US Politics

Badger11 said:
It's a bit of a stretch to go from not liking a President's immigration policy to genocide.

ICE are not doing anything they didn't do under Obama and Clinton. The difference is that Trump is in people's faces about it and he has deliberately targeted so called Sanctuary cities run by the Democrats.

The local police are prevented often by law in assisting ICE so Trump swamps the area with federal employees which brings out the protestors and then we have controversial shootings.

If the local police were allowed to support ICE you could reduce the number of agents and hopefully do their job in a much less provocative way.

Personally I find it crazy that states are allowed to pass laws that stop police assisting federal authorities, that employers and landlords are not allowed to ask a person about their immigration status and generally run opposite to the laws as passed by the US congress.

Imagine Khan announcing that London was a sanctuary city and that the Met would no longer enquire about immigration status etc.
Click to expand...
I suspect in many cases, they dont
 
eaglesdare said:
www.gbnews.com

Donald Trump eyes £116m investment in Cornish tin mine as China trade war heats up

The US President is attempting to make the West less reliant on China when it comes to critical minerals
www.gbnews.com www.gbnews.com

Looks like Greenland and Canada will have to wait after all. Trump has his sights set on Cornwall 🤭🤭🤭

Looks like a good investment opportunity anyway....
Click to expand...
There was a solid reason for its closure and several attempts to reopen it. It’s a deep mine whereas the ones in China and SE Asia are open cast and cheaper to operate. Building a strategic resource for ourselves makes some sense but whilst we can it will still be cheaper to buy on the open market. Doing it for the USA whilst Trump, or his like, are in the WH, makes no sense at all.

I have met one of the last miners to work there. The conditions and the outdated methods sound horrendous. It would take a lot of investment to bring up to date.
 
Last edited:
Wisbech Eagle said:
That you wouldn’t be concerned, or wanting to protest, has no bearing on the legal right of others to do so.

You can think whatever you wish about her. That’s your right. Her’s was that she could protest.

Law enforcement officers have a duty not only to apply the law but also to respect the law. They didn’t. That truly is the long and short of it.
Click to expand...
Yup and I suppose her protest was respectful of the bounds of the law she was meant to live by ! Glass houses wissie glass houses !
 
Fascinating journalism on Syria by Callum (formerly of LotusEaters).

He travels to these dangerous places and reports far more truthfully on them than you'd ever get from today's mainstream.

I can recommend this video to anyone sensible and interested in the truth.

 
cryrst said:
Yup and I suppose her protest was respectful of the bounds of the law she was meant to live by ! Glass houses wissie glass houses !
Click to expand...
Everything I have read, and seen, about her activity on the day she was shot suggests it was lawful. Disruptive certainly. Potentially committing a minor traffic offence that the local police could have been requested to deal with but something that is outside the remit of ICE.

So no glass in sight.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Everything I have read, and seen, about her activity on the day she was shot suggests it was lawful. Disruptive certainly. Potentially committing a minor traffic offence that the local police could have been requested to deal with but something that is outside the remit of ICE.

So no glass in sight.
Click to expand...
The local police were told not to help ice and you agree with that. You answered your own question haven’t you really !
 
cryrst said:
The local police were told not to help ice and you agree with that. You answered your own question haven’t you really !
Click to expand...
Not with their trawling through neighbourhoods rounding up those who fit the racial profiles they are looking for or in support of aggressive tactics. Dealing with a traffic incident they would. It would though, of course, require ICE to also stop blocking the roads with their vehicles.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Not with their trawling through neighbourhoods rounding up those who fit the racial profiles they are looking for or in support of aggressive tactics. Dealing with a traffic incident they would. It would though, of course, require ICE to also stop blocking the roads with their vehicles.
Click to expand...
You’re in a different world. TDS is obstructing any sensible thought you have.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Not with their trawling through neighbourhoods rounding up those who fit the racial profiles they are looking for or in support of aggressive tactics. Dealing with a traffic incident they would. It would though, of course, require ICE to also stop blocking the roads with their vehicles.
Click to expand...
You are wasting your time with these people. They are weak minded, racist and devoid of any morale fibre. They are unable to look at and assess clear evidence objectively even when put to them in incontrovertible video format.
I suggest you register with the CPFC.org forum site for a sensible conversation.
 
A22 Eagle said:
You are wasting your time with these people. They are weak minded, racist and devoid of any morale fibre. They are unable to look at and assess clear evidence objectively even when put to them in incontrovertible video format.
I suggest you register with the CPFC.org forum site for a sensible conversation.
Click to expand...
If there’s one thing about wissie I don’t mind. He fights his fights. I even agree on a rare occasion but he doesn’t run away from debate! He toughs it out and doesn’t need others fighting his battles or agreeing with him to make him feel better. Anyway bye bye to your mates 🤦
 
cryrst said:
If there’s one thing about wissie I don’t mind. He fights his fights. I even agree on a rare occasion but he doesn’t run away from debate! He toughs it out and doesn’t need others fighting his battles or agreeing with him to make him feel better. Anyway bye bye to your mates 🤦
Click to expand...
That I can and do is though not a barrier to anyone who sees through covert racism to point it out. It has nothing to do with making me feel anything. It has everything to do with the truth.
 
cryrst said:
You’re in a different world. TDS is obstructing any sensible thought you have.
Click to expand...
Not at all. Anyone not seeing what is totally obvious from the videos and supporting the Trump administration’s nonsensical defence of the actions of out of control bullies in uniform are the ones who are seriously deluded. I am in the real world. One in which you believe the evidence of your own eyes.

Federal employees are not above the law. Including State law. Citizens do not have to answer questions, follow orders or cooperate in any way unless they are arrested and they cannot be arrested without probable course. They can choose to cooperate if they feel it’s to their benefit but don’t have to. Just sweeping up people and checking later is illegal.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
That I can and do is though not a barrier to anyone who sees through covert racism to point it out. It has nothing to do with making me feel anything. It has everything to do with the truth.
Click to expand...

You have never cared about the truth, you were supporting 'ends justify the means' years ago on here. You only support whatever you think wins for your narratives: ethical or not ethical.

As for 'covert racism'. 🤣 🤣 🤣

You're the biggest anti white racist on here.

Spent a week denying whites even exist.

You can't get more racist than denying a race exists.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Not at all. Anyone not seeing what is totally obvious from the videos and supporting the Trump administration’s nonsensical defence of the actions of out of control bullies in uniform are the ones who are seriously deluded. I am in the real world. One in which you believe the evidence of your own eyes.

Federal employees are not above the law. Including State law. Citizens do not have to answer questions, follow orders or cooperate in any way unless they are arrested and they cannot be arrested without probable course. They can choose to cooperate if they feel it’s to their benefit but don’t have to. Just sweeping up people and checking later is illegal.
Click to expand...
The videos are all open to interpretation, yet each side of the debate so entrenched they just make their own interpretation. I can't fully tell what happened in those videos and nor can anyone else. It's got to the stage where I wouldn't believe eye witnesses either. Everyone just wants their bias and prejudice to be reinforced as though it's some kind of victory or vindication for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top