you will look upon Sir Keir Starmer with real love and affection as Burnham rinses you.He will be a disaster as a PM.
As I've written before, much as I don't like Starmer, the alternatives are far worse.
If Burnham gets in that's good news for Nigel Farage.
By the way, a '' strong NHS '' ? What's that exactly ? It's not been fit for purpose for years. Governments from both sides can chuck all the money at it they like but it's too bloated to succeed.
He pursued the case of the Hillsborough victims with impressive vigour and has challenged the lackadaisical Manchester Police on their poor behaviour to child protection and strip searching.I thought he was viewed as "King of the North" and popular in those parts.
He has been elected Mayor of Greater Manchester three times.
Burnham is odds on to win Makerfield the Tories are 500 to 1 against another lost deposit!I just have a 'Feeling in my water' that if, as expected', Burnham's contests the seat he will emerge victorious because of his personal popularity in those parts , the fact that there will be a different dynamic in the minds of the electorate and that Makerfield is historically a safe Labour constituency.
Should I be proved wrong, I shall be delighted.
England
I wasn't at the press gathering you must know the press take the bit that they want.I read comments from Powell - Deputy Labour leader - this morning about needing Burnham to head off Reform.
If ever you wanted to know how self serving they are - it is right there - no concern for the country or the population - just staying in power to continue to wreck the place.
She also says - " we have made mistakes" - no S*** Sherlock!
I detest them more than any party ever
England
Seriously ?By Christmas you will look upon Sir Keir Starmer with real love and affection as Burnham rinses you.
Strong N.H.S. is a return to the glory days of Aneurin Bevan the founder of the N.H.S. and the principle of free at the point of use.
Best to just ridicule the bit you want and ignore the rest ,surely you were an unprincipled member of the press corp.Seriously ?
So you don't think times have changed much since 1948....a truly Labour perspective - out of touch with reality.
England
The Tories had practically identical proposals for a national health system. Bevan was nothing special - Ernie Bevin was though and they hated each other.By Christmas you will look upon Sir Keir Starmer with real love and affection as Burnham rinses you.
Strong N.H.S. is a return to the glory days of Aneurin Bevan the founder of the N.H.S. and the principle of free at the point of use.
Ireland