• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

War in Ukraine

....but this is at a terrible cost to Europe,Ukraine and democracy.
So was leaving Poland and half of Germany to Stalin.....and that was back when we had an empire and real power with substantial numbers willing to fight for the country.

Also, democracy in Ukraine is debatable.....also in Europe after what happened in Romania.
 
I don't know what that is but I suspect you're wide of the mark.

Meanwhile, JD Vance, what a c***, again.

To be fair to him this former corporate lawyer was in the US Marines and deployed for a 6 month tour, as a journalist and an enlisted man not even an officer. Must've been highly observant not managing to notice other nations allied in Iraq whilst he was there, and an even worse lawyer to put his foot in his mouth over it.

Signs of narcissism are there, who publishes a book about himself and his achievements aged only 31? Only top sportspeople in the twilight of their careers do that.
A lot of fuss about something he never actually said.

If you are making so much of an of the cuff remark, you don't really have much, do you.
 
Who does that? Well Churchill did both of what I highlight.....and he'd written about four books on his personal experiences by that time....published four times by 25 in fact.

He had also attracted a large amount of criticism...similar to yours.

I don't think Churchill went about stating that his allies had done not been involved.

I honestly don't know why you're defending Vance tbh.
 
2.20 in


Another undiplomatic disgraceful comment of utmost disrespect to an allied nation.
He has clarified that he was not specificaly refering to Britain.

One has to ask if some people really want to drive a wedge between Britain and the US. Some really are that stupid.
 
He has clarified that he was not specificaly refering to Britain.

One has to ask if some people really want to drive a wedge between Britain and the US. Some really are that stupid.
They don't care about the country at all.....in fact a lot of them hold resentment towards it.

Other than what relates specifically to them, all they care about is their ideology.
 
So was leaving Poland and half of Germany to Stalin.....and that was back when we had an empire and real power with substantial numbers willing to fight for the country.

Also, democracy in Ukraine is debatable.....also in Europe after what happened in Romania.
Wow, your very good with ancient history,this is now and here in other words RELEVANT.
 
I don't think Churchill went about stating that his allies had done not been involved.

I honestly don't know why you're defending Vance tbh.

I defend Vance because I think he's right....which in your opinion makes me one of those highly sought after female body parts.

However it doesn't change the fact that he's right.

 
Last edited:
He said he was not referring to British troops 🤷🏻‍♂️

That's almost 3 minutes of my life watching BBC propaganda that I won't get back 🙄


I told you 2:20 in so you could just hear him speak.

What difference does it make if he mentioned Britain or not. Do you know what ISAF was?


Why don't you just condemn him for it? It's obvious he's said something s***, or does Vance's s*** not stink for you?


Meanwhile, China just upped their rhetoric, so what were you saying about the peace this diplomacy is bringing? I don't have an issue with his tactics on our adversaries though, it's the treatment of allies that pisses me off.

 
They don't care about the country at all.....in fact a lot of them hold resentment towards it.

Other than what relates specifically to them, all they care about is their ideology.


Look, you're going to have to be sensible about this kind of language, and more honest. You seem to be labelling anyone that doesn't side with your own particular view as someone that believes in the DEI s***, I'm disappointed but maybe I've made a misjudgement.

I think a Trump voting mate of mine said to me the other night online whilst we were smashing Jerry in our P-38J's that you have 2 types of "Liberal" generally, the majority are "Traditional" and hold many of your beliefs and way forward, and you will agree with on many things, but you are lumping them in with the other lots, the "Progressive" Liberals, those are the screaming Palestine and LGBQT++++++ feminist flag wavers and clueless communist types. Very very different sorts, and without the former Trump wouldn't have got in.

Also, he is quite happy with domestic policy but quite upset by foreign policy, and like I said a couple of weeks back, most of the American people are not believing that Russia are suddenly the good guys because of a couple of tweets.
 
I told you 2:20 in so you could just hear him speak.

What difference does it make if he mentioned Britain or not. Do you know what ISAF was?


Why don't you just condemn him for it? It's obvious he's said something s***, or does Vance's s*** not stink for you?


Meanwhile, China just upped their rhetoric, so what were you saying about the peace this diplomacy is bringing? I don't have an issue with his tactics on our adversaries though, it's the treatment of allies that pisses me off.

This is all just talk. It's politically motivated.

What matters is the end result. We want a lasting peaceful solution.

We know what Putin is, and we have to deal with him regardless. We can play politics and squabble amongst ourselves, or we can accept the stark reality.

What is the alternative to negotiating an end to this war? Do you want escalation, or do you just want to score political points?
 
I defend Vance because I think he's right....which in your opinion makes me one of those highly sought after female body parts.

However it doesn't change the fact that he's right.



I don't know if emotion has the better of you but I slammed Vance for his awful lack of diplomacy, which is what your man here advocates. I also don't agree with the approach of Trump and Vance either, it's way way to hard and fast (in terms of arming Europe) although it looks to have worked. BUT I will also make a point that EU nations have followed US foreign policy, the USA has dictated the cold war and other hot wars up to now and demanded support from European nations, so for the USA to turn around and complain that they are the backstop and Europe is whatever blah blah is disgraceful behaviour, and Vance is a part of that.

And this piece isn't about what I said about Vance today, this only talks about the White House debacle, not what Vance said about allied nations in war.

Be pragmatic at least.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top