Glasner Out

That's for surfacing the quotes, certainly feels familiar!

You do wonder what players like Uche think hearing that there is nothing on the bench.
The guys on the bench will certainly have been feeling “ why am I here I don’t want to be here anymore “

Will anyone of them say “ Thanks Boss we heard what you said over last 6 weeks to press , we saw your polar opposite interview with BBC which frankly is now bollocks talk”

“ Boss you know what go to your new challenge F off cos you are saying we are not worthy of you , that trying to get 10 wins in a row is not a challenge, to win Conf is not a challenge, so what is then ,explain it to us “ ?

I think OG is damaged goods as he didn’t read the Parish MO from previous coaches or Parish promised but didn’t deliver.I think Parish is slightly perturbed because he didn’t read OG MO from previous.

Find the relationship's in the Club are now on a few strands left - see what happens this week & sundays game atmosphere
 
Of course that's possible but players get injured in the warm up too. Managers are paid to work around these problems or at least have some sort contingency plans in place.

Of course, and lets be honest, he has Canvot and Lerma. Both have played a decent amount in this system.

He moaned about Eze too, but from memory Eze called Glasner and told him he wasn't playing that evening.
 
We can debate whether Parish is at fault for lack of signings and selling players or Glasner is at fault for not giving certain players a chance but we can all agree that Glasner’s behaviour the other day was not normal. There’s definitely a pattern to his behaviour when he is upset after losing a match. His rant’s demonstrate a loss of control over his emotions.
As someone who worked in brain rehabilitation and regularly dealt with patients who had suffered significant brain injuries it’s a behaviour I’ve seen many times before. Perhaps I’m wide of the mark and he’s just an arrogant pr*ck like Lanzo says, but I do find myself wondering if his extreme behaviour is a consequence of the serious brain injury he sustained which ended his playing career. It’s been a recurring theme throughout his managerial career. It’s fairly typical of patients who have sustained head injuries. We all are capable of extreme or inappropriate behaviour when upset but our frontal lobes kick in and prevent us from saying and doing things we might later regret. Brain injuries of the sort he sustained impact the frontal lobes more than anything and impair our ability to apply the brakes. The impact can be lifelong and significantly harm relationships at home and at work.
If my suspicion is correct then Glasner will be aware that he has this tendency and may even have discussed it with Parish who is a decent guy and will cut him some slack as he seems to have done. He’s lucky to have an understanding boss. Sadly that won’t always happen.
 
I think the Palace players are deliberately not scoring during games, (and if they do score, we end up losing) in order to accelerate a managerial solution.
Just a theory, but the facts give it credibility 👍
Just as much credibility, as all the other 65 pages of speculation 😁
 
We can debate whether Parish is at fault for lack of signings and selling players or Glasner is at fault for not giving certain players a chance but we can all agree that Glasner’s behaviour the other day was not normal. There’s definitely a pattern to his behaviour when he is upset after losing a match. His rant’s demonstrate a loss of control over his emotions.
As someone who worked in brain rehabilitation and regularly dealt with patients who had suffered significant brain injuries it’s a behaviour I’ve seen many times before. Perhaps I’m wide of the mark and he’s just an arrogant pr*ck like Lanzo says, but I do find myself wondering if his extreme behaviour is a consequence of the serious brain injury he sustained which ended his playing career. It’s been a recurring theme throughout his managerial career. It’s fairly typical of patients who have sustained head injuries. We all are capable of extreme or inappropriate behaviour when upset but our frontal lobes kick in and prevent us from saying and doing things we might later regret. Brain injuries of the sort he sustained impact the frontal lobes more than anything and impair our ability to apply the brakes. The impact can be lifelong and significantly harm relationships at home and at work.
If my suspicion is correct then Glasner will be aware that he has this tendency and may even have discussed it with Parish who is a decent guy and will cut him some slack as he seems to have done. He’s lucky to have an understanding boss. Sadly that won’t always happen.
Interesting point. I have a friend who had a massive brain injury and he's never been the same. Can be incredibly angry sometimes. Would never have thought about it with Glasner. Does put a different angle on it.
 
We can debate whether Parish is at fault for lack of signings and selling players or Glasner is at fault for not giving certain players a chance but we can all agree that Glasner’s behaviour the other day was not normal. There’s definitely a pattern to his behaviour when he is upset after losing a match. His rant’s demonstrate a loss of control over his emotions.
As someone who worked in brain rehabilitation and regularly dealt with patients who had suffered significant brain injuries it’s a behaviour I’ve seen many times before. Perhaps I’m wide of the mark and he’s just an arrogant pr*ck like Lanzo says, but I do find myself wondering if his extreme behaviour is a consequence of the serious brain injury he sustained which ended his playing career. It’s been a recurring theme throughout his managerial career. It’s fairly typical of patients who have sustained head injuries. We all are capable of extreme or inappropriate behaviour when upset but our frontal lobes kick in and prevent us from saying and doing things we might later regret. Brain injuries of the sort he sustained impact the frontal lobes more than anything and impair our ability to apply the brakes. The impact can be lifelong and significantly harm relationships at home and at work.
If my suspicion is correct then Glasner will be aware that he has this tendency and may even have discussed it with Parish who is a decent guy and will cut him some slack as he seems to have done. He’s lucky to have an understanding boss. Sadly that won’t always happen.
That's an interesting take on it and does seem possible.
 
