Woke is alive and well

Finally, an explanation... although you're obviously conflating different arguments. Nobody is saying that if you find a sportswoman attractive, you therefore don't respect her talent. Obviously you can fancy someone and respect them.

The point is about what is being emphasised about the athlete - there is obviously an enormous difference between an individual viewer finding an athlete attractive and a broadcaster/advertising company/sponsor deliberately using a woman's sexual appeal as the primary mechanism for attracting attention. That is the dynamic I was describing in sportswomen wanted to be respected, not fancied.

You don't need to know what every individual viewer thinks to criticise that dynamic. If an advert for a female football team consisted entirely of snaps in the shower, you could very reasonably argue it was reducing the players to their sex appeal... saying 'but how do you know people don't also respect their football!?' would in no way deal with that criticism.

Common sense, aye.

Its a feminist angle from one of the progressive simps.

It's why we have to put attractive women out of a modelling job in favour of fat pigs and mingers,. They're just deep down furious that someone else far more attractive is getting attention. Jesus Christ don't you remember the Pepsi and with the sweaty shirtless builder? What's wrong with using an attractive person to advertise?

Wanky jealous bitches and their simpy soy boy manfems
 
Again, 'sportswomen want to be respected, not fancied' does not mean 'if you fancy a sportswoman you don't respect her” - so no, the implication your suggesting is nonsense.

Paige Spirinac is a great example of me calling bullshit on you.
 
reproductive rights.
you are a father Dan. How would you feel if your girlfriend had aborted them ? without even bothering to tell you ?

conversely, how would you feel about getting pregnancy-trapped ? trapped by a girl that you did not want to have kids with ? and so you get roped in to all that responsibility.

or conversely again, she can have your kid without even telling you. Many kids have never even met their dad.

women have far more reproductive rights than men. They don't even need a man anymore (see link below). The one tiny sliver of power that men have is about the provision (or not) of money & childcare burden-sharing. And yet even that is being undermined by the wokes. Daddy Government replaces men with their own revenues deducted from the pay packet.

the wokes are producing a society of fatherless kids - or often even no kids at all. Often with invisible & calamitous outcomes. Labour-force winners are not reproducing while the Longterm unemployed reproduce a lot. If woke were a race-horse stable, it would have gone bankrupt for producing too many slow horses.

 
Last edited:
Wild that you think this when it gives your tiny little nubbin a hard on but not when it comes to reproductive rights.

You only need to read the Liberal Women and What Women Really Want threads to know what you lot really think about women.

Do I think this? I asked the question and also linked a news article about it.
 
you are a father Dan. How would you feel if your girlfriend had aborted them ? without even bothering to tell you ?

conversely, how would you feel about getting pregnancy-trapped ? trapped by a girl that you did not want to have kids with ?

women have far more reproductive rights than men. They don't even need a man anymore. The one tiny sliver of power that men have is about the provision (or not) of money & childcare burden-sharing. And yet even that is being undermined by the wokes. Daddy Government replaces men with their own revenues deducted from the pay packet.


He's probably a Lindsey Clancy supporter too? 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
Wild that you think this when it gives your tiny little nubbin a hard on but not when it comes to reproductive rights.

You only need to read the Liberal Women and What Women Really Want threads to know what you lot really think about women.

What's funny is that you think that women want simps. The "Viking baby" sperm bank story tells you otherwise.
 
Wild that you think this when it gives your tiny little nubbin a hard on but not when it comes to reproductive rights.

You only need to read the Liberal Women and What Women Really Want threads to know what you lot really think about women.

You really shouldn't need to be told that there is a big difference between what most women say and what they actually do.
 
There's not really a problem is there? If women don't want us knuckle dragging Neanderthals then the gentlemanly, chivalrous lads will have their pick while we crust up another sock. The gents should be celebrating the base humour of us sexist morons because we're granting them free reign over the women folk.
 
"crust up another sock". Ha ha ha!

Yup its funny, cos it ain't happening is it...
 
"crust up another sock". Ha ha ha!

Yup its funny, cos it ain't happening is it...
Not in my experience but perhaps I have been lucky enough to have bumped into the handful of women who weren't on the hunt for a knight in shining armour and instead wanted their thighs chafed. I am open minded to the idea that they are a minority group though, in that there are several billions of women who I have not soiled.
 
Not in my experience but perhaps I have been lucky enough to have bumped into the handful of women who weren't on the hunt for a knight in shining armour and instead wanted their thighs chafed. I am open minded to the idea that they are a minority group though, in that there are several billions of women who I have not soiled.

Time is a great cleaner.

Unusual name but great with a duster.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top