Just a bit of banter, with my muckerWhat bit do you disagree with?
Just a bit of banter, with my muckerWhat bit do you disagree with?
I think the problem is that OGs not willing to commit, makes Parish nervous of making big signings, we have 3 loan spaces left, all should be filled in Jan, it may cost a lot, but won’t leave a large debt if OG walksI’m under the impression that OG will stay if he feels the club is moving forward. His publicly acknowledged disappointment with our summer recruitment has never boded well for me.
I therefore think that only a major spree this January would resolve this, and I don’t consider that to be likely although I have no insight whatsoever there.
We’re down to 8th in the table as things stand and seem to be falling toward a more likely end placement (having been in the top five briefly).
We won’t get relegated but I’m not hopeful of us finishing in a position that allows us to qualify for the Europa League at least or winning the ECL/FA Cup again.
So barring us miraculously winning the ECL (or FA Cup again), going undefeated for a long period like previously and/or making numerous quality signings in this window, I can’t see Glasner staying.
My prediction is for us to finish slightly above our traditional 12th, having made a couple of signings in January, with OG leaving once the season is done.
Roll on the next chapter after a quite glorious one which may have had the potential for more, but did deliver the one thing most of us had only previously dreamed about and some of us were lucky enough to be at Wembley to witness.
COYP
England
It is the model of plausibility that it will not be necessary for the club to present Glasner with a new contract to sign.Because the end of his contract is coming up and he thinks he can do better its really simple , you cant make him sign a new contract if he doesn't want to . Yes its a paper thin squad everyone knows that , but if he's made his mind up and its only conjecture at this stage he will be going , who knows maybe he's been tapped up . I'm sure he done his homework before joining Palace and knew dam well from Steve's previous history with managrs he wasnt going to break the bank just to keep him happy .
England
I was interrogated on this subject on Christmas Day !
Scotland
It's a fine example of the mess football in general has got itself into where a club is nervous about signing players to keep a successful manager happy when he might walk anyway and the players they already have can run their contracts down then leave for nothing and pick up a huge signing on fee. Big/rich/spendthrift clubs can get round it a bit by having too large squads available but we can't do that either.I think the problem is that OGs not willing to commit, makes Parish nervous of making big signings, we have 3 loan spaces left, all should be filled in Jan, it may cost a lot, but won’t leave a large debt if OG walks
Could you please explain your obiter dictumIt is the model of plausibility that it will not be necessary for the club to present Glasner with a new contract to sign.
I was interrogated on this subject on Christmas Day !
England
Just inquisitive souls on Christmas Day on the matter that is in the minds of our supporters and of interest to the media.Relevance?
England
By the way it is a wonderful Latin term !Could you please explain your obiter dictum
England
The point is that the board could offer the biggest wage in the league, promise him loads of new players in January, build a new stand and anything else. But they can not make OG sign a new contract. He now has all the aces and no one knows what OG has in his mind at this point. So to demand an answer to why we let OG go is ridiculous. The board (as far as we are aware) do not want to let him go, we just don’t control the situation!So it's just about his financial package? If so, you don't think the club should break the bank to keep him?
You don't think there are other factors?
England
England
It is Glasner's decision apropos a continuation of the 'Project' or whether it is in his interests to seek another challenge.The point is that the board could offer the biggest wage in the league, promise him loads of new players in January, build a new stand and anything else. But they can not make OG sign a new contract. He now has all the aces and no one knows what OG has in his mind at this point. So to demand an answer to why we let OG go is ridiculous. The board (as far as we are aware) do not want to let him go, we just don’t control the situation!
England
I would agree that I do not think OG is solely motivated by money. So for people to think that we could keep him by offering more money is folly!It is Glasner's decision apropos a continuation of the 'Project' or whether it is in his interests to seek another challenge.
I am not under the impression that personal financial considerations are pivotal in this respect.
Always good when a loved wife takes a real interest in Palace.It is the model of plausibility that it will not be necessary for the club to present Glasner with a new contract to sign.
I was interrogated on this subject on Christmas Day !
Scotland
Follyfoot Ball.I would agree that I do not think OG is solely motivated by money. So for people to think that we could keep him by offering more money is folly!
England
My dear wife does take an interest in our club but on Christmas Day she was not involved in the interrogation out of the 'Ipcress Files'.Always good when a loved wife takes a real interest in Palace.
England
The fact that he has said he will wait until mid-Jan and has made all the comments he has made about transfers, tells the story.The point is that the board could offer the biggest wage in the league, promise him loads of new players in January, build a new stand and anything else. But they can not make OG sign a new contract. He now has all the aces and no one knows what OG has in his mind at this point. So to demand an answer to why we let OG go is ridiculous. The board (as far as we are aware) do not want to let him go, we just don’t control the situation!
Although the billion dollar question is - what is enough to achieve the desired outcome ? (Assuming that anyone we buy / loan has already been pre-approved by OG in terms of quality & attributes)The fact that he has said he will wait until mid-Jan and has made all the comments he has made about transfers, tells the story.
He will 100% base his decision on what we do in the first half of the window. It’s so obvious that that is what he is waiting for, and quite frankly it’s fair enough.
We need to show our commitment to him early on in Jan, by strengthening the squad in numbers and quality, and only then would he return the favour by very literally committing to us with a new contract.
England