Not sure I'm bringing anything new to this debate, but I would just like to express my frustration/anger/astonishment surrounding this soar opera.

For me, OG has lost the plot. He seemingly has no concept of working with a club like ours, only with and for himself. No idea that from time to time we have to sell players, and sometimes they're gonna be from the 1st team. We've sold Eze and Guehi(almost) - 2 players that everyone knew were going to leave, we've bought in replacements in Pino, Johnson & Canvot, and as well have promising young talents like Drakes-Thomas, and a few others that don't even get considered even when on the bench.

His handling of the subs this weekend was appauling. 2nd half we were poor, yet still stuck resolutely, and looked at the bench and saw no solutions. That's not a manager. Even the worst managers roll the dice occasionally.

He is prioritising his situation above the the clubs, and placing making his point above the needs of the team; rather than try everything he can to win a game, he'd rather sit on his stubborn a*se and make his point. And I cannot see it changing.

Thanks for last year OG, it was truly amazing but your behaviour this past month has not even been close to what is required of a football manager at our club. Sort it out or get out, and allow us to get someone in who actually want to work with us.
 
We can debate whether Parish is at fault for lack of signings and selling players or Glasner is at fault for not giving certain players a chance but we can all agree that Glasner’s behaviour the other day was not normal. There’s definitely a pattern to his behaviour when he is upset after losing a match. His rant’s demonstrate a loss of control over his emotions.
As someone who worked in brain rehabilitation and regularly dealt with patients who had suffered significant brain injuries it’s a behaviour I’ve seen many times before. Perhaps I’m wide of the mark and he’s just an arrogant pr*ck like Lanzo says, but I do find myself wondering if his extreme behaviour is a consequence of the serious brain injury he sustained which ended his playing career. It’s been a recurring theme throughout his managerial career. It’s fairly typical of patients who have sustained head injuries. We all are capable of extreme or inappropriate behaviour when upset but our frontal lobes kick in and prevent us from saying and doing things we might later regret. Brain injuries of the sort he sustained impact the frontal lobes more than anything and impair our ability to apply the brakes. The impact can be lifelong and significantly harm relationships at home and at work.
If my suspicion is correct then Glasner will be aware that he has this tendency and may even have discussed it with Parish who is a decent guy and will cut him some slack as he seems to have done. He’s lucky to have an understanding boss. Sadly that won’t always happen.
Yes, I'd thought it could be a factor myself. Not a symptom you'd want to discuss publicly for obvious reasons.
He does seem to appear a little bipolar.
 
The unstoppable force meets the immoveable object

Alien v Predator

I just think it's a conflict with Glasner wanting things his way, and the Boards' stoic business plan.
They're both right in wanting the best for the club, just differing ways /objectives.

The Board have a plan that keeps the club afloat and generates some income. Staying in the Premiership is the underpinning priority. Along with other financial considerations.
Glasner wants to go for Glory.
Both stances are applaudable, and lead to friction in a lot of clubs where the manager is ambitious.

I need to get out more. This thread destroyed my weekend, and I have stuff to do,
 
Last edited:
Sky sports has been fun they slated Glasner this morning not one good word , and called him a spoilt prat 🤣 also said Parish is playing a very smart game
 
May come as a surprise to some on here, but Simon Jordan has come out more in favour of Parish than Glasner (mind you, he acknowledges it pains him to do so)!
He thinks there's the possibility of it putting off some owners at big clubs who are under much greater scrutiny than Palace.
Jordan still couldn't resist one little gibe at Parish, revealing that Textor had been in touch with him over the weekend criticising Parish for 'lack of ambition.'
 
Sky sports has been fun they slated Glasner this morning not one good word , and called him a spoilt prat 🤣 also said Parish is playing a very smart game

I think they paint the narrative they want to - irate fans losing their sh1t makes for much better content, views, clicks etc. Refreshingly on TalkSport they haven't just given airtime to the over emotional fans calling for his head. Rathermore there have been some balanced views from both sides, much like on here.
 
May come as a surprise to some on here, but Simon Jordan has come out more in favour of Parish than Glasner (mind you, he acknowledges it pains him to do so)!
He thinks there's the possibility of it putting off some owners at big clubs who are under much greater scrutiny than Palace.
Jordan still couldn't resist one little gibe at Parish, revealing that Textor had been in touch with him over the weekend criticising Parish for 'lack of ambition.'
No surprise both members of the club owners trade union and Glasner is a jumped up manager in a long line of jumped up managers.
 
Of course that's possible but players get injured in the warm up too. Managers are paid to work around these problems or at least have some sort contingency plans in place.
Yes, if Guehi was going he isn't going to risk an injury by playing him.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